Skip to content
Beuncommon Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Beuncommon Inc

To emphasize that diversity, inclusivity, and individuality are our greatest strengths, beuncommon is committed to fostering a more inclusive environment by creating memorable, unique, and impactful events that connect brilliant individuals and companies with inclusive ideas focused on the youth and young adults.

$318k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$175k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2024.

Health$418kYouth Development$125kHuman Services$105kPhilanthropy$50kEducation$30kCivil Rights$25k
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k8 grants · $143k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $175k
$20,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE MORGAN ADAMS FOUNDATION$175,000
RAPE CRISIS CENTER$30,000
MORGANS INCLUSION INITIATIVE$25,000
ROCKY MOUNTAIN EQUALITY$25,000
ASPEN PREP ACADEMY$20,000
NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH$12,560
ACCESS OPPORTUNITY$10,000
FAMILY VOICES$10,000
CONNECTIONS FOR CHILDREN$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $265k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 49% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%CONNECTIONS FOR CHILDREN: $10k → 14%MORGAN'S INCLUSION INITIATIVE: $50k → 16%ENCIRCLE FAMILY AND YOUTH RESOURCE CENTER: $125k → 8%FAMILY VOICES COLORADO INC: $10k → 7%ACCESS OPPORTUNITY: $10k → 12%HEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION: $25k → 17%MORGANS INCLUSION INITIATIVE: $25k → 16%FAMILY VOICES: $10k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

56%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$395k · 3 repeat orgs$308k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +17% since the first grant, against -14% for those funded once.

3 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
3

Total granted

$395k
$200k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
-14%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $108k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24
Human ServicesHealthCivil RightsEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TM
    THE MORGAN ADAMS FOUNDATION
    2× · 2023–2024 · $300k · revenue +45%
  • MI
    Morgan's Inclusion Initiative FKA Morgan's Wonderland Inclusion Foundation
    2× · 2023–2024 · $75k · revenue +12%
  • FV
    FAMILY VOICES COLORADO INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $20k · revenue +17%

Funded once

  • EF
    Encircle Family and Youth Resource Center
    one grant, 2023 · $125k · revenue -14%
  • EY
    Envision You
    one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue -63%
  • HEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION FKA HEALTH NET FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue +79%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mental Health Center of Boulder County Inc

Partnering to improve quality of life as a nonprofit organization dedicated to mental health and wellness. healing is our purpose, help is our promise, health is our passion.

—
2
Summit Community Care Clinic Inc

Provide exceptional, integrated, patient-centered health care services designed to meet the needs of all patients, particularly those who experience barriers to accessing care, regardless of their ability to pay.

Health
3
Rocky Mountain Youth Medical and Nursing

The Organization provides a full range of high-quality healthcare to children and adolescents in Colorado regardless of insurance status or family's ability to pay. Our services are mainly for the under-served and at-risk youth, including…

Health
4
Arbor Research Collaborative for Health

Arbor research collaborative for health is committed to improving patient care through research that shapes medical policies and practice. in particular, arbor research conducts health outcomes research on chronic disease and end-stage…

Health
5
Arizona Family Health Partnership

To make sexual and reproductive healthcare accessible to everyone

—
6
Colorado Museum of Natural History

Be a catalyst! Ignite our community's passion for nature and science.

Arts & Culture
7
Regional West Health Services

Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.

Health
8
Colorado Physician Health Program Corporation

The mission of the Colorado Physician Health Program Corporation is to promote the health and well-being of physicians and physician assistants through evaluation, treatment referral, support education and research.

Health
9
Colorado Legal Services

To provide meaningful access to high quality, civil legal services in the pursuit of justice for as many low income persons and members of vulnerable populations throughout colorado as possible.

Crime & Legal
10
The Arc of Colorado

The arc of colorado provides individual and systems change advocacy for persons with intellectual and developmental disabilities (idd) residing in colorado and their families.

Human Services
11
One Colorado Education Fund

One colorado education fund (ocef) is committed to securing and protecting equality and opportunity for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (lgbt) coloradans and their families.

Civil Rights
12
Aia Colorado

AIA Colorado,is the voice of the architecture profession in Colorado. Through advocacy, leadership development, education and resources for architects, the organization supports architecture professionals in designing a better world where…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Denver Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Envision You. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE MORGAN ADAMS FOUNDATION: $300,000 · HealthTHE MORGAN ADAMS FOUNDATIONALAMO AREA RAPE CRISIS CENTER: $30,000 · HealthALAMO AREA RAPE CRISIS CENTERNATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH: $12,560 · HealthEncircle Family and Youth Resource Center: $125,000 · Human ServicesEncircle Family and Youth Resource Cent…Morgan's Inclusion Initiative FKA Morgan's Wonderland Inclusion Foundation: $75,000 · Human ServicesMorgan's Inclusion Initiative FKA Morga…HEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION FKA HEALTH NET FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesHEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION FKA HEALTH NET…FAMILY VOICES COLORADO INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY VOICES COLORADO INCACCESS OPPORTUNITY: $10,000 · Human ServicesCONNECTIONS FOR CHILDREN: $10,000 · Human ServicesTHE DENVER FOUNDATION: $50,000 · PhilanthropyEnvision You: $50,000 · OtherBOULDER PRIDE: $25,000 · Civil RightsASPEN PREP ACADEMY: $20,000 · Education
Health$342,560Human Services$265,000Philanthropy$50,000Other$50,000Civil Rights$25,000Education$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE MORGAN ADAMS FOUNDATION: $300,000 over 2y, 6.0% of budgetEncircle Family and Youth Resource Center: $125,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetMorgan's Inclusion Initiative FKA Morgan's Wonderland Inclusion Foundation: $75,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetTHE DENVER FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEnvision You: $50,000 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetALAMO AREA RAPE CRISIS CENTER: $30,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetBOULDER PRIDE: $25,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetHEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION FKA HEALTH NET FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFAMILY VOICES COLORADO INC: $20,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetASPEN PREP ACADEMY: $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH: $12,560 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetACCESS OPPORTUNITY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCONNECTIONS FOR CHILDREN: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Denver FoundationColorado Gives Founda…National Giving Found…The Janus Henderson F…Rose Community Founda…Mile High United Way …The Blackbaud Giving …American Endowment Fo…American Online Givin…Charities Aid Foundat…National Philanthropi…Morgan Stanley Global…
The Denver FoundationCO17× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Denver Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · National Giving Foundation Inc · The Janus Henderson Foundation · Rose Community Foundation · Mile High United Way Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Beuncommon Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Beuncommon Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Beuncommon Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Beuncommon Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Beuncommon’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home