· Public charity
Beuncommon Inc
To emphasize that diversity, inclusivity, and individuality are our greatest strengths, beuncommon is committed to fostering a more inclusive environment by creating memorable, unique, and impactful events that connect brilliant individuals and companies with inclusive ideas focused on the youth and young adults.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2023–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k8 grants · $143k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $175k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE MORGAN ADAMS FOUNDATION | $175,000 |
| RAPE CRISIS CENTER | $30,000 |
| MORGANS INCLUSION INITIATIVE | $25,000 |
| ROCKY MOUNTAIN EQUALITY | $25,000 |
| ASPEN PREP ACADEMY | $20,000 |
| NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH | $12,560 |
| FAMILY VOICES | $10,000 |
| CONNECTIONS FOR CHILDREN | $10,000 |
| ACCESS OPPORTUNITY | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–24, $265k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 49% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +17% since the first grant, against -14% for the ones you funded once.
3 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $108k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TMTHE MORGAN ADAMS FOUNDATION2× · 2023–2024 · $300k · revenue +45%
- MIMorgan's Inclusion Initiative FKA Morgan's Wonderland Inclusion Foundation2× · 2023–2024 · $75k · revenue +12%
- FVFAMILY VOICES COLORADO INC2× · 2023–2024 · $20k · revenue +17%
Funded once
- EFEncircle Family and Youth Resource Centerone grant, 2023 · $125k · revenue -14%
- EYEnvision Youone grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue -63%
HEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION FKA HEALTH NET FOUNDATION INCgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue +38%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Partnering to improve quality of life as a nonprofit organization dedicated to mental health and wellness. healing is our purpose, help is our promise, health is our passion.
Provide exceptional, integrated, patient-centered health care services designed to meet the needs of all patients, particularly those who experience barriers to accessing care, regardless of their ability to pay.
The Organization provides a full range of high-quality healthcare to children and adolescents in Colorado regardless of insurance status or family's ability to pay. Our services are mainly for the under-served and at-risk youth, including…
Arbor research collaborative for health is committed to improving patient care through research that shapes medical policies and practice. in particular, arbor research conducts health outcomes research on chronic disease and end-stage…
To make sexual and reproductive healthcare accessible to everyone
Be a catalyst! Ignite our community's passion for nature and science.
Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.
The mission of the Colorado Physician Health Program Corporation is to promote the health and well-being of physicians and physician assistants through evaluation, treatment referral, support education and research.
To provide meaningful access to high quality, civil legal services in the pursuit of justice for as many low income persons and members of vulnerable populations throughout colorado as possible.
The arc of colorado provides individual and systems change advocacy for persons with intellectual and developmental disabilities (idd) residing in colorado and their families.
One colorado education fund (ocef) is committed to securing and protecting equality and opportunity for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (lgbt) coloradans and their families.
AIA Colorado,is the voice of the architecture profession in Colorado. Through advocacy, leadership development, education and resources for architects, the organization supports architecture professionals in designing a better world where…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Denver Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Envision You. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE MORGAN ADAMS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Encircle Family and Youth Resource Center ↗
- Who funds Morgan's Inclusion Initiative FKA Morgan's Wonderland Inclusion Foundation ↗
- Who funds THE DENVER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Envision You ↗
- Who funds ALAMO AREA RAPE CRISIS CENTER ↗
- Who funds HEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION FKA HEALTH NET FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BOULDER PRIDE ↗
- Who funds FAMILY VOICES COLORADO INC ↗
- Who funds ASPEN PREP ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH ↗
- Who funds ACCESS OPPORTUNITY ↗
- Who funds CONNECTIONS FOR CHILDREN ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Denver Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · National Giving Foundation Inc · The Janus Henderson Foundation · Rose Community Foundation · Mile High United Way Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Beuncommon Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Beuncommon Inc?
Find your warmest path to Beuncommon Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.