Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ben H and Gladys Arkelian Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$137k
Granted FY2025still arriving
25
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$33k
Largest
01What it funds
0181% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Housing & Shelter$173kYouth Development$141kHealth$115kReligion$113kEducation$85kArts & Culture$83kCivil Rights$53kCommunity Improvement$43kOther$0
02FY2025 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k21 grants · $51k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $86k
$2,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$5.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$32,975
KERN CO MUSEUM$23,000
BAKERSFIELD HOMELESS CENTER$18,000
BOYS GIRLS CLUB OF KERN COUNTY$12,000
FLOOD MINISTRIES$9,000
ALLIANCE AGAINST FAM VIOLENCE$6,000
CHILD GUIDANCE CENTER$5,000
JJ'S LEGACY$5,000
RESURRECTION CHURCH$4,914
TEHACHAPI BUILD-A-PLANE$2,500
BRIDGES FOR PEACE$2,500
MARE$2,500
GLOBAL FAMILY CARE NETWORK$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,400
KERN COUNTY HIGH SCHOOL$1,350
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 18%CHILD GUIDANCE CENTER: $5k → 18%SLEEPY BABY BOX FOUNDATION: $1k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.0M · 44 repeat orgs$106k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +40% since the first grant, against +38% for those funded once.

44 repeat relationships: 19 still active in FY2025, 25 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

44
39

Total granted

$1.0M
$90k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+38%

Still filing today

23%
21%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $17k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureRecreation & SportsInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BS
    BETHANY SERVICES INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $161k · revenue +63%
  • VC
    VALLEY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL
    4× · 2017–2020 · $45k · revenue +76%
  • BM
    BAKERSFIELD MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
    4× · 2018–2024 · $35k · revenue +53%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $15k
  • NF
    NICHOLAS FD FOR EDUCATION
    one grant, 2017 · $7k
  • KC
    KERN COMMUNITY FUND
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Children's Healthcare of California

The primary exempt purpose of children's healthcare of california includes without limitation the receipt of distributions and grants for the making of distributions and grants to children's hospital of orange county (choc) and to…

Health
2
Children's Specialty Care Coalition

To ensure that children with complex health care needs have access to timely and high quality medical care, and that pediatric specialists are able to thrive in californias health care

Community Improvement
3
Partnership for Children

To increase access to medical care for children with serious illnesses and support their families.

Human Services
4
Valley Children's Healthcare

To support health care activities and programs for the benefit of, and to provide health care services to, children and adults in central california with diseases, disorders and other health problems of pediatric origin, and to enhance the…

Health
5
Central California Family Crisis Center

The Organization provides shelter, meals, clothing and counseling for victims of domestic violence, housing crisis, and/or poverty.

Human Services
6
Children's Hospital of Orange County

To nurture, advance and protect the health and well-being of children.

Health
7
Central California Food Bank

Ccfb is dedicated to ending hunger, working with over 200 partner agencies to provide food to those experiencing hunger. our mission: transforming lives together, in the passionate pursuit to end hunger in central ca - one meal, one…

Food & Nutrition
8
California Childrens Hospital Association

Our mission is to advance the well-being of children, promote access to high quality pediatric health care, and ensure the long-term viability of childrens hospitals.

—
9
Children's Fund Inc

Giving our most vulnerable children support, opportunity and hope by breaking destructive cycles through community partnerships.

Human Services
10
Children's Home Society of California

The mission of children's home society of california is to provide children, families, and communities with supportive services to thrive.

Human Services
11
California Alliance of Caregivers

California Alliance of Caregivers represents the voices of relative and non-relative caregivers to promote the well-being of children in foster care. California Alliance of Caregivers provides training information support and advocacy for…

Health
12
Children Now

Children Now harnesses our collective power to advance equitable solutions for California's kids. Children Now breaks down systemic barriers so that all children have the services and supports they need to reach their full potential. By…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Bakersfield Crisis Pregnancy Center; the most unlike its peers is Sleepy Baby Box Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 89 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/23
Grantees still filing
17/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BETHANY SERVICES INC: $161,000 · OtherBETHANY SERVICES INCBOYS GIRLS CLUB OF KERN COUNTY: $109,250 · OtherBOYS GIRLS CLUB OF KERN COUNTYKERN CO MUSEUM: $75,000 · OtherKERN CO MUSEUMFLOOD MINISTRIES: $74,750 · OtherFLOOD MINISTRIESIndividual grant recipient: $74,561 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $66,650 · OtherIndividual grant recipientALLIANCE AGAINST FAM VIOLENCE: $53,000 · OtherALLIANCE AGAINST FAM VIOLENCE+65 more: $325,472 · Other+65 moreVALLEY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $45,000 · HealthVALLEY CH…BAKERSFIELD MEMORIAL HOSPITAL: $35,000 · HealthBAKERSFIE…BAKERSFIELD CRISIS PREGNANCY CENTER: $5,000 · HealthBAKERSFIE…JJs Legacy: $5,000 · HealthJJs Legac…+1 more: $2,000 · HealthCOYOTE CLUB: $40,000 · Recreation & SportsGlobal Family Care Network Inc: $19,000 · InternationalChristian Youth Film Society Inc: $13,000 · Youth DevelopmentVALLEY OAK CHARTER SCHOOL: $4,500 · EducationNORRIS MIDDLE SCHOOL PARENT TEACHER CLUB: $3,150 · EducationCountry Christian School Inc: $2,500 · EducationMONARCH JOINT VENTURE: $500 · EducationNICOLAS FUND FOR EDUCATION: $500 · EducationCHILD GUIDANCE CENTER INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $1,198 · Human ServicesBags4Kids LaJuana Moser: $1,000 · Human ServicesSLEEPY BABY BOX FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · Human Services
Other$939,683Health$92,000Recreation & Sports$40,000International$19,000Youth Development$13,000Education$11,150Human Services$8,198

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBETHANY SERVICES INC: $161,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetVALLEY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $45,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCOYOTE CLUB: $40,000 over 8y, 23% of budgetBAKERSFIELD MEMORIAL HOSPITAL: $35,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGlobal Family Care Network Inc: $19,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetChristian Youth Film Society Inc: $13,000 over 3y, 6.0% of budgetTHE CAT PEOPLE INC: $8,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetBakersfield Symphony Orchestra Inc: $7,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetBAKERSFIELD CRISIS PREGNANCY CENTER: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCHILD GUIDANCE CENTER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVALLEY OAK CHARTER SCHOOL: $4,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFLIGHT TEST HISTORICAL FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetCountry Christian School Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFREE WHEELCHAIR MISSION: $2,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $1,198 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBags4Kids LaJuana Moser: $1,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetNICOLAS FUND FOR EDUCATION: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BETHANY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds VALLEY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds COYOTE CLUB ↗
  • Who funds BAKERSFIELD MEMORIAL HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds Global Family Care Network Inc ↗
  • Who funds Christian Youth Film Society Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE CAT PEOPLE INC ↗
  • Who funds Bakersfield Symphony Orchestra Inc ↗
  • Who funds BAKERSFIELD CRISIS PREGNANCY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds CHILD GUIDANCE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds JJs Legacy ↗
  • Who funds VALLEY OAK CHARTER SCHOOL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Harry and Ethel West FoundationCA39.1× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Harry and Ethel West Foundation · Kern Community Foundation · The Virginia and Alfred Harrell Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ben H and Gladys Arkelian Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ben H and Gladys Arkelian Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Ben H and Gladys Arkelian Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Ben H and Gladys Arkelian Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 89 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ben H and Gladys Arkelian’s filings →

    More from the funding graph