Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Harry and Ethel West Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$187k
Granted FY2025still arriving
24
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$37k
Largest
01What you fund
0182% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Health$166kHousing & Shelter$164kEducation$159kArts & Culture$148kReligion$138kYouth Development$123kCommunity Improvement$62kCivil Rights$54kOther$0
02FY2025 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k19 grants · $65k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $122k
$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$6.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$36,970
RESURRECTION CHURCH$30,000
KERN CO MUSEUM$24,950
BAKERSFIELD HOMELESS CENTER$18,000
BOYS GIRLS CLUB OF KERN COUNTY$12,000
FLOOD MINISTRIES$9,000
ALLIANCE AGAINST FAM VIOLENCE$6,000
ASISTANCE LEAGUE OF BAKERSFIELD$5,530
Individual grant recipient$5,500
GLOBAL FAMILY CARE NETWORK$5,125
COYOTE CLUB$5,000
JJ'S LEGACY$5,000
CHILD GUIDANCE CLINIC$5,000
THE CAT PEOPLE$5,000
BRIDGES FOR PEACE$2,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $22k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 18%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 18%BAGS 4 KIDS: $500 → 18%BAGS 4 KIDS: $500 → 18%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF BAKERSFIELD: $14k → 18%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE BAKERSFIELD: $5k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.2M · 49 repeat orgs$148k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +40% since the first grant, against +1% for the ones you funded once.

49 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2025, 31 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

49
38

Total granted

$1.2M
$127k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+1%

Still filing today

24%
16%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $21k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthArts & CultureHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BS
    BETHANY SERVICES INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $153k · revenue +63%
  • BM
    BAKERSFIELD MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
    2× · 2018–2024 · $65k · revenue +53%
  • CS
    CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY BAKERSFIELD FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $59k · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $40k
  • HB
    HOUCHIN BOOD BANK
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • DS
    DEVELOPMENT SERVICES SUPPLY FDN
    one grant, 2022 · $7k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Kern County Network for Children

Assure community services to children

Human Services
2
Bakersfield Art Foundation Inc Dba Bakersfield Museum of Art

The Bakersfield Museum of Art inspires and engages diverse audiences by providing a broad spectrum of creative visual arts experiences through the exhibition and preservation of fine art, educational programs, community outreach and…

Arts & Culture
3
The Boys and Girls Clubs of Kern County

To enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, responsible citizens.

Youth Development
4
Kern County Library Foundation
Education
5
Valley Relics

Displaying historical artifacts pertaining to the Los Angeles and San Fernando Valley areas for the education and benefit of the public.

Arts & Culture
6
Bakersfield Parent-Nursery

Bakersfield Parent Nursery is a parent cooperative preschool serving children and families from our community.

7
SJVWater

Education

Environment
8
Central Valley Foster Care Inc

Operation of a foster family care agency

Human Services
9
Kern County Hispanic Chamber of Commerce

To create, promote and enhance business opportunities for our membership, and provide business, cultural and resource linkages, with special emphasis on the Hispanic community.

10
Volunteer Center of Kern County Inc

Provide the community with volunteer services

Philanthropy
11
Condors Community Foundation

The Condors Community Foundation (the Foundation) mission is to support community organizations whose purpose is to enhance the health, education and general well-being of Kern County residents, particularly children and families in need.…

Youth Development
12
Kern County Law Enforcement Foundation

Support of local law enforcement

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Bakersfield Crisis Pregnancy Center and the most unlike its peers is West Kern Oil Museum Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 93 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/21
Grantees still filing
15/21
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

BETHANY SERVICES INC — $153,072 · OtherBETHANY SERVICES INCKERN CO MUSEUM — $139,558 · OtherKERN CO MUSEUMBOYS GIRLS CLUB OF KERN COUNTY — $109,250 · OtherBOYS GIRLS CLUB OF KERN COUNTYFLOOD MINISTRIES — $77,750 · OtherFLOOD MINISTRIESIndividual grant recipient — $71,870 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $62,860 · OtherIndividual grant recipientALLIANCE AGAINST FAM VIOLENCE — $53,600 · OtherRESURRECTION CHURCH — $51,807 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $40,000 · Other+66 more — $329,353 · Other+66 moreBAKERSFIELD MEMORIAL HOSPITAL — $65,000 · HealthBAKERSFIEL…VALLEY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL — $50,000 · HealthVALLEY CHI…BAKERSFIELD CRISIS PREGNANCY CENTER — $5,000 · HealthJJs Legacy — $5,000 · HealthCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY BAKERSFIELD FOUNDATION — $58,850 · EducationCountry Christian School Inc — $9,500 · EducationNORRIS MIDDLE SCHOOL PARENT TEACHER CLUB — $3,150 · Education+1 more — $500 · EducationCOYOTE CLUB — $45,000 · Recreation & SportsASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF BAKERSFIELD — $19,435 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $2,000 · Human ServicesBags4Kids LaJuana Moser — $1,000 · Human ServicesGlobal Family Care Network Inc — $21,625 · InternationalTHE CAT PEOPLE INC — $13,000 · AnimalsBakersfield Symphony Orchestra Inc — $7,000 · Arts & CultureBUENA VISTA MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY — $250 · Arts & Culture+2 more — $200 · Arts & Culture
Other$1,089,120Health$125,000Education$72,000Recreation & Sports$45,000Human Services$22,435International$21,625Animals$13,000Arts & Culture$7,450

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBETHANY SERVICES INC — $153,072 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetBAKERSFIELD MEMORIAL HOSPITAL — $65,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY BAKERSFIELD FOUNDATION — $58,850 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetVALLEY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL — $50,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCOYOTE CLUB — $45,000 over 9y, 23% of budgetGlobal Family Care Network Inc — $21,625 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF BAKERSFIELD — $19,435 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetTHE CAT PEOPLE INC — $13,000 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetCountry Christian School Inc — $9,500 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetBakersfield Symphony Orchestra Inc — $7,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetBAKERSFIELD CRISIS PREGNANCY CENTER — $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBags4Kids LaJuana Moser — $1,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetMONARCH JOINT VENTURE — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBUENA VISTA MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY — $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWEST KERN OIL MUSEUM INC — $100 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BETHANY SERVICES INC
  • Who funds BAKERSFIELD MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY BAKERSFIELD FOUNDATION
  • Who funds VALLEY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL
  • Who funds COYOTE CLUB
  • Who funds Global Family Care Network Inc
  • Who funds ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF BAKERSFIELD
  • Who funds THE CAT PEOPLE INC
  • Who funds Country Christian School Inc
  • Who funds Bakersfield Symphony Orchestra Inc
  • Who funds BAKERSFIELD CRISIS PREGNANCY CENTER

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Ben H and Gladys Arkelian FoundationCA39.1× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Ben H and Gladys Arkelian Foundation · Kern Community Foundation · The Virginia and Alfred Harrell Foundation · Bakersfield West Rotary-Stroope Family Foundation · Diane S Lake Charitable Trust Lake Diane S Ttee · The Cynthia Lake Charitable Trust · Resnick Foundation · Dignity Health · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Harry and Ethel West Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Harry and Ethel West Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Harry and Ethel West Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 93 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph