Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Bellin Memorial Hospital Inc

Bellin health is a community owned not-for-profit organization responsible for improving the health and wellbeing of people living in northeast wisconsin and the upper peninsula of michigan, and all others we serve.

$520k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Health$1.3MEducation$769kCommunity Improvement$589kRecreation & Sports$510kHuman Services$384kPhilanthropy$330kYouth Development$137kArts & Culture$81kOther$0
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 9 grants below total $304,963 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $520,025 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $215,062 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k8 grants · $155k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $150k
$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.1B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NEW COMMUNITY CLINIC$150,000
ACHIEVE BROWN COUNTY$37,263
ENCOMPASS - EARLY EDUCATION AND CARE$30,000
UNIVERSITY OF WI GREEN BAY$20,000
YWCA GREATER GREEN BAY$20,000
ALTRUSA HOUSE$14,000
GREATER GREEN BAY COMMUN FOUNDATION$13,700
NEVILLE PUBLIC MUSEUM$10,000
GOLDEN HOUSE INC$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $307k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 2% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%YMCA GREATER MARINETTE-MENOMINEE: $5k → 12%ENCOMPASS EARLY EDUCATION & CARE: $35k → 10%ENCOMPASS EARLY EDUCATION AND: $35k → 10%ENCOMPASS EARLY EDUCATION AND CARE: $30k → 10%ENCOMPASS - EARLY EDUCATION AND CARE: $30k → 10%ENCOMPASS EARLY EDUCATION AND: $30k → 10%YWCA GREATER GREEN BAY: $25k → 10%YWCA GREATER GREEN BAY: $25k → 10%YWCA GREATER GREEN BAY: $24k → 10%YWCA GREATER GREEN BAY: $21k → 10%YWCA GREATER GREEN BAY: $20k → 10%YWCA GREATER GREEN BAY: $8k → 10%ENCOMPASS EARLY EDUCATION & CARE: $8k → 10%ENCOMPASS EARLY EDUCATION & CARE: $8k → 10%ENCOMPASS EARLY EDUCATION & CARE: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.5M · 32 repeat orgs$194k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +42% since the first grant, against +7% for the ones you funded once.

32 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 25 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

32
13

Total granted

$3.5M
$184k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
+7%

Still filing today

75%
77%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthYouth DevelopmentCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NC
    NEW COMMUNITY CLINIC LTD
    7× · 2017–2024 · $650k · revenue +30%
  • FS
    FAMILY SERVICES OF NORTHEAST WI INC
    6× · 2018–2023 · $237k · revenue +51%
  • EE
    ENCOMPASS EARLY EDUCATION & CARE INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $180k · revenue +75%

Funded once

  • KS
    KEWAUNEE SCHOOL DISTRICT
    one grant, 2017 · $60k
  • GG
    GREATER GREEN BAY CONVENTION & VISITORS BUREAUgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $25k · revenue +57%
  • AP
    ASHWAUBENON PUBLIC SAFETY DEPARTMENT
    one grant, 2018 · $25k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Saginaw County Chamber of Commerce

To be a catalyst for economic and community progress within the great lakes bay region.

—
2
Minnesota Chamber of Commerce and Industry

The minnesota chamber of commerce proactively leads the business community statewide to: advance pro-business, responsible minnesota public policy that creates jobs and grows the econony; provde member services to address evolving business…

—
3
Wisconsin Policy Forum Inc

We conduct impartial public policy research and analysis to drive informed debate and effective decision-making in the state of wisconsin.

Public Benefit
4
The Chamber of Manitowoc County Inc

The chamber of manitowoc is a member-driven organization that provides resources and services to promote and maintain a strong business environment.

—
5
Greater Green Bay Chamber of Commerce Foundation Inc

Enhance economic and workforce development and improve the quality of life in our community and region.

Community Improvement
6
Minneapolis Regional Chamber of Commerce

Creating powerful advocacy to enhance economic vitality in the minneapolis-st. paul region.

—
7
Chamber of Commerce - Greater Beloit

Chamber of commerce to support, ancourage and engage in activities that make the greater Beloit area a better place to live and do business.

Education
8
Greater Bloomington Chamber of Commerce Inc

The greater bloomington chamber of commerce provides leadership through member engagement, business advocacy and civic partnerships to strengthen our community and business environment.

—
9
Oshkosh Chamber of Commerce

To provide leadership and to serve and represent our members so their businesses and our communities will prosper.

—
10
Aging and Disability Resource Center of Brown County Inc

The adrc of brown county supports older adults, adults with disabilities, and caregivers through education, advocacy, and resources. we connect people to answers, in our center, by phone, or at home, so everyone can live with diginity and…

—
11
Oshkosh Convention & Visitors Bureau Inc

To promote oshkosh and winnebago county a premier destination for corporate, sports, and leisure groups and individual visitors.

—
12
Nonprofit Center of Milwaukee Inc

To promote interests and effectiveness of the nonprofit sector through strengthening organizational capacity, expanding volunteerism and encouraging collaboration.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greater Green Bay Community Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is American Heart Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 46 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number18%0%<5yr13%6%5–10yr21%6%10–20yr15%12%20–35yr14%36%35–55yr18%39%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value18%0%<5yr13%4%5–10yr21%4%10–20yr15%3%20–35yr14%51%35–55yr18%38%55yr+

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 6% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%1/49
the rest of the field
6%
107/1,711

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

39 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 39 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
38/39
Grantees still filing
29/39
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

NEW COMMUNITY CLINIC LTD — $650,000 · OtherNEW COMMUNITY CLINIC LTDUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN — $447,050 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSINGreen Bay Area Public School District — $266,834 · OtherGreen Bay Area Public School DistrictHOWARD SUAMICO SCHOOL DISTRICT — $250,000 · OtherHOWARD SUAMICO SCHOOL DISTRICTALTRUSA INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION OF GREEN BAY WISCONSIN INC — $164,000 · OtherALTRUSA INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION OF GREEN BAY WISCONSIN INCGREATER GREEN BAY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INC — $145,650 · OtherGREATER GREEN BAY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INCBELLIN COLLEGE INC — $111,482 · Other+23 more — $516,736 · Other+23 moreGREATER GREEN BAY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $420,100 · PhilanthropyGREATER GREEN B…BROWN COUNTY UNITED WAY — $75,500 · PhilanthropyBROWN COUNTY UN…M & M AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $30,500 · PhilanthropyM & M AREA COMM…COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR THE FOX VALLEY REGION INC — $25,000 · Philanthropy+1 more — $18,167 · PhilanthropyFAMILY SERVICES OF NORTHEAST WI INC — $237,200 · Human ServicesFAMILY SERVICES…ENCOMPASS EARLY EDUCATION & CARE INC — $180,000 · Human ServicesENCOMPASS EARLY…YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER GREEN BAY INC — $122,200 · Human ServicesYOUNG WOMEN'S C…+2 more — $15,000 · Human ServicesCEREBRAL PALSY INC — $112,000 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc — $15,000 · HealthCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC — $15,000 · HealthMARCH OF DIMES INC — $10,000 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $5,500 · HealthKIWANIS SKI CLUB INC — $120,000 · Recreation & SportsCURATIVE CONNECTIONS INC — $100,000 · EmploymentACHIEVE BROWN COUNTY INC — $77,263 · EducationBRIAN LAVIOLETTE SCHOLARSHIP FUND FOUNDATION INC — $11,000 · Education
Other$2,551,752Philanthropy$569,267Human Services$554,400Health$157,500Recreation & Sports$120,000Employment$100,000Education$88,263

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNEW COMMUNITY CLINIC LTD — $650,000 over 7y, 2.0% of budgetGREATER GREEN BAY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $420,100 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetFAMILY SERVICES OF NORTHEAST WI INC — $237,200 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetENCOMPASS EARLY EDUCATION & CARE INC — $180,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetALTRUSA INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION OF GREEN BAY WISCONSIN INC — $164,000 over 7y, 32% of budgetGREATER GREEN BAY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INC — $145,650 over 5y, 2.3% of budgetYOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER GREEN BAY INC — $122,200 over 6y, 1.9% of budgetKIWANIS SKI CLUB INC — $120,000 over 6y, 14% of budgetCEREBRAL PALSY INC — $112,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetBELLIN COLLEGE INC — $111,482 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetCURATIVE CONNECTIONS INC — $100,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetACHIEVE BROWN COUNTY INC — $77,263 over 3y, 81% of budgetBROWN COUNTY UNITED WAY — $75,500 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetTHE NEVILLE PUBLIC MUSEUM FOUNDATION INC — $50,000 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetDOWNTOWN GREEN BAY INC — $40,500 over 4y, 5.5% of budgetDOCTORS IN RECITAL INC — $30,736 over 4y, 13% of budgetM & M AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $30,500 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetGREATER GREEN BAY CONVENTION & VISITORS BUREAU — $25,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR THE FOX VALLEY REGION INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBAY-LAKES COUNCIL #635 BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA — $20,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetFOUNDATIONS HEALTH & WHOLENESS INC — $20,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE BAY AND LAKES REGION INC — $20,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC — $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBRIAN LAVIOLETTE SCHOLARSHIP FUND FOUNDATION INC — $11,000 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetDOOR COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $10,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF NORTHEAST WISCONSIN INC — $10,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetGOLDEN HOUSE INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMYTEAM TRIUMPH INC — $10,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING SERVICES OF GREEN BAY INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $5,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF THE NORTHWESTERN GREAT LAKES INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGREATER MARINETTE-MENOMINEE YMCA INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF DOOR COUNTY INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetIMAGINATION FACTORY COMMUNITY CENTER — $5,000 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetHOWE COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER INC — $5,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Green Bay Com…Green Bay Packers Fou…George Kress Foundati…Wisconsin Public Serv…John and Engrid Meng …Brown County United W…Community Foundation …De Pere Christian Out…K C Stock Foundation …US Ventureschmidt Fam…Chernick Family Found…Cornerstone Foundatio…
Greater Green Bay Community Foundation IncWI58.1× affinity27 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Green Bay Community Foundation Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · George Kress Foundation Inc · Wisconsin Public Service Foundation · John and Engrid Meng Inc · Brown County United Way · Community Foundation for the Fox Valley Region Inc · De Pere Christian Outreach · K C Stock Foundation Inc · US Ventureschmidt Family Foundation · Chernick Family Foundation Inc · Cornerstone Foundation of Northeastern Wisconsin Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Bellin Memorial Hospital Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    15report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 49 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines