Skip to content

· Private foundation

Beck Community Development Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$185k
Granted FY2024still arriving
18
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$962kHealth$545kHousing & Shelter$398kHuman Services$285kPublic Benefit$135kPhilanthropy$133kReligion$71kYouth Development$25kOther$0
02FY2024 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k10 grants · $42k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $143k
$8,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$636k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF METRO$30,000
REBUILDING TOGETHER GREATER DALLAS INC$30,000
DENVER CHILDREN'S HOME$20,000
CMC FOUNDATION OF CENTRAL TEXAS$20,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY FW$13,000
MOBILE LOAVES & FISHES - HOUSING$10,000
HEARTS & HAMMERS TWIN CITIES$10,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES$10,000
TEXAS RAMP PROJECT$8,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF UN TECHO PARA MI PAIS$5,510
HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY$5,000
FORT WORTH CRADLE TO CAREER$5,000
ARLINGTON ISD DAN DIPERT CAREER AND TECHNICAL CENTER$4,301
THE CENTER FOR CHILDREN AND YOUTH$3,019
AGC CONSTRUCTION EDUCATION FOUNDATION COLORADO$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $83k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 32% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF UN TECHO PARA MI PAIS: $11k → 15%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF UN TECHO PARA MI PAIS: $10k → 15%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF UN TECHO PARA MI PAIS: $6k → 15%THE CENTER FOR CHILDREN AND YOUTH: $39k → 8%THE CENTER FOR CHILDREN AND YOUTH: $15k → 8%THE CENTER FOR CHILDREN AND YOUTH: $3k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
NY
CO
VA
NC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.2M · 21 repeat orgs$199k to everyone else

21 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
18

Total granted

$2.2M
$161k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+45%

Still filing today

62%
39%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $38k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHousing & ShelterHealthHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TU
    The University of Tampa Incorporated
    6× · 2017–2023 · $863k · revenue +77%
  • DC
    DELL CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION
    4× · 2019–2024 · $235k · revenue +156%
  • CL
    Carson Leslie Foundation
    6× · 2017–2023 · $177k · revenue +145%

Funded once

  • DC
    DELL CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER
    one grant, 2017 · $90k
  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY - DALLAS
    one grant, 2020 · $15k
  • HL
    H LEE MOFFITT CANCER CENTER
    one grant, 2023 · $9k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The University of TexasTexas a&M Investment Management Company

To generate superior long-term investment returns to support The University of Texas and Texas A&M University systems as they provide world-class teaching, push the boundaries of discovery, and achieve excellence in patient healthcare for…

Education
2
Dallas Area Habitat for Humanity Inc

Dallas area habitat for humanity, inc. is a nondenominational christian not-for-profit organization whose purpose is to sponsor specific projects in habitat development for the dallas, texas area. modest but adequate housing, new or…

—
3
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
4
Texas Apartment Association Education Foundation

Educates texans about career opportunities in the rental housing industry and works with our local apartment association and workforce development partners to support training programs for those new to the industry.

Education
5
Fort Collins Habitat for Humanity

Seeking to put god's love into action; habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities, and hope to realize our vision of a world where everyone has a decent place to live. fort collins habitat for humanity adheres…

Housing & Shelter
6
Children's Health System of Texas

With more than 1 million patient visits each year, Children's Health is North Texas' leading pediatric health system and among the largest in the nation. For more than a century, our mission has been clear: make life better for children.…

Health
7
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
8
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
9
The Real Estate Council Inc

Trec's mission is to cultivate relationships in the commercial real estate industry to catalyze community investment, influence policy, propel careers and develop the leaders of tomorrow.we believe relationships are the lifeblood of career…

—
10
Uatx

Uatx is a nonprofit dedicated to building a liberal arts university committed to freedom of inquiry, freedom of conscience, and civil discourse. to maintain these principles, the university will be fiercely independent financially,…

Education
11
University Hospital & Clinics Inc

The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
12
Housing Forward

Housing forward leads in the development and implementation of an effective homeless response system to make homelessness rare, brief, and non-recurring in dallas and collin counties.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Habitat for Humanity in Atlanta Inc; the most unlike its peers is Lowry Park Zoological Society of Tampa Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
20/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE SALVATION ARMY: $258,650 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYDELL CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $234,661 · OtherDELL CHILDREN'S FOUNDATIONGOVERNMENT OF THE BAHAMAS OFFICE OF THE PRIME MINISTER: $134,852 · OtherGOVERNMENT OF THE BAHAMAS OFFICE OF THE PRIME MINI…DELL CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER: $90,000 · OtherDELL CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTERHABITAT FOR HUMANITY - COLORADO: $72,559 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY - COLORADOHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF METRO DENVER INC: $71,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF METRO DENVER INCMT PARAN CHURCH: $70,500 · OtherMT PARAN CHURCHBECK COMMUNITY DEV FND: $50,165 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY FW: $45,500 · Other+22 more: $122,723 · Other+22 moreThe University of Tampa Incorporated: $862,500 · EducationThe University of Tampa Incorporated+3 more: $35,795 · EducationCarson Leslie Foundation: $176,563 · HealthDENVER CHILDREN'S HOME: $23,000 · Health+1 more: $2,000 · HealthCOMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS INC: $100,000 · PhilanthropyTHE DALLAS FOUNDATION: $33,150 · PhilanthropyREBUILDING TOGETHER GREATER DALLAS INC: $65,000 · Housing & ShelterHEARTS AND HAMMERS - TWIN CITIES INC: $10,000 · Housing & ShelterTEXAS RAMP PROJECT: $8,000 · Housing & ShelterHABITAT FOR HUMANITY IN ATLANTA INC: $6,000 · Housing & ShelterTHE CENTER FOR CHILDREN & YOUNG ADULTS: $56,555 · Human ServicesAmerican Friends of Un Techo Para Mi Pais Inc: $26,422 · Human ServicesFORT WORTH CRADLE TO CAREER: $20,000 · Youth Development
Other$1,150,610Education$898,295Health$201,563Philanthropy$133,150Housing & Shelter$89,000Human Services$82,977Youth Development$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe University of Tampa Incorporated: $862,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetDELL CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $234,661 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetCarson Leslie Foundation: $176,563 over 6y, 17% of budgetCOMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS INC: $100,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF METRO DENVER INC: $71,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetREBUILDING TOGETHER GREATER DALLAS INC: $65,000 over 3y, 4.6% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR CHILDREN & YOUNG ADULTS: $56,555 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetTHE DALLAS FOUNDATION: $33,150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Friends of Un Techo Para Mi Pais Inc: $26,422 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetDENVER CHILDREN'S HOME: $23,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetEmory University: $20,462 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFORT WORTH CRADLE TO CAREER: $20,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetHEARTS AND HAMMERS - TWIN CITIES INC: $10,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetKENNESAW STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $9,833 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTEXAS RAMP PROJECT: $8,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY IN ATLANTA INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCONSTRUCTION EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $5,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAUSTIN HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLowry Park Zoological Society of Tampa Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHabitat For Humanity Of The Charlotte Region: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALL STARS PROJECT INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNAIOP INC: $4,800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE OVARIAN CANCER INSTITUTE INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMOBILE LOAVES & FISHES INC: $1,325 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The University of Tampa Incorporated ↗
  • Who funds DELL CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Carson Leslie Foundation ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF METRO DENVER INC ↗
  • Who funds REBUILDING TOGETHER GREATER DALLAS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR CHILDREN & YOUNG ADULTS ↗
  • Who funds THE DALLAS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds American Friends of Un Techo Para Mi Pais Inc ↗
  • Who funds DENVER CHILDREN'S HOME ↗
  • Who funds Emory University ↗
  • Who funds FORT WORTH CRADLE TO CAREER ↗
  • Who funds HEARTS AND HAMMERS - TWIN CITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds KENNESAW STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS RAMP PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY IN ATLANTA INC ↗
  • Who funds CONSTRUCTION EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds AUSTIN HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
  • Who funds Lowry Park Zoological Society of Tampa Inc ↗
  • Who funds Habitat For Humanity Of The Charlotte Region ↗
  • Who funds ALL STARS PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds NAIOP INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Blackbaud Giving FundSC12.5× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Texas Instruments Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Beck Community Development Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Beck Community Development Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Lowry Park Zoological Society of Tampa Inc: 0% of income from government
  • The University of Tampa Incorporated: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Beck Community Development Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Beck Community Development Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Beck Community Development’s filings →

More from the funding graph