· Private foundation
Beck Community Development Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k10 grants · $42k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $143k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| REBUILDING TOGETHER GREATER DALLAS INC | $30,000 |
| HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF METRO | $30,000 |
| DENVER CHILDREN'S HOME | $20,000 |
| CMC FOUNDATION OF CENTRAL TEXAS | $20,000 |
| HABITAT FOR HUMANITY FW | $13,000 |
| HEARTS & HAMMERS TWIN CITIES | $10,000 |
| MOBILE LOAVES & FISHES - HOUSING | $10,000 |
| RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES | $10,000 |
| TEXAS RAMP PROJECT | $8,000 |
| AMERICAN FRIENDS OF UN TECHO PARA MI PAIS | $5,510 |
| HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY | $5,000 |
| FORT WORTH CRADLE TO CAREER | $5,000 |
| ARLINGTON ISD DAN DIPERT CAREER AND TECHNICAL CENTER | $4,301 |
| THE CENTER FOR CHILDREN AND YOUTH | $3,019 |
| AGC CONSTRUCTION EDUCATION FOUNDATION COLORADO | $3,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $83k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 32% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
21 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $38k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TUThe University of Tampa Incorporated6× · 2017–2023 · $863k · revenue +77%
- DCDELL CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION4× · 2019–2024 · $235k · revenue +156%
- CLCarson Leslie Foundation6× · 2017–2023 · $177k · revenue +145%
Funded once
- DCDELL CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTERone grant, 2017 · $90k
- HFHABITAT FOR HUMANITY - DALLASone grant, 2020 · $15k
- HLH LEE MOFFITT CANCER CENTERone grant, 2023 · $9k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To generate superior long-term investment returns to support The University of Texas and Texas A&M University systems as they provide world-class teaching, push the boundaries of discovery, and achieve excellence in patient healthcare for…
Dallas area habitat for humanity, inc. is a nondenominational christian not-for-profit organization whose purpose is to sponsor specific projects in habitat development for the dallas, texas area. modest but adequate housing, new or…
Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…
Educates texans about career opportunities in the rental housing industry and works with our local apartment association and workforce development partners to support training programs for those new to the industry.
Seeking to put god's love into action; habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities, and hope to realize our vision of a world where everyone has a decent place to live. fort collins habitat for humanity adheres…
With more than 1 million patient visits each year, Children's Health is North Texas' leading pediatric health system and among the largest in the nation. For more than a century, our mission has been clear: make life better for children.…
As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.
Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.
Trec's mission is to cultivate relationships in the commercial real estate industry to catalyze community investment, influence policy, propel careers and develop the leaders of tomorrow.we believe relationships are the lifeblood of career…
Uatx is a nonprofit dedicated to building a liberal arts university committed to freedom of inquiry, freedom of conscience, and civil discourse. to maintain these principles, the university will be fiercely independent financially,…
The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.
Housing forward leads in the development and implementation of an effective homeless response system to make homelessness rare, brief, and non-recurring in dallas and collin counties.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Habitat for Humanity in Atlanta Inc and the most unlike its peers is Lowry Park Zoological Society of Tampa Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 41 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds The University of Tampa Incorporated ↗
- Who funds DELL CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Carson Leslie Foundation ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS INC ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF METRO DENVER INC ↗
- Who funds REBUILDING TOGETHER GREATER DALLAS INC ↗
- Who funds THE CENTER FOR CHILDREN & YOUNG ADULTS ↗
- Who funds THE DALLAS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds American Friends of Un Techo Para Mi Pais Inc ↗
- Who funds DENVER CHILDREN'S HOME ↗
- Who funds Emory University ↗
- Who funds FORT WORTH CRADLE TO CAREER ↗
- Who funds HEARTS AND HAMMERS - TWIN CITIES INC ↗
- Who funds KENNESAW STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds TEXAS RAMP PROJECT ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY IN ATLANTA INC ↗
- Who funds CONSTRUCTION EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ALL STARS PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds Lowry Park Zoological Society of Tampa Inc ↗
- Who funds Habitat For Humanity Of The Charlotte Region ↗
- Who funds AUSTIN HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
- Who funds NAIOP INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Texas Instruments Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Beck Community Development Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Lowry Park Zoological Society of Tampa Inc — 0% of income from government
- The University of Tampa Incorporated — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Beck Community Development Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Beck Community Development Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.