Skip to content
BCM Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

BCM Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$3.2M
Granted FY2024still arriving
40
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$947k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Youth Development$3.1MFood & Nutrition$2.4MArts & Culture$2.2MCommunity Improvement$2.0MEducation$1.6MHealth$870kHuman Services$695kCrime & Legal$650kOther$0
02FY2024 · 40 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $9k
  • $10k–50k21 grants · $592k
  • $50k–250k17 grants · $1.7M
  • $250k+1 grant · $947k
$40,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$55M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Boys Girls Club of Whittier$946,950
Interfaith Food Center$235,000
Los Angeles Regional Food Bank$185,000
United Peace Officers Against Crime$150,000
Library Foundation of Los Angeles$125,000
United Friends fo the Chiildren$125,000
CASA of Los Angeles$100,000
World Federation of Youth Clubs$95,000
Kidspace Children's Museum$75,000
Natural History Museum$75,000
Long Beach Museum of Art$75,000
LA County High School for the Arts$75,000
Helpline Youth Counseling Inc$75,000
Individual grant recipient$59,500
Whittier Historical Society$52,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $550k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SOCIAL AND EMOTIONAL WELLNESS INITIATIVE: $50k → 14%Jovenes Inc: $50k → 14%JOVENES INC: $25k → 14%Shoes That Fit: $25k → 14%Shoes That Fit: $20k → 14%SHOES THAT FIT: $15k → 14%Shoes That Fit: $15k → 14%United Friends fo the Chiildren: $125k → 14%United Friends fo the Chiildren: $125k → 14%United Friends fo the Chiildren: $100k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$13M · 44 repeat orgs$1.4M to everyone else

44 repeat relationships: 33 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

44
15

Total granted

$13M
$1.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+66%

Still filing today

84%
47%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $169k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesHealthAnimalsYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IF
    INTERFAITH FOOD CENTER
    5× · 2020–2024 · $1.2M · revenue +695% · 27% of their budget
  • CO
    CASA OF LOS ANGELES
    5× · 2020–2024 · $500k · revenue +49%
  • RL
    RANCHO LOS AMIGOS FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2020–2022 · $290k · revenue +16%

Funded once

  • WC
    WHITTIER COLLEGE - CEC
    one grant, 2020 · $532k
  • BA
    BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF WHITTIER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $250k · revenue +280%
  • BG
    Boys Girls Club of Hawaii
    one grant, 2021 · $70k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
All About Kids La
Philanthropy
2
Los Angeles Conservation Corps

The la conservation corps creates equitable opportunities for young people to build resilience in themselves, their communities and the environment through a program of work, education and support.

Employment
3
Museum Associates

To serve the public through the collection, conservation, exhibition and interpretation of significant works of art from a broad range of cultures and historical periods, and through translation of these collections into meaningful…

Arts & Culture
4
California Institute of Contemporary Art
—
5
Latino Theater Company

The latino theater company operates the los angeles theatre center, whose mission is to provide a world class arts center for those pursuing artistic excellence; a laboratory where both tradition and innovation are honored and honed; a…

Arts & Culture
6
Chico Children's Museum

None

Education
7
La's Best

La's best provides free supervised before and after-school activities to over 15,000 children at 200 schools in los angeles unified school district (lausd).

Education
8
La Scuola International School

Inspire brave learners to shape the future.

Education
9
Los Angeles Academy of Arts and Enterprise

To prepare students for leadership in the arts and business; where creativity, academic knowledge and financial literacy are essential for success. we are providing an education that integrates the four lenses of learning: academics, arts,…

Education
10
Los Angeles Conservancy

The los angeles conservancy is a nonprofit membership organization that works through education and advocacy to recognize, preserve, and revitalize the historic architectural and cultural resources of los angeles county.

Arts & Culture
11
Pasadena Museum of California Art

To present the breadth of california art and design through exhibitions that explore the cultural dynamics and influence that are unique to california.

—
12
San Carlos Childrens Theater

San carlos children's theater is a non-profit organization committed to educating youth on all aspects of theater production while nurturing creative expression, teamwork and appreciation for the arts

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Friends of the Children; the most unlike its peers is Foodbank of Southern California. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

50 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 50 of the 66 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

8
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
13
Early backer (in before they grew)
49/50
Grantees still filing
32/50
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Boys Girls Club of Whittier: $2,152,425 · OtherBoys Girls Club of WhittierWhitter College CEC: $1,389,781 · OtherWhitter College CECLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK: $925,000 · OtherLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANKWHITTIER COLLEGE - CEC: $532,073 · OtherWHITTIER COLLEGE - CEC+32 more: $2,845,405 · Other+32 moreINTERFAITH FOOD CENTER: $1,229,000 · EducationINTERFAITH FOOD CENTE…WHITTIER PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $652,500 · EducationWHITTIER PUBLIC LIBRA…THE LIBRARY FOUNDATION OF LOS ANGELES: $425,000 · EducationTHE LIBRARY FOUNDATIO…PUENTE LEARNING CENTER: $195,000 · EducationPUENTE LEARNING CENTE…MOUNT SAINT MARY'S UNIVERSITY: $100,000 · Education+4 more: $138,938 · EducationTHE NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM SANTA MARIA CALIFORNIA: $360,000 · Arts & CultureTHE NATURAL …LONG BEACH MUSEUM OF ART FOUNDATION: $285,000 · Arts & CultureLONG BEACH M…KIDSPACE A PARTICIPATORY MUSEUM: $275,000 · Arts & CultureKIDSPACE A P…Whittier Historical Society: $147,000 · Arts & CultureWhittier His…THE LOS ANGELES CHAMBER ORCHESTRA SOCIETY INC: $140,000 · Arts & CultureTHE LOS ANGE…FRIENDS OF THE CHILDRENS MUSEUM: $100,000 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF T…EDUCATION THROUGH MUSIC: $95,000 · Arts & CultureEDUCATION TH…A Noise Within: $70,000 · Arts & CultureINNER-CITY ARTS: $60,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $30,000 · Arts & CultureUNITED PEACE OFFICERS AGAINST CRIME: $450,000 · Human ServicesUNITED FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN: $350,000 · Human ServicesSHOES THAT FIT: $75,000 · Human ServicesJOVENES INC: $75,000 · Human ServicesSOCIAL & EMOTIONAL WELLNESS INITIATIVE: $50,000 · Human ServicesRANCHO LOS AMIGOS FOUNDATION INC: $290,000 · HealthThe Whole Child - Mental Health & Housing Services: $175,000 · HealthSPIRITT Family Services: $105,000 · HealthCASA OF LOS ANGELES: $500,000 · Civil RightsWORLD YOUTH CLUBS INC: $255,000 · Youth DevelopmentAL WOOTEN JR YOUTH CENTER: $25,000 · Youth Development
Other$7,844,684Education$2,740,438Arts & Culture$1,562,000Human Services$1,000,000Health$570,000Civil Rights$500,000Youth Development$280,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetINTERFAITH FOOD CENTER: $1,229,000 over 5y, 27% of budgetLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK: $925,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetWHITTIER PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $652,500 over 2y, 42% of budgetCASA OF LOS ANGELES: $500,000 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetUNITED PEACE OFFICERS AGAINST CRIME: $450,000 over 4y, 66% of budgetTHE LIBRARY FOUNDATION OF LOS ANGELES: $425,000 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetUNITED FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN: $350,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetRANCHO LOS AMIGOS FOUNDATION INC: $290,000 over 3y, 12% of budgetLONG BEACH MUSEUM OF ART FOUNDATION: $285,000 over 4y, 4.0% of budgetKIDSPACE A PARTICIPATORY MUSEUM: $275,000 over 4y, 3.3% of budgetWORLD YOUTH CLUBS INC: $255,000 over 5y, 6.1% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF WHITTIER INC: $250,000 over 1y, 5.9% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $220,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetHelpline Youth Counseling Inc: $200,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetPUENTE LEARNING CENTER: $195,000 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetFOOD FINDERS INC: $185,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetThe Whole Child - Mental Health & Housing Services: $175,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetA PLACE CALLED HOME: $155,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetWhittier Historical Society: $147,000 over 3y, 54% of budgetTHE LOS ANGELES CHAMBER ORCHESTRA SOCIETY INC: $140,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetLOS ANGELES MUSIC AND ART SCHOOL: $125,000 over 5y, 3.2% of budgetTHE RYMAN-CARROLL FOUNDATION: $120,000 over 5y, 2.7% of budgetChorale Bel Canto: $118,105 over 5y, 34% of budgetSPIRITT Family Services: $105,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetMOUNT SAINT MARY'S UNIVERSITY: $100,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE CHILDRENS MUSEUM: $100,000 over 2y, 16% of budgetLOS ANGELES REPERTORY THEATER: $100,000 over 5y, 100% of budgetGRIFFITH OBSERVATORY FOUNDATION: $80,000 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetWHITTIER REGIONAL SYMPHONY: $80,000 over 2y, 63% of budgetSHOES THAT FIT: $75,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetJOVENES INC: $75,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetWhittier Area Literacy Council: $74,938 over 3y, 53% of budgetFOODBANK OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $70,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetA Noise Within: $70,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetINNER-CITY ARTS: $60,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GRANTMAKERS: $60,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetSOCIAL & EMOTIONAL WELLNESS INITIATIVE: $50,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetAQUARIUM OF THE PACIFIC CORPORATION: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCalifornia Aquatic Therapy & Wellness Center Inc: $40,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetMAKING THE RIGHT CONNECTIONS INC: $40,000 over 3y, 5.9% of budgetGREATER LOS ANGELES ZOOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION: $30,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCALIFORNIA SCHOOL OF THE ARTS - SAN GABRIEL VALLEY FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetAL WOOTEN JR YOUTH CENTER: $25,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetCHILDREN'S BURN FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetGROUND EDUCATION: $15,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetSOUTH COAST BOTANIC GARDEN FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SAN MARCOS: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetRio Hondo College Foundation: $9,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Rose Hills Founda…The Ahmanson Foundati…The Ralph M Parsons F…California Community …The Green FoundationWeingart FoundationThe Annenberg Foundat…S Mark Taper Foundati…Kaiser Foundation Hos…Employees Community F…Sempra FoundationStern Sidney Memorial…
The Rose Hills FoundationCA37.9× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Rose Hills Foundation · The Ahmanson Foundation · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · California Community Foundation · The Green Foundation · Weingart Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation · S Mark Taper Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Employees Community Fund of Boeing California Inc · Sempra Foundation · Stern Sidney Memorial Tuw

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization BCM Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from BCM Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    21report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 66 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on BCM’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home