Skip to content

Montana · Private foundation

Bayne Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$226k
Granted FY2022
34
Grants FY2022
31
Organizations funded FY2022
90%
First-time grantees FY2022
Read the full brief

Read this first · the figures below need context

65% of Bayne Foundation Inc’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Whitefish Community Foundation Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 4 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2022, the last year Bayne Foundation Inc named its own grantees at scale: 23 organizations, $226k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

1
’17
3
’19
6
’20
6
’21
23
’22
18
’23
10
’24
4
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

Median grant, FY2022
$5,000
Largest grant, FY2022
$29,912
Organizations funded a year
2 to 31
FY2017 to FY2022
States reached, FY2022
8
Total assets, FY2022
$3.1M
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2022, 90% of the organizations Bayne Foundation Inc funded were first-time grantees, receiving 67% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 33% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $132k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22
EducationFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY202231$196k90%
FY20217$69k57%
FY20206$40k67%
FY20193$36k67%
FY20172$28kn/a
97% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$689kPublic Benefit$221kCrime & Legal$171kHealth$52kRecreation & Sports$48kYouth Development$45kHousing & Shelter$45kFood & Nutrition$36kOther$0

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
MN
MI
OH
CA
VA
MD
DC
FL

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 40 grantees

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 12 recipients with no EIN on record ($100k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Bayne Foundation Inc supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCato Institute: $221,201 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetInstitute for Justice: $165,598 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetDream Adaptive Recreation Inc: $40,810 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetSeeds of Caring: $36,109 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetOhio State University Foundation: $23,597 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFlathead Warming Center Inc: $19,958 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetNorth Valley Music School: $19,110 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetSamaritan House Inc: $15,386 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetSisters in Shelter: $12,000 over 2y, 8.4% of budgetWhitefish Legacy Partners Inc: $9,555 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCode Girls United: $8,163 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetK9s for Warriors Inc: $6,623 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSamaritan House: $5,163 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNorth Valley Food Bank: $5,097 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMontana State Parks Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetFlathead Food Bank Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGrand Rapids Art Museum: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetArchie Bray Foundation: $4,777 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMikeroweworks Foundation: $4,161 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPelotonia: $4,035 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOwl Research Institute Inc: $3,732 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetMissoula Food Bank & Community Center: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMontana Casagal Association: $2,500 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetAmazing Place Music Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetFlying Horse Farms: $2,090 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOpportunity Resources Inc: $2,060 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGlacier Symphony Orchestra and Chorale: $2,060 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetChildren's Hunger Alliance: $1,071 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetClimate Ride Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMontana Land to Hand: $988 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRuling Our Experiences Inc: $842 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMontana Innocence Project: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHighland Youth Garden Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTwo Bear Therapeutic Riding Center Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGilda's Club Twin Cities Inc: $412 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSt Cecilia Music Center: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChildrens Oncology Camp Foundation: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Assn: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMake-A-Wish Foundation of Michigan: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 39.

Nonprofits that may fit its grantmaking

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Whitefish Community Foundation IncMT40.6× affinity17 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Whitefish Community Foundation Inc · Dennis & Phyllis Washington Foundation · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · The Angora Ridge Foundation · Town Pump Charitable Foundation · Montana Community Foundation Inc · Broussard Charitable Foundation Tr · Oro y Plata Foundation · Roundup for Safety Inc · Headwaters Health Foundation of Western Montana · The Applied Materials Foundation · Cobb Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Bayne Foundation Inc with peer funders

About Bayne Foundation Inc

How much does Bayne Foundation Inc give?
Bayne Foundation Inc reported 34 grants totaling $226,459 in its FY2022 IRS filing. It funded between 2 and 31 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2022.
What does Bayne Foundation Inc fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Philanthropy (48%), Public Benefit (15%), Crime & Legal (12%).
Who are Bayne Foundation Inc's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: Cato Institute ($221k), Institute for Justice ($166k), Dream Adaptive Recreation Inc ($41k).
Does Bayne Foundation Inc fund new organizations?
In FY2022, 90% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Bayne Foundation Inc accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Bayne Foundation Inc?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Whitefish Community Foundation Inc, Dennis & Phyllis Washington Foundation, First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc.
Where is Bayne Foundation Inc based?
Bayne Foundation Inc is based in MT.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 54 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Bayne’s filings →

More from the funding graph