· Private foundation
Broussard Charitable Foundation Tr
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k22 grants · $100k
- $10k–50k14 grants · $231k
- $50k–250k5 grants · $477k
- $250k+1 grant · $300k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| USEA FOUNDATION | $300,000 |
| AMERICAN HORSE TRIALS FOUNDATION | $150,000 |
| FLATHEAD VALLEY COMMUNITY COLLEGE | $115,000 |
| BECKET BREAUXS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC | $100,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $62,250 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MONTANA INC | $50,000 |
| HURON STATION PLAYHOUSE INC | $45,000 |
| TULANE UNIVERSITY EDUCATIONAL FUND | $25,000 |
| SOUTHERN COLORADO SPAY & NEUTER | $25,000 |
| COLORADO SCHOOL OF MINES FDTN | $25,000 |
| WHITEFISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $16,000 |
| FLATHEAD VALLEY ROLLER DERBY | $15,000 |
| NEW NOW FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| MONTANA WOUNDED WARRIORS | $10,000 |
| COMPASSIONATE CARE FOUNDATION INC | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $51k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 90% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +17% since the first grant, against +15% for the ones you funded once.
64 repeat relationships — 32 still active in FY2025, 32 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $253k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- AHAMERICAN HORSE TRIALS FOUNDATION INC3× · 2020–2025 · $500k · revenue +63%
- WLWHITEFISH LEGACY PARTNERS INC7× · 2019–2025 · $328k · revenue +219%
- CSCOLORADO SCHOOL OF MINES FOUNDATION3× · 2019–2021 · $100k · revenue +85%
Funded once
- LHLOGAN HEALTH FDTNone grant, 2022 · $500k
- NVNORTH VALLEY MUSIC SCHOOLgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $250k · revenue +88%
- USUNITED STATES EVENTING ASSOCIATIONone grant, 2021 · $80k · revenue -12%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Marin humane transforms lives through exceptional animal care, humane education, and advocacy. every day, marin humane inspires compassion and positive relationships between people and animals.
Seattle humane promotes the human-animal bond by saving and serving pets in need, regardless of age, ability, circumstance or geography.
Our goal is to sustainably improve animal welfare, provide veterinary care, and improve veterinary education globally. in order to achieve this goal, we work in over 10 countries, across 5 continents, supporting local people and animals,…
To improve and save lives through compassionate care, community engagement and advocacy for animals.
A champion for animals since 1967, PAWS is a nationally recognized leader - rehabilitating injured and orphaned wildlife, sheltering and adopting homeless cats and dogs, and educating people to make a better world for animals and people.
Partner with detection dogs to further conservation initiatives around the world. Working Dogs for Conservation Foundation (WD4C) integrates scientific-detection dog teams with established management and conservation efforts to address…
The montana wildlife federation is a statewide conservation organization dedicated to protecting wildlife, wildlife habitat, and public access for outdoor recreation.
Wildearth guardians works to protect and restore the wildlife, wild places, wild rivers, and health of the american west.
UVHS improves quality of life for people and pets through an innovative animal shelter and adoption center and through services that reduce suffering, support wellness, and foster compassion.
To bring animals out of crisis and strengthen the bond between people and animals through emergency sheltering, disaster relief services, financial assistance and education. redrover accomplishes its mission by engaging volunteers and…
As america's first animal shelter, founded in 1869, women's humane society dba women's animal center (wac), assists people in the community, saves the lives of animals, and improves the health of pets through its shelter and adoptions…
Founded in 2023, humane animal partners is a nonprofit no-kill animal care and adoption center. we are committed to providing for the needs of homeless and owned dogs and cats in our community. we make "friends for life" by connecting…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wounded Warrior Project Inc and the most unlike its peers is Compassionate Care. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 24 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 12% of your grantees by number, and just 7% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 8% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
73 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 73 of the 129 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds USEA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN HORSE TRIALS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds WHITEFISH LEGACY PARTNERS INC ↗
- Who funds NORTH VALLEY MUSIC SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds Intermountain Planned Parenthood ↗
- Who funds Davidson College ↗
- Who funds WHITEFISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds COLORADO SCHOOL OF MINES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD ASSOCIATION OF UTAH ↗
- Who funds UNITED STATES EVENTING ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds THE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND ↗
- Who funds GLACIER SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA AND CHORALE ↗
- Who funds NORTHWEST MONTANA UNITED WAY INC ↗
- Who funds Oklahoma State University Foundation ↗
- Who funds Huron Station Playhouse Inc ↗
- Who funds Dian Fossey Gorilla Fund International Inc ↗
- Who funds SHEPHERD'S HAND FREE CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds COMPASSIONATE CARE ↗
- Who funds GENEVA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF NW MONTANA ↗
- Who funds FLATHEAD WARMING CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds MONTANA WOUNDED WARRIORS ↗
- Who funds UNITED STATES EQUESTRIAN TEAM FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds JANE GOODALL INSTITUTE FOR WILDLIFE RESEARCH EDUCATION AND CONSERVATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Whitefish Community Foundation Inc · Dennis & Phyllis Washington Foundation · Roundup for Safety Inc · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Bayne Foundation Inc · The Applied Materials Foundation · Floyd Foundation · Cobb Foundation · Cadeau Foundation · The Angora Ridge Foundation · Headwaters Health Foundation of Western Montana · Community Foundation of Acadiana
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Broussard Charitable Foundation Tr funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation — 0% of income from government
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.