Skip to content

· Public charity

Baylor University Medical Center

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

$19M
Granted FY2025still arriving
41
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$11M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$214MHuman Services$1.5MRecreation & Sports$1.2MEducation$597kPhilanthropy$376kHousing & Shelter$348kFood & Nutrition$261kCommunity Improvement$158kOther$0
02FY2025 · 41 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k15 grants · $112k
  • $10k–50k22 grants · $452k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $156k
  • $250k+3 grants · $19M
$15,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$4.5B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Baylor Research Institute$11,486,828
Southern Sector Health Initiative$6,175,000
American Cancer Society$896,400
Coalition to Strenghten America's Healthcare$156,000
Crystal Charity Ball$42,435
Society of St Vincent de Paul Charitable Pharmacy of North Texas Inc$35,000
Texas Health Resources Foundation$35,000
Texas Healthy at Home$25,000
United Way of Metropolitan Dallas$25,000
Parkland Foundation Inc$25,000
The Senior Source$24,200
YMCA of Metropolitan Dallas$23,000
Helps International Inc$20,000
Ark House Foundation$20,000
Vogel Alcove$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $974k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 86% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Texas Healthy at Home: $25k → 11%Community Resource Centers of Texas Inc: $8k → 9%Texas Healthy at Home: $50k → 11%Texas Healthy at Home: $25k → 11%Texas Healthy at Home: $25k → 11%Homes for Children Corporation: $8k → 11%Salesmanship Club Charitable Golf of Dallas Inc: $15k → 14%Salesmanship Club Charitable Golf of Dallas: $11k → 14%Metro Dallas Homeless Alliance: $25k → 14%Metro Dallas Homeless Alliance: $25k → 14%Metro Dallas Homeless Alliance: $25k → 14%Network of Community Ministries: $8k → 14%YMCA of Metropolitan Dallas: $23k → 14%YMCA of Metropolitan Dallas: $20k → 14%YMCA of Metropolitan Dallas: $20k → 14%Carson's Village: $10k → 14%Housing Forward: $25k → 14%OurCalling: $10k → 14%YMCA of Metropolitan Dallas: $40k → 14%YMCA of Metropolitan Dallas: $20k → 14%YMCA of Metropolitan Dallas: $20k → 14%YMCA of Metropolitan Dallas: $20k → 14%YMCA of Metropolitan Dallas: $20k → 14%The Concilio: $25k → 14%Dallas Concilio of Hispanic Service: $20k → 14%The Concilio: $20k → 14%The Concilio: $20k → 14%Concilio: $20k → 14%The Concilio: $20k → 14%The Concilio: $20k → 14%The Family Place: $30k → 14%The Family Place: $30k → 14%The Family Place: $30k → 14%The Family Place: $26k → 14%The Family Place: $22k → 14%The Family Place: $20k → 14%Vogel Alcove: $20k → 14%Vogel Alcove: $10k → 14%Vogel Alcove: $8k → 14%Council for Life: $15k → 14%Council for Life: $15k → 14%Council for Life: $15k → 14%Council for Life: $10k → 14%YMCA of Metropolitan Dallas: $20k → 14%Council for Life: $10k → 14%Council for Life: $10k → 14%Council for Life: $10k → 14%Council for Life: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$218M · 42 repeat orgs$591k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +26% since the first grant, against +17% for those funded once.

42 repeat relationships: 25 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

42
27

Total granted

$218M
$313k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+17%

Still filing today

93%
89%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $278k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementReligionYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BR
    Baylor Research Institute
    9× · 2017–2025 · $126M · revenue +33% · 35% of their budget
  • SS
    Southern Sector Health Initiative
    9× · 2017–2025 · $50M · revenue +36% · 97% of their budget
  • BAYLOR UNIVERSITY
    6× · 2017–2023 · $1.7M · revenue +57%

Funded once

  • TR
    THE RYAN ANTHONY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $50k · revenue -87%
  • OC
    OCHSNER CLINIC FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue +19%
  • DB
    DALLAS BAPTIST UNIVERSITYgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $15k · revenue +31%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dallas-Fort Worth Hospital Council

The mission of the Dallas-Fort Worth Hospital Council is to drive evidence-based improvement in patient care and health equity throughout the region.

—
2
Dallas County Medical Society

The mission of the dallas county medical society is to promote public health and advocate for physicians and their relationship with patients, while upholding professionalism in the practice of medicine.

—
3
Baylor University Medical Center

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
4
Young Texans Against Cancer Dallas

Young Texans Against Cancer is a network of motivated young professionals collectively working together to raise awareness and funds to support the local Dallas cancer community. The Dallas chapter was established in 2007, as part of a…

—
5
Baylor Scott & White Medical Centers - Greater North Texas

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
6
Baylor Medical Center at Irving

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
7
Baylor Health Care System Foundation

To foster and support the activities and purposes of Baylor Scott & White Health, to encourage broad-based public support of the health care system and its affiliated institutions, and to advance the medical objectives, including…

Health
8
Southwestern Health Resources Hospitals Joc

To create an integrated hospital system operating in the dallas area to improve the health of the people in the communities it serves without regard to their ability to pay.

Health
9
Baylor Scott & White Holdings

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
10
Baylor Regional Medical Center at Plano

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
11
Baylor Scott & White Medical Center - Centennial

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
12
Integrated Care Collaboration

ICC (dba Connxus) is a nonprofit alliance of health care providers in Central Texas dedicated to collecting, analyzing and sharing health information to improve healthcare quality and cost efficiency across the continuum of care.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Council of Greater Dallas; the most unlike its peers is The Farrah Fawcett Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

81 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 81 of the 86 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

6
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
19
Early backer (in before they grew)
80/81
Grantees still filing
52/81
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Baylor Research Institute: $126,277,754 · HealthBaylor Research InstituteSouthern Sector Health Initiative: $49,750,000 · HealthSouthern Sector Health InitiativeDallas County Indigent Care: $34,162,082 · HealthDallas County Indigent Care+20 more: $3,604,810 · HealthBAYLOR UNIVERSITY: $1,682,725 · Education+1 more: $15,000 · EducationYMCA OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS INC: $203,000 · Human ServicesThe Family Place: $158,174 · Human ServicesTHE CONCILIO: $145,000 · Human ServicesTexas Healthy at Home: $125,000 · Human ServicesHOUSING FORWARD: $100,000 · Human ServicesVOGEL ALCOVE: $97,900 · Human ServicesCOUNCIL FOR LIFE: $93,650 · Human ServicesCARSONS VILLAGE: $40,000 · Human Services+7 more: $71,500 · Human ServicesTHE CRYSTAL CHARITY BALL: $349,375 · PhilanthropyTHE NORTH TEXAS FAMILY HEALTH FOUNDATION: $150,000 · PhilanthropyArk House Foundation: $140,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS INC: $129,000 · PhilanthropySwim Across America Inc: $120,000 · PhilanthropyTHE DALLAS FOUNDATION: $74,560 · Philanthropy+3 more: $35,000 · PhilanthropySENIOR CITIZENS OF GREATER DALLAS INC: $273,100 · OtherNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK: $135,500 · OtherTarrant Area Food Bank: $64,500 · OtherPEGASUS FOUNDATION: $64,000 · OtherFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $50,000 · OtherChristian Transformation Foundation West Dallas dba Serve West Dallas: $34,000 · OtherDallas Area Interfaith: $40,000 · OtherMomentous Institute: $36,160 · Other+24 more: $258,680 · OtherJUNIOR LEAGUE OF DALLAS INC: $125,465 · Community ImprovementHILL COUNTRY COMMUNITY ACTION ASSOCIATION INC: $7,500 · Community ImprovementTHE STOREHOUSE COMMUNITY CENTER: $7,500 · Community ImprovementHELPS INTERNATIONAL: $110,000 · InternationalWORLD AFFAIRS COUNCIL OF DALLAS/FORT WORTH: $8,000 · International
Health$213,794,646Education$1,697,725Human Services$1,034,224Philanthropy$997,935Other$955,940Community Improvement$140,465International$118,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBaylor Research Institute: $126,277,754 over 9y, 35% of budgetSouthern Sector Health Initiative: $49,750,000 over 9y, 97% of budgetDallas County Indigent Care: $34,162,082 over 2y, 21% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $2,007,630 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetBAYLOR UNIVERSITY: $1,682,725 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CRYSTAL CHARITY BALL: $349,375 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetPARKLAND FOUNDATION: $330,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetSENIOR CITIZENS OF GREATER DALLAS INC: $273,100 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $250,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetYMCA OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS INC: $203,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL CHARITABLE PHARMACY OF NORTH TEXAS: $193,000 over 7y, 1.2% of budgetKIDNEYTEXAS INC: $170,380 over 8y, 36% of budgetThe Family Place: $158,174 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetCOALITION TO STRENGTHEN AMERICA'S HEALTH CARE: $156,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE NORTH TEXAS FAMILY HEALTH FOUNDATION: $150,000 over 2y, 4.9% of budgetTHE CONCILIO: $145,000 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetArk House Foundation: $140,000 over 7y, 30% of budgetNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK: $135,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS INC: $129,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetJUNIOR LEAGUE OF DALLAS INC: $125,465 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetTexas Healthy at Home: $125,000 over 4y, 27% of budgetSwim Across America Inc: $120,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $114,800 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetHELPS INTERNATIONAL: $110,000 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetHOUSING FORWARD: $100,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetTexas Health Resources Foundation: $99,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetVOGEL ALCOVE: $97,900 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetCOUNCIL FOR LIFE: $93,650 over 8y, 1.4% of budgetTHE DALLAS FOUNDATION: $74,560 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTarrant Area Food Bank: $64,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetPEGASUS FOUNDATION: $64,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $50,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE RYAN ANTHONY FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 7.8% of budgetCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC: $42,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetVETERANS CENTER OF NORTH TEXAS INC: $40,000 over 4y, 3.8% of budgetDallas Area Interfaith: $40,000 over 3y, 6.8% of budgetCARSONS VILLAGE: $40,000 over 5y, 3.9% of budgetMomentous Institute: $36,160 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetChristian Transformation Foundation West Dallas dba Serve West Dallas: $34,000 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetSalesmanship Club Charitable Golf of Dallas Inc: $26,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetOCHSNER CLINIC FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOBILE LOAVES & FISHES INC: $25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCentral Texas Food Bank Inc: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCAREFLITE: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDALLAS BAPTIST UNIVERSITY: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPlano Civic Chorus Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetTexas Cultural Trust Council: $15,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetDALLAS ARBORETUM AND BOTANICAL SOCIETY INC: $12,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Baylor Research Institute ↗
  • Who funds Southern Sector Health Initiative ↗
  • Who funds Dallas County Indigent Care ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds BAYLOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds THE CRYSTAL CHARITY BALL ↗
  • Who funds PARKLAND FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SENIOR CITIZENS OF GREATER DALLAS INC ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds YMCA OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS INC ↗
  • Who funds SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL CHARITABLE PHARMACY OF NORTH TEXAS ↗
  • Who funds KIDNEYTEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds The Family Place ↗
  • Who funds COALITION TO STRENGTHEN AMERICA'S HEALTH CARE ↗
  • Who funds THE NORTH TEXAS FAMILY HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE CONCILIO ↗
  • Who funds Ark House Foundation ↗
  • Who funds NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS INC ↗
  • Who funds JUNIOR LEAGUE OF DALLAS INC ↗
  • Who funds Texas Healthy at Home ↗
  • Who funds Swim Across America Inc ↗
  • Who funds MARCH OF DIMES INC ↗
  • Who funds HELPS INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds HOUSING FORWARD ↗
  • Who funds Texas Health Resources Foundation ↗
  • Who funds VOGEL ALCOVE ↗
  • Who funds COUNCIL FOR LIFE ↗
  • Who funds THE DALLAS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Tarrant Area Food Bank ↗
  • Who funds PEGASUS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE RYAN ANTHONY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds VETERANS CENTER OF NORTH TEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds Dallas Area Interfaith ↗
  • Who funds CARSONS VILLAGE ↗
  • Who funds Momentous Institute ↗
  • Who funds Christian Transformation Foundation West Dallas dba Serve West Dallas ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Communities Foundation of Texas IncTX46.5× affinity30 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · The Dallas Foundation · United Way of Metropolitan Dallas Inc · The Moody Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation · Texas Women's Foundation · Community Foundation of North Texas (Tax · Austin Community Foundation Inc · W P & Bulah Luse Foundation · Hillcrest Foundation · The Rosewood Foundation · The Addy Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Baylor University Medical Center funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Baylor University Medical Center. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    19report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 86 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Baylor University Medical Center’s filings →

    More from the funding graph