Skip to content

· Private foundation

Bayer Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$380k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Human Services$392kEducation$387kReligion$198kPublic Safety & Disaster$134kRecreation & Sports$118kFood & Nutrition$64kHealth$60kCrime & Legal$32kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $45k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $177k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $158k
$10,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$8.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Catholic Charities Fort Worth$100,000
Advancement Foundation$58,000
Cristo Rey High School$40,000
Catholic Relief Services$30,000
University of Notre Dame$30,000
Cistercian Preparatory School$25,000
The Archway$20,000
Tarrant Area Food Bank$12,000
Epilepsy Foundation of Texas$10,000
AFIL$10,000
Parkland Foundation$9,000
St Catherines Montessori School$9,000
University of Texas Arlington$7,000
Wikimedia Foundation$6,000
Ascend Justice$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $392k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Catholic Charities Fort Worth: $100k → 11%Catholic Charities Fort Worth: $90k → 11%Catholic Charities Fort Worth: $75k → 11%Catholic Charities Fort Worth: $75k → 11%SafeHaven of Tarrant County: $12k → 11%SafeHaven of Tarrant County: $10k → 11%SafeHaven of Tarrant County: $10k → 11%SafeHaven of Tarrant County: $10k → 11%SafeHaven of Tarrant County: $10k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
IA
IN
OH
CA
VA
MD
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 100% of Bayer Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 79% of the giving stays in TX; by stated purpose, 100%.

Bayer Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.3M · 15 repeat orgs$235k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
5

Total granted

$1.3M
$205k

Still filing today

47%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEnvironmentEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF FORT WORTH
    4× · 2022–2025 · $340k · revenue +161%
  • TA
    Tarrant Area Food Bank
    6× · 2020–2025 · $64k · revenue +26%
  • SO
    SAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY
    5× · 2020–2024 · $52k · revenue +40%

Funded once

  • TD
    The Diocese of Ft Worth
    one grant, 2021 · $83k
  • TD
    The Diocese of Fort Worth
    one grant, 2020 · $83k
  • CR
    CRISTO REY
    one grant, 2020 · $30k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Texas Trees Foundation

The mission of texas trees foundation is to improve the health of cities and people through the transformative power of trees.

—
2
Dallas-Fort Worth Hospital Council

The mission of the Dallas-Fort Worth Hospital Council is to drive evidence-based improvement in patient care and health equity throughout the region.

—
3
American Civil Liberties Union of Texas Inc

The ACLU of Texas works with communities, at the State Capitol, and in the courts to protect and advance civil rights and civil liberties for every Texan, no exceptions.

—
4
The University of TexasTexas a&M Investment Management Company

To generate superior long-term investment returns to support The University of Texas and Texas A&M University systems as they provide world-class teaching, push the boundaries of discovery, and achieve excellence in patient healthcare for…

Education
5
Texas Health Harris Methodist Hospital Fort Worth

A faith-based organization whose mission is to improve the health of the people in the communities it serves regardless of their ability to pay.

Health
6
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement
7
Texas Christian University

Texas christian university is an institution of higher education which includes nine major academic units: liberal arts, science and engineering, business, education, fine arts, communication, honors, nursing and health sciences, and the…

Education
8
Aclu Foundation of Texas Inc

The ACLU Foundation of Texas is the unyielding guardian and promoter of freedom, justice, equality and dignity of all people, particularly for those who are still fighting to secure the full exercise of their civil rights and liberties.…

Civil Rights
9
Texas Association of Business

As the state chamber of commerce, tab is the most influential and dominant voice for public policy issues affecting business in texas. through proven results-oriented advocacy and member services, tab develops a climate in texas which…

—
10
Texas Water Trade

Creating markets for innovative water resiliency projects.

Environment
11
Texas Health Resources

Through its affiliates, thr operates an integrated healthcare system with services and facilities throughout north central texas to improve the health of the people in the communities they serve.

Health
12
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Catholic Charities Diocese of Fort Worth; the most unlike its peers is University of Notre Dame du Lac. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
10/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF FORT WORTH ADVANCEMENT FOUNDATION: $216,000 · OtherCATHOLIC DIOCESE OF FORT WORTH ADVANCEMENT FOUNDATIONCristo Rey High School: $166,000 · OtherCristo Rey High SchoolCATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES: $134,000 · OtherCATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICESCistercian Preparatory School: $87,000 · OtherCistercian Preparatory SchoolThe Diocese of Ft Worth: $82,500 · OtherThe Diocese of Ft WorthThe Diocese of Fort Worth: $82,500 · OtherThe Diocese of Fort WorthTarrant Area Food Bank: $64,000 · OtherTarrant Area Food BankSt Catherines Montessori School: $40,500 · Other+9 more: $181,500 · Other+9 moreCATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF FORT WORTH: $340,000 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE…SAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY: $52,000 · Human ServicesSAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNT…University of Notre Dame du Lac: $118,000 · EducationUniversity…WIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC: $32,000 · EducationWIKIMEDIA …PARKLAND FOUNDATION: $50,000 · HealthEPILEPSY FOUNDATION OF TEXAS: $10,000 · HealthTHE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND: $8,000 · Environment
Other$1,054,000Human Services$392,000Education$150,000Health$60,000Environment$8,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF FORT WORTH: $340,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $118,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTarrant Area Food Bank: $64,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY: $52,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetPARKLAND FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetASCEND JUSTICE: $32,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC: $32,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND: $8,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF FORT WORTH ↗
  • Who funds University of Notre Dame du Lac ↗
  • Who funds Tarrant Area Food Bank ↗
  • Who funds SAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds PARKLAND FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ASCEND JUSTICE ↗
  • Who funds WIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds EPILEPSY FOUNDATION OF TEXAS ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN10× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Bayer Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bayer Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Bayer Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph