Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Bayer Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$380k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fund
0189% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Human Services$392kEducation$387kReligion$198kPublic Safety & Disaster$134kRecreation & Sports$118kFood & Nutrition$64kHealth$60kCrime & Legal$32kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $45k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $177k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $158k
$10,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$8.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Catholic Charities Fort Worth$100,000
Advancement Foundation$58,000
Cristo Rey High School$40,000
Catholic Relief Services$30,000
University of Notre Dame$30,000
Cistercian Preparatory School$25,000
The Archway$20,000
Tarrant Area Food Bank$12,000
Epilepsy Foundation of Texas$10,000
AFIL$10,000
St Catherines Montessori School$9,000
Parkland Foundation$9,000
University of Texas Arlington$7,000
Ascend Justice$6,000
Wikimedia Foundation$6,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $392k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Catholic Charities Fort Worth: $100k → 11%Catholic Charities Fort Worth: $90k → 11%Catholic Charities Fort Worth: $75k → 11%Catholic Charities Fort Worth: $75k → 11%SafeHaven of Tarrant County: $12k → 11%SafeHaven of Tarrant County: $10k → 11%SafeHaven of Tarrant County: $10k → 11%SafeHaven of Tarrant County: $10k → 11%SafeHaven of Tarrant County: $10k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
IA
IN
OH
CA
VA
MD
DC
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 100% of Bayer Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 79% of the giving stays in TX; read by stated purpose it is 100% — more of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Bayer Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.3M · 15 repeat orgs$235k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
5

Total granted

$1.3M
$205k

Still filing today

47%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEnvironmentEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF FORT WORTH
    4× · 2022–2025 · $340k · revenue +161%
  • TA
    Tarrant Area Food Bank
    6× · 2020–2025 · $64k · revenue +26%
  • SO
    SAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY
    5× · 2020–2024 · $52k · revenue +28%

Funded once

  • TD
    The Diocese of Ft Worth
    one grant, 2021 · $83k
  • TD
    The Diocese of Fort Worth
    one grant, 2020 · $83k
  • CR
    CRISTO REY
    one grant, 2020 · $30k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Texas Trees Foundation

The mission of texas trees foundation is to improve the health of cities and people through the transformative power of trees.

2
Dallas-Fort Worth Hospital Council

The mission of the Dallas-Fort Worth Hospital Council is to drive evidence-based improvement in patient care and health equity throughout the region.

3
American Civil Liberties Union of Texas Inc

The ACLU of Texas works with communities, at the State Capitol, and in the courts to protect and advance civil rights and civil liberties for every Texan, no exceptions.

4
The University of TexasTexas a&M Investment Management Company

To generate superior long-term investment returns to support The University of Texas and Texas A&M University systems as they provide world-class teaching, push the boundaries of discovery, and achieve excellence in patient healthcare for…

Education
5
Texas Health Harris Methodist Hospital Fort Worth

A faith-based organization whose mission is to improve the health of the people in the communities it serves regardless of their ability to pay.

Health
6
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement
7
Texas Christian University

Texas christian university is an institution of higher education which includes nine major academic units: liberal arts, science and engineering, business, education, fine arts, communication, honors, nursing and health sciences, and the…

Education
8
Aclu Foundation of Texas Inc

The ACLU Foundation of Texas is the unyielding guardian and promoter of freedom, justice, equality and dignity of all people, particularly for those who are still fighting to secure the full exercise of their civil rights and liberties.…

Civil Rights
9
Texas Association of Business

As the state chamber of commerce, tab is the most influential and dominant voice for public policy issues affecting business in texas. through proven results-oriented advocacy and member services, tab develops a climate in texas which…

10
Texas Water Trade

Creating markets for innovative water resiliency projects.

Environment
11
Texas Health Resources

Through its affiliates, thr operates an integrated healthcare system with services and facilities throughout north central texas to improve the health of the people in the communities they serve.

Health
12
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Catholic Charities Diocese of Fort Worth and the most unlike its peers is University of Notre Dame du Lac. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
10/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF FORT WORTH ADVANCEMENT FOUNDATION — $216,000 · OtherCATHOLIC DIOCESE OF FORT WORTH ADVANCEMENT FOUNDATIONCristo Rey High School — $166,000 · OtherCristo Rey High SchoolCATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES — $134,000 · OtherCATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICESCistercian Preparatory School — $87,000 · OtherCistercian Preparatory SchoolThe Diocese of Ft Worth — $82,500 · OtherThe Diocese of Ft WorthThe Diocese of Fort Worth — $82,500 · OtherThe Diocese of Fort WorthTarrant Area Food Bank — $64,000 · OtherTarrant Area Food BankSt Catherines Montessori School — $40,500 · Other+9 more — $181,500 · Other+9 moreCATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF FORT WORTH — $340,000 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE…SAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY — $52,000 · Human ServicesSAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNT…University of Notre Dame du Lac — $118,000 · EducationUniversity…WIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC — $32,000 · EducationWIKIMEDIA …PARKLAND FOUNDATION — $50,000 · HealthEPILEPSY FOUNDATION OF TEXAS — $10,000 · HealthTHE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND — $8,000 · Environment
Other$1,054,000Human Services$392,000Education$150,000Health$60,000Environment$8,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF FORT WORTH — $340,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac — $118,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTarrant Area Food Bank — $64,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY — $52,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetPARKLAND FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC — $32,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetASCEND JUSTICE — $32,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetTHE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND — $8,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF FORT WORTH
  • Who funds University of Notre Dame du Lac
  • Who funds Tarrant Area Food Bank
  • Who funds SAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY
  • Who funds PARKLAND FOUNDATION
  • Who funds WIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds ASCEND JUSTICE
  • Who funds EPILEPSY FOUNDATION OF TEXAS
  • Who funds THE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN10× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Bayer Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph