Skip to content

· Private foundation

Bayer Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.3M
Granted FY2024still arriving
38
Grants FY2024still arriving
11
States reached
$400k
Largest
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$1.7MEducation$840kArts & Culture$808kPhilanthropy$299kYouth Development$138kHuman Services$118kCivil Rights$114kReligion$107kOther$0
02FY2024 · 38 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k20 grants · $83k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $225k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $390k
  • $250k+2 grants · $650k
$6,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$19M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FRANCIS W PARKER SCHOOL$400,000
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF CHICAGO FOUNDATION$250,000
UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN$162,000
MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORY ART$127,500
ANTI-CRUELTY SOCIETY$50,000
CHICAGO PUBLIC MEDIA$50,000
TROY HIGH SCHOOL$30,000
Individual grant recipient$30,000
ILLINOIS HOLOCAUST MUSEUM & EDUCATION CENTER$25,000
LURIE CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION$25,000
ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE$25,000
SUSAN G KOMEN 3 DAY$20,000
COMMIT 2 CHANGE$15,000
Individual grant recipient$15,000
NAVY SEAL FOUNDATION$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $97k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%PINKY SWEAR FOUNDATION: $3k → 11%COMMIT 2 CHANGE: $16k → 17%SUNSHINE SCHOOL AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $1k → 8%COMMIT 2 CHANGE: $15k → 17%COMMIT 2 CHANGE: $10k → 17%GIFTS FOR THE HOMELESS: $5k → 14%COMMIT 2 CHANGE: $10k → 17%COMMIT 2 CHANGE: $10k → 17%COMMIT 2 CHANGE: $10k → 17%COMMIT 2 CHANGE: $3k → 17%COMMIT 2 CHANGE: $3k → 17%ASIAN HUMAN SERVICES: $5k → 14%ASIAN HUMAN SERVICES: $3k → 14%ASIAN HUMAN SERVICES: $3k → 14%COVENANT HOUSE ILLINOIS: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
WA
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
IA
IN
PA
CA
VA
MD
AZ
AR
TN
DC
AL
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.4M · 59 repeat orgs$573k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +32% since the first grant, against +27% for those funded once.

59 repeat relationships: 31 still active in FY2024, 28 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

59
63

Total granted

$4.4M
$538k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+27%

Still filing today

56%
68%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureHealthEducationPhilanthropyHuman ServicesFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    University of Michigan
    7× · 2017–2024 · $600k · revenue +202% · 49% of their budget
  • FW
    Francis W Parker School
    5× · 2019–2024 · $520k · revenue +36%
  • CP
    CHICAGO PUBLIC MEDIA INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $130k · revenue +10%

Funded once

  • CO
    CHIKAMING OPEN LANDS
    one grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue +17%
  • WJ
    WORLD JEWISH CONGRESS
    one grant, 2022 · $50k
  • TF
    TEMPLER FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement
2
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
3
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
4
National Opinion Research Center

See schedule onorc at the university of chicago conducts research and data science on critical societal issues to guide decision-making and the development of programs and public policy. our experts identify relationships and trends, and…

Social Science
5
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
6
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
7
Junior Achievement of Chicago

To inspire and prepare young people to succeed in a global economy

International
8
City of Hope

City of Hope's mission is to make hope a reality for all touched by cancer and diabetes. PLEASE SEE SCHEDULE O FOR A CONTINUATION OF OUR MISSION

Health
9
Cancer Research and Biostatistics

To help conquer cancer and other diseases through the application of biostatistical principles and innovative data management methods.

Health
10
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
11
University of Chicago

The mission of the university of chicago has been to sustain at the highest level of excellence, the communication of knowledge, the creation of knowledge and the fostering of a dynamic community of scholars and students.

Education
12
University of Chicago Medical Center

Our mission at the university of chicago medicine is to provide superior health care through rigorous research, innovative education, and comprehensive care and healing. in partnership with our colleagues, we pursue life-changing…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Tiger Woods Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Joe Namath Charitable Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

82 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 82 of the 129 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
81/82
Grantees still filing
57/82
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF CHICAGO FOUNDATION: $750,000 · OtherCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF CHICAGO FOUNDATIONUniversity of Michigan: $599,500 · OtherUniversity of MichiganMUSEUM OF CONTEMPORY ART: $352,500 · OtherMUSEUM OF CONTEMPORY ARTTROY HIGH SCHOOL: $260,000 · OtherTROY HIGH SCHOOLIndividual grant recipient: $160,000 · OtherSUSAN G KOMEN 3 DAY: $120,000 · Other+77 more: $1,209,485 · Other+77 moreFrancis W Parker School: $520,000 · EducationFrancis W Pa…+6 more: $28,160 · EducationCHICAGO PUBLIC MEDIA INC: $130,000 · Arts & CultureCHICAGO PU…HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL FOUNDATION OF ILLINOIS INC: $120,000 · Arts & CultureHOLOCAUST …NAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC: $40,000 · Arts & CultureNAVY SEAL …UNITING VOICES: $30,000 · Arts & CultureUNITING VO…Brothers for Life: $30,000 · Arts & CultureBrothers f…AMERICAN THEATRE WING INC: $15,000 · Arts & CultureThe Wick Theatre & Costume Museum Inc: $15,000 · Arts & Culture+7 more: $60,000 · Arts & Culture+7 moreMARCH OF DIMES INC: $40,000 · HealthBoca Raton Regional Hospital Inc: $35,000 · HealthIMERMAN ANGELS: $30,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $22,500 · HealthKIDS KICKING CANCER INC: $10,000 · HealthBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $7,500 · Health+6 more: $22,000 · HealthJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $105,000 · PhilanthropyClayco Foundation: $18,500 · PhilanthropyNILES ATHLETIC BOOSTERS CLUB: $17,000 · PhilanthropyPAT TILLMAN FOUNDATION: $12,000 · Philanthropy+2 more: $5,816 · PhilanthropyCHIKAMING OPEN LANDS: $100,000 · EnvironmentCOMMIT-2-CHANGE: $76,500 · Human ServicesASIAN HUMAN SERVICES: $10,000 · Human ServicesGIFTS FOR THE HOMELESS: $5,000 · Human Services+3 more: $5,000 · Human Services
Other$3,451,485Education$548,160Arts & Culture$440,000Health$167,000Philanthropy$158,316Environment$100,000Human Services$96,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUniversity of Michigan: $599,500 over 7y, 49% of budgetFrancis W Parker School: $520,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetCHICAGO PUBLIC MEDIA INC: $130,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHOLOCAUST MEMORIAL FOUNDATION OF ILLINOIS INC: $120,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $105,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCHIKAMING OPEN LANDS: $100,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetCOMMIT-2-CHANGE: $76,500 over 8y, 3.7% of budgetThe Anti-Cruelty Society: $75,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $40,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC: $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGLAAD INC: $35,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBoca Raton Regional Hospital Inc: $35,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetUNITING VOICES: $30,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetIMERMAN ANGELS: $30,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetBrothers for Life: $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF CHICAGO: $28,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $27,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $22,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWINGS PROGRAM INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetClayco Foundation: $18,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICAN THEATRE WING INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCAMP OUT FOR KIDS: $15,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetEPILEPSY FOUNDATION OF GREATER CHICAGO: $15,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetThe Wick Theatre & Costume Museum Inc: $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNICARAGUA RESOURCE NETWORK INC: $12,025 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetPAT TILLMAN FOUNDATION: $12,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetFEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Richard H Driehaus Museum: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKIDS KICKING CANCER INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPALM VALLEY ANIMAL SOCIETY FKA PALM VALLEY ANIMAL CENTER: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetASIAN HUMAN SERVICES: $10,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CHICAGO ACADEMY OF SCIENCES: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSECURE COMMUNITY NETWORK INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ARTS: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSpanish River Concerts Inc: $10,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF ISRAELI NAVY SEALS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF BERRIEN COUNTY TRAILS: $10,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRush University Medical Center: $5,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPROSPER CHICAGO INC: $5,500 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetTIGER WOODS FOUNDATION INC: $5,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Brain Tumor Association: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CAMP AIRY & CAMP LOUISE FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLYMPHOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds University of Michigan ↗
  • Who funds Francis W Parker School ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO PUBLIC MEDIA INC ↗
  • Who funds HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL FOUNDATION OF ILLINOIS INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds CHIKAMING OPEN LANDS ↗
  • Who funds COMMIT-2-CHANGE ↗
  • Who funds The Anti-Cruelty Society ↗
  • Who funds MARCH OF DIMES INC ↗
  • Who funds NAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds GLAAD INC ↗
  • Who funds Boca Raton Regional Hospital Inc ↗
  • Who funds UNITING VOICES ↗
  • Who funds IMERMAN ANGELS ↗
  • Who funds Brothers for Life ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds WINGS PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds Clayco Foundation ↗
  • Who funds NILES ATHLETIC BOOSTERS CLUB ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Polk Bros Foundation IncIL17.1× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Polk Bros Foundation Inc · Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Kovler Family Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · Circle of Service Foundation · United Way of Metropolitan Chicago Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Amg Charitable Gift Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Bayer Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bayer Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • Feeding South Florida Inc: 5% of income from government
  • The Camp Airy & Camp Louise Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Bayer Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Bayer Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 129 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Bayer Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph