Skip to content

· Public charity

Bay Area Lyme Foundation

The BAY AREA LYME FOUNDATION's mission is (1) to accelerate the development of reliable diagnostic tools for all stages of lyme disease and a cure for late stage lyme through funding innovative scientific research; and (2) to foster prevention through education and awareness building.

$1.2M
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$379k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$11MEducation$1.4MEnvironment$754kScience & Tech$156kArts & Culture$48kRecreation & Sports$40kHuman Services$28k
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $7k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $73k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $325k
  • $250k+2 grants · $750k
$75,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SAPIENT BIOANALYTICS$379,172
DUKE UNIVERSITY$370,447
TUFTS UNIVERSITY$150,000
BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY$100,000
CENTER FOR LYME ACTION$75,000
AMERICAN JUNIOR GOLF ASSOCIATION$40,000
LYME DISEASE BIOBANK FOUNDATION$20,793
LYMELIGHT FOUNDATION$12,450
TUFTS UNIVERSITY$7,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $12k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%LYMELIGHT FOUNDATION: $12k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
NY
MA
OR
CT
RI
CA
CO
VA
MD
AZ
NC
DC
LA
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$8.9M · 17 repeat orgs$2.1M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +43% since the first grant, against +2% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
21

Total granted

$8.9M
$2.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+2%

Still filing today

47%
48%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $73k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthScience & TechPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DUKE UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2021–2024 · $2.0M · revenue +1%
  • TA
    THE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND
    6× · 2018–2023 · $1.3M · revenue +57%
  • PL
    PROJECT LYME
    2× · 2019–2020 · $300k · revenue +76% · 48% of their budget

Funded once

  • AB
    AUGMENTA BIOWORKS
    one grant, 2021 · $383k
  • ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAIgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $250k · revenue +41%
  • TR
    THE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2021 · $250k · revenue -14%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
2
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
3
Trustees of Boston University

Organization's mission: boston university is an international, comprehensive, private research university, committed to educating students to be reflective, resourceful individuals ready to live, adapt, and lead in an interconnected world.…

—
4
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
5
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
6
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
7
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
8
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
9
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences

We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.

Education
10
Worcester Polytechnic Institute

Wpi transforms lives, turns knowledge into action to confront global challenges, and revolutionizes stem through distinctive and inclusive education, projects and research. (http://www.wpi.edu/about/mission.html)

—
11
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
12
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Trustees of Tufts College; the most unlike its peers is Precision Healthcare Ecosystem. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/25
Grantees still filing
15/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DUKE UNIVERSITY: $2,043,611 · EducationDUKE UNIVERSITYTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $1,806,206 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERS…THE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND: $1,263,826 · EducationTHE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUNDCOLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $348,795 · EducationTrustees of Tufts College: $257,000 · EducationPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $250,000 · EducationICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI: $250,000 · EducationTHE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY: $250,000 · Education+5 more: $551,016 · Education+5 moreUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO: $1,552,681 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCOSAPIENT BIOANALYTICS: $1,073,700 · OtherSAPIENT BIOANALYTICSTEXAS A&M AGRILIFE RESEARCH: $452,468 · OtherTEXAS A&M AGRILIFE RESEARCHAUGMENTA BIOWORKS: $383,000 · OtherAUGMENTA BIOWORKSNORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY: $294,928 · OtherNORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITYMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED: $283,713 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL: $240,209 · Other+14 more: $1,117,850 · Other+14 morePROJECT LYME: $300,000 · HealthThe Broad Institute Inc: $269,912 · HealthPRECISION HEALTHCARE ECOSYSTEM: $25,000 · HealthTHE TRANSLATIONAL GENOMICS RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $23,625 · Health+1 more: $20,793 · HealthGENEVA FOUNDATION: $150,000 · Science & TechINSTITUTE FOR SYSTEMS BIOLOGY: $104,983 · Science & TechGORDON RESEARCH CONFERENCES INC: $21,000 · Science & TechAmerican Junior Golf Association Inc: $40,000 · Recreation & SportsALEX HUDSON LYME DISEASE FOUNDATION: $20,000 · PhilanthropyLymeLight Foundation: $12,450 · Human Services
Education$7,020,454Other$5,398,549Health$639,330Science & Tech$275,983Recreation & Sports$40,000Philanthropy$20,000Human Services$12,450

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY: $2,043,611 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $1,806,206 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND: $1,263,826 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCOLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $348,795 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetPROJECT LYME: $300,000 over 2y, 48% of budgetThe Broad Institute Inc: $269,912 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTrustees of Tufts College: $257,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $250,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI: $250,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY: $250,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBRANDEIS UNIVERSITY: $200,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR LYME ACTION: $175,000 over 3y, 29% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $170,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGENEVA FOUNDATION: $150,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR SYSTEMS BIOLOGY: $104,983 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $80,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCornell University: $71,016 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Junior Golf Association Inc: $40,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCENTER FOR OPEN DATA ENTERPRISE INC: $30,000 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetPRECISION HEALTHCARE ECOSYSTEM: $25,000 over 1y, 47% of budgetTHE TRANSLATIONAL GENOMICS RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $23,625 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGORDON RESEARCH CONFERENCES INC: $21,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLYME DISEASE BIOBANK FOUNDATION: $20,793 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetALEX HUDSON LYME DISEASE FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 86% of budgetLymeLight Foundation: $12,450 over 1y, 1.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds THE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND ↗
  • Who funds COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT LYME ↗
  • Who funds The Broad Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds Trustees of Tufts College ↗
  • Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
  • Who funds ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI ↗
  • Who funds THE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR LYME ACTION ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
  • Who funds GENEVA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUTE FOR SYSTEMS BIOLOGY ↗
  • Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Cornell University ↗
  • Who funds American Junior Golf Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR OPEN DATA ENTERPRISE INC ↗
  • Who funds PRECISION HEALTHCARE ECOSYSTEM ↗
  • Who funds THE TRANSLATIONAL GENOMICS RESEARCH INSTITUTE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

University of PittsburghPA17.4× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: University of Pittsburgh · University of Miami · The Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York · Johns Hopkins University · Vanderbilt University Medical Center · Northwestern University · President and Fellows of Harvard College · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Bay Area Lyme Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bay Area Lyme Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • The Broad Institute Inc: 19% of income from government
  • Trustees of Tufts College: 13% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
  • Brandeis University: 9% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Bay Area Lyme Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Bay Area Lyme Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 45 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Bay Area Lyme’s filings →

More from the funding graph