Skip to content

· Private foundation

Barney II Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$15k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0185% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$171kEducation$142kInternational$44kCommunity Improvement$34kCivil Rights$34kRecreation & Sports$18kHousing & Shelter$12kYouth Development$11kOther$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $5k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$3,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
INTERNATIONAL GENEROSITY FUND$10,300
MEMPHIS TEACHER RESIDENCY INC$3,000
CALVIN CHRISTIAN SCHOOL$1,200
Individual grant recipient$769
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%RIVER CITY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $6k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
CO
KY
DE
TN
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

33%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$183k · 18 repeat orgs$368k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +16% since the first grant, against +6% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
75

Total granted

$183k
$365k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+6%

Still filing today

6%
21%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’24’25
EducationYouth DevelopmentInternationalCrime & LegalHousing & ShelterHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IG
    INTERNATIONAL GENEROSITY FUND
    2× · 2024–2025 · $28k
  • BF
    BRADY FAITH CENTER
    4× · 2020–2024 · $26k
  • LS
    LASALLE STREET CHURCH
    3× · 2020–2022 · $25k

Funded once

  • WS
    WEST SIDE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL
    one grant, 2021 · $22k
  • VN
    Viva Network North America
    one grant, 2022 · $22k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $17k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christian Leaders for Africa Inc

Christian leaders from africa promotes christian theological training & education of local leaders in kenya and throughout africa. it invests in undergraduate, masters, and phd scholarships, faculty support for african professors and…

Religion
2
Christian Life Preparatory School

Christian Life Prepatory School provided 12 months of college prepatory educational instruction for 360 students in grades K through 12.

Education
3
Manna University

Manna University is a biblical higher education institution dedicated to educating, equipping, and empowering emerging leaders to change the world.

Education
4
Arborbrook Christian Academy

Arborbrook Christian Academy partners with parents to equip, empower, and encourage students to cultivate godly character, pursue life-long learning, and love the Lord Jesus Christ.

Education
5
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

—
6
Valley Christian School

Valley christian school exists to partner with christian families who desire educational excellence, taught through a biblical worldview, so their children will be prepared for a lifetime of faithfulness and service to jesus christ.

—
7
Jerusalem University College

Jerusalem University College creates opportunities for students to deepen their knowledge of God and His Word through immersive study of the ancient and modern contexts of Israel and the surrounding regions, equipping them for academia,…

International
8
Landmark Christian School

Landmark christian school partners with christian families by equipping college-bound students to embrace a christ-centered worldview, grow as servant leaders, and steward god's unique purpose for their lives.

—
9
Reformed University Inc

Provide education in theology, divinity, religious education, ministerial training, business and organizational leadership.

Education
10
Banner Christian School Inc

To operate a christian school serving grades k-12

Education
11
Yours Humanly

Yours Humanly (YH) transforms the lives of children in need around the world by providing access to quality education and equitable resources. Through its two flagship initiatives, Coloring Futures and Bridging Gaps, YH has completed 34…

Education
12
Leadership for Development

The mission of the organization is to provide educational and community development resources in developing countries throughout the world; provide aid to improvished, underprivileged, disadvantaged, sick and homeless or need persons…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Young Life; the most unlike its peers is Human Rights Action Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 95 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
9/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

INTERNATIONAL GENEROSITY FUND: $27,900 · OtherINTERNATIONAL GENEROSITY FUNDBRADY FAITH CENTER: $25,853 · OtherLASALLE STREET CHURCH: $25,100 · OtherWEST SIDE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $22,250 · OtherViva Network North America: $21,673 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $17,000 · OtherBREAKTHROUGH URBAN MINISTRIES: $16,200 · Other+73 more: $329,025 · Other+73 moreON POINT FOR COLLEGE INC: $6,700 · EducationSEATTLE PACIFIC UNIVERSITY: $4,000 · EducationMEMPHIS TEACHER RESIDENCY INC: $3,000 · EducationPURSUE SCHOLARS NFP: $2,604 · EducationCHAMPIONS FOR LITERACY: $2,600 · EducationCornerstone Academy co Richard Van der Molen: $2,500 · EducationYOUNG LIFE: $7,175 · Youth DevelopmentORENDA SPRINGS: $6,250 · Youth DevelopmentBUILDING MEN PROGRAM INC: $1,000 · Youth DevelopmentLAWNDALE CHRISTIAN LEGAL CENTER: $10,000 · Crime & LegalKIJABE CHILDREN'S EDUCATIONAL FUND INC: $5,225 · InternationalASSOCIATION FOR A MORE JUST SOCIETY -US: $3,110 · InternationalWORLD VISION INC: $1,000 · InternationalA TINY HOME FOR GOOD INC: $6,250 · Housing & ShelterRiver City Community Development Center: $6,000 · Human Services
Other$485,001Education$21,404Youth Development$14,425Crime & Legal$10,000International$9,335Housing & Shelter$6,250Human Services$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLAWNDALE CHRISTIAN LEGAL CENTER: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $7,175 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetON POINT FOR COLLEGE INC: $6,700 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetORENDA SPRINGS: $6,250 over 1y, 10% of budgetA TINY HOME FOR GOOD INC: $6,250 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetRiver City Community Development Center: $6,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetKIJABE CHILDREN'S EDUCATIONAL FUND INC: $5,225 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSouth Sudan Villages Clinic Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 9.7% of budgetSEATTLE PACIFIC UNIVERSITY: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCalvin Christian School of Minneapolis: $3,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetASSOCIATION FOR A MORE JUST SOCIETY -US: $3,110 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMEMPHIS TEACHER RESIDENCY INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPURSUE SCHOLARS NFP: $2,604 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCHAMPIONS FOR LITERACY: $2,600 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCornerstone Academy co Richard Van der Molen: $2,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetHUMAN RIGHTS ACTION CENTER: $2,500 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetSERVE SYRACUSE INC: $2,073 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetWORLD VISION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBUILDING MEN PROGRAM INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LAWNDALE CHRISTIAN LEGAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
  • Who funds ON POINT FOR COLLEGE INC ↗
  • Who funds ORENDA SPRINGS ↗
  • Who funds A TINY HOME FOR GOOD INC ↗
  • Who funds River City Community Development Center ↗
  • Who funds KIJABE CHILDREN'S EDUCATIONAL FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds South Sudan Villages Clinic Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Charity Bridge FundCT16.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Charity Bridge Fund · Central New York Community Foundation Inc · The Chicago Community Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Barney II Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Barney II Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Barney II Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Barney II Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 95 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Barney II’s filings →

    More from the funding graph