Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Barney II Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$15k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
0185% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Religion$171kEducation$142kInternational$44kCommunity Improvement$34kCivil Rights$34kRecreation & Sports$18kHousing & Shelter$12kYouth Development$11kOther$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $5k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$3,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
INTERNATIONAL GENEROSITY FUND$10,300
MEMPHIS TEACHER RESIDENCY INC$3,000
CALVIN CHRISTIAN SCHOOL$1,200
Individual grant recipient$769
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%RIVER CITY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $6k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
CO
KY
DE
TN
DC
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

29%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$158k · 15 repeat orgs$394k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +16% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

15 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
83

Total granted

$158k
$391k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
0%

Still filing today

7%
19%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’24’25
EducationYouth DevelopmentInternationalCrime & LegalHousing & ShelterHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IG
    INTERNATIONAL GENEROSITY FUND
    2× · 2024–2025 · $28k
  • LS
    LASALLE STREET CHURCH
    3× · 2020–2022 · $25k
  • BF
    BRADY FAITH CENTER
    3× · 2020–2024 · $20k

Funded once

  • WS
    WEST SIDE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL
    one grant, 2021 · $22k
  • VN
    Viva Network North America
    one grant, 2022 · $22k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $17k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christian Leaders for Africa Inc

Christian leaders from africa promotes christian theological training & education of local leaders in kenya and throughout africa. it invests in undergraduate, masters, and phd scholarships, faculty support for african professors and…

Religion
2
Christian Life Preparatory School

Christian Life Prepatory School provided 12 months of college prepatory educational instruction for 360 students in grades K through 12.

Education
3
Manna University

Manna University is a biblical higher education institution dedicated to educating, equipping, and empowering emerging leaders to change the world.

Education
4
Arborbrook Christian Academy

Arborbrook Christian Academy partners with parents to equip, empower, and encourage students to cultivate godly character, pursue life-long learning, and love the Lord Jesus Christ.

Education
5
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

6
Valley Christian School

Valley christian school exists to partner with christian families who desire educational excellence, taught through a biblical worldview, so their children will be prepared for a lifetime of faithfulness and service to jesus christ.

7
Jerusalem University College

Jerusalem University College creates opportunities for students to deepen their knowledge of God and His Word through immersive study of the ancient and modern contexts of Israel and the surrounding regions, equipping them for academia,…

International
8
Landmark Christian School

Landmark christian school partners with christian families by equipping college-bound students to embrace a christ-centered worldview, grow as servant leaders, and steward god's unique purpose for their lives.

9
Reformed University Inc

Provide education in theology, divinity, religious education, ministerial training, business and organizational leadership.

Education
10
Banner Christian School Inc

To operate a christian school serving grades k-12

Education
11
Yours Humanly

Yours Humanly (YH) transforms the lives of children in need around the world by providing access to quality education and equitable resources. Through its two flagship initiatives, Coloring Futures and Bridging Gaps, YH has completed 34…

Education
12
Leadership for Development

The mission of the organization is to provide educational and community development resources in developing countries throughout the world; provide aid to improvished, underprivileged, disadvantaged, sick and homeless or need persons…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Young Life and the most unlike its peers is Human Rights Action Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 100 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
8/19
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

INTERNATIONAL GENEROSITY FUND — $27,900 · OtherINTERNATIONAL GENEROSITY FUNDLASALLE STREET CHURCH — $25,100 · OtherWEST SIDE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL — $22,250 · OtherViva Network North America — $21,673 · OtherBRADY FAITH CENTER — $19,685 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $17,000 · OtherBREAKTHROUGH URBAN MINISTRIES — $16,200 · Other+78 more — $335,193 · Other+78 moreON POINT FOR COLLEGE INC — $6,700 · EducationSEATTLE PACIFIC UNIVERSITY — $4,000 · EducationMEMPHIS TEACHER RESIDENCY INC — $3,000 · EducationPURSUE SCHOLARS NFP — $2,604 · EducationCHAMPIONS FOR LITERACY — $2,600 · EducationCornerstone Academy co Richard Van der Molen — $2,500 · EducationYOUNG LIFE — $7,175 · Youth DevelopmentORENDA SPRINGS — $6,250 · Youth DevelopmentBUILDING MEN PROGRAM INC — $1,000 · Youth DevelopmentLAWNDALE CHRISTIAN LEGAL CENTER — $10,000 · Crime & LegalKIJABE CHILDREN'S EDUCATIONAL FUND INC — $5,225 · InternationalASSOCIATION FOR A MORE JUST SOCIETY -US — $3,110 · InternationalWORLD VISION INC — $1,000 · InternationalA TINY HOME FOR GOOD INC — $6,250 · Housing & ShelterRiver City Community Development Center — $6,000 · Human Services
Other$485,001Education$21,404Youth Development$14,425Crime & Legal$10,000International$9,335Housing & Shelter$6,250Human Services$6,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetLAWNDALE CHRISTIAN LEGAL CENTER — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYOUNG LIFE — $7,175 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetON POINT FOR COLLEGE INC — $6,700 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetA TINY HOME FOR GOOD INC — $6,250 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetORENDA SPRINGS — $6,250 over 1y, 10% of budgetRiver City Community Development Center — $6,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetKIJABE CHILDREN'S EDUCATIONAL FUND INC — $5,225 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSouth Sudan Villages Clinic Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 9.7% of budgetSEATTLE PACIFIC UNIVERSITY — $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCalvin Christian School of Minneapolis — $3,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetASSOCIATION FOR A MORE JUST SOCIETY -US — $3,110 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMEMPHIS TEACHER RESIDENCY INC — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPURSUE SCHOLARS NFP — $2,604 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCHAMPIONS FOR LITERACY — $2,600 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHUMAN RIGHTS ACTION CENTER — $2,500 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetCornerstone Academy co Richard Van der Molen — $2,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSERVE SYRACUSE INC — $2,073 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetWORLD VISION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBUILDING MEN PROGRAM INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LAWNDALE CHRISTIAN LEGAL CENTER
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE
  • Who funds ON POINT FOR COLLEGE INC
  • Who funds A TINY HOME FOR GOOD INC
  • Who funds ORENDA SPRINGS
  • Who funds River City Community Development Center
  • Who funds KIJABE CHILDREN'S EDUCATIONAL FUND INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Charity Bridge FundCT16.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Charity Bridge Fund · Central New York Community Foundation Inc · The Chicago Community Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Barney II Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Barney II Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Barney II Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 100 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph