Skip to content
Atrium Medical Center at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Atrium Medical Center

We care.

$258k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$113k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$2.4MCommunity Improvement$1.9MPhilanthropy$112kHuman Services$65kYouth Development$25kHousing & Shelter$20kArts & Culture$15kFood & Nutrition$7kOther$0
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 5 grants below total $204,855, the rows itemized in this filing. The $258,037 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $53,182 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $18k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $172k
$18,375
Median grant
1
States reached
$275M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MIAMI VALLEY HOSPITAL$112,964
PREMIER COMMUNITY HEALTH$58,711
REACH OUT MONTGOMERY COUNTY$18,375
MIAMI VALLEY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$8,995
UVMC FOUNDATION$5,810
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–20, $28k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ELIZABETHS NEW LIFE CENTER INC: $8k → 14%HOMEFULL: $12k → 14%HOMEFULL: $8k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

56%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.5M · 12 repeat orgs$2.0M to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
11

Total granted

$2.5M
$2.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+2%
+15%

Still filing today

92%
91%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MV
    MIAMI VALLEY HOSPITAL
    8× · 2017–2024 · $606k · revenue +96%
  • AM
    ATRIUM MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION
    4× · 2017–2020 · $160k · revenue +34%
  • MV
    MIAMI VALLEY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
    7× · 2017–2024 · $65k · revenue +108%

Funded once

  • CD
    CITYWIDE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $1.8M · revenue +254%
  • WC
    Warren County Community Services Incgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $59k · revenue +62%
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF WEST CHESTERLIBERT
    one grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue -68%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fidelity Health Care

We care. we teach. we innovate. we serve.

Health
2
Atrium Medical Center

We care. we teach. we innovate. we serve.

Health
3
Ohio Hills Health Services

Ohio hills health services is a non-profit health care operation, organized by communities in eastern ohio to promote healthy lifestyles and to provide preventative and comprehensive medical and dental care for area residents. the primary…

—
4
Ohio United Way

To strengthen the capacity of United Ways across Ohio and to advance the common good for Ohioans.

Philanthropy
5
Dayton Area Chamber of Commerce

The chamber is a member association designed to be the leading advocate for the business community of the greater dayton region. its mission is to work shoulder to shoulder with businesses to help them succeed.

—
6
Good Samaritan Hospital

We will improve the health of the communities we serve with others who share our commitment to provide high-quality, cost-competitive healthcare services.

—
7
Upper Valley Medical Center

We care. we teach. we innovate. we serve.

Health
8
Uc Health Foundation

Uc health foundation is the fundraising entity of the uc healthcare system. our mission is to support groundbreaking work that takes place across the academic health center to provide the best in prevention, treatment, education and…

Health
9
The Healthcare Connection Inc

To provide quality, culturally sensitive and accessible primary health care services focusing on the medically underserved, underinsured, and uninsured residing in northern hamilton county and surrounding areas.

—
10
Compunet Clinical Laboratories Llc

Your trusted laboratory partner... every patient. every result. every time.

—
11
Mount Carmel Health System

We, mount carmel health system and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. mount carmel health system is a member of trinity health.

—
12
OhioHealth Corporation

To improve the health of those we serve.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The United Way of the Greater Dayton Area; the most unlike its peers is Reach Out of Montgomery County. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
14/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ONEFIFTEEN RECOVERY: $1,105,004 · HealthONEFIFTEEN RECOVERYMIAMI VALLEY HOSPITAL: $605,713 · HealthMIAMI VALLEY HOSPITALATRIUM MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $160,456 · HealthATRIUM MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATIONREACH OUT OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY: $140,822 · HealthREACH OUT OF MONTGOMERY COUNTYPREMIER COMMUNITY HEALTH: $119,462 · HealthPREMIER COMMUNITY HEALTH+3 more: $96,814 · HealthCITYWIDE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $1,834,936 · Community ImprovementCITYWIDE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION+1 more: $10,000 · Community ImprovementCITY OF MIDDLETOWN HEALTH DEPARTMENT: $252,829 · OtherWarren County Community Services Inc: $58,500 · OtherTHE UNITED WAY OF THE GREATER DAYTON AREA: $12,000 · Other+4 more: $24,766 · OtherDAYTON FOUNDATION DEPOSITORY: $60,600 · PhilanthropyTHE DAYTON FOUNDATION: $20,640 · PhilanthropyUnited Way of Greater Cincinnati: $12,750 · PhilanthropyUVMC FOUNDATION: $12,673 · PhilanthropyHOMEFULL: $19,620 · Human ServicesELIZABETH'S NEW LIFE CENTER INC: $8,000 · Human ServicesBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF WEST CHESTERLIBERT: $25,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE DAYTON ART INSTITUTE: $15,019 · Arts & Culture
Health$2,228,271Community Improvement$1,844,936Other$348,095Philanthropy$106,663Human Services$27,620Youth Development$25,000Arts & Culture$15,019

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetONEFIFTEEN RECOVERY: $1,105,004 over 5y, 6.3% of budgetMIAMI VALLEY HOSPITAL: $605,713 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetATRIUM MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $160,456 over 4y, 4.8% of budgetREACH OUT OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY: $140,822 over 8y, 12% of budgetPREMIER COMMUNITY HEALTH: $119,462 over 3y, 8.6% of budgetMIAMI VALLEY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $64,814 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetDAYTON FOUNDATION DEPOSITORY: $60,600 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetWarren County Community Services Inc: $58,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF WEST CHESTERLIBERT: $25,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTHE GALA OF HOPE FOUNDATION INC: $22,000 over 2y, 3.9% of budgetTHE DAYTON FOUNDATION: $20,640 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHOMEFULL: $19,620 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE DAYTON ART INSTITUTE: $15,019 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUnited Way of Greater Cincinnati: $12,750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUVMC FOUNDATION: $12,673 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTHE UNITED WAY OF THE GREATER DAYTON AREA: $12,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY BUILDING INSTITUTE MIDDLETOWN INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetWESTCARE OHIO INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetELIZABETH'S NEW LIFE CENTER INC: $8,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetUNITED WAY OF WARREN COUNTY OHIO: $6,456 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetWesley Community Center Inc: $6,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetThe Big Hoopla Inc: $5,250 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Miami Valley HospitalUpper Valley Medical …The Dayton FoundationDayton Foundation Dep…The Greater Cincinnat…Synchrony FoundationMathile Family Founda…Dayton Foundation Plu…Good Samaritan Hospit…The Dayton Power and …The United Way of the…Greene County Communi…
Miami Valley HospitalOH32.7× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Miami Valley Hospital · Upper Valley Medical Center · The Dayton Foundation · Dayton Foundation Depository · The Greater Cincinnati Foundation · Synchrony Foundation · Mathile Family Foundation · Dayton Foundation Plus Inc · Good Samaritan Hospital · The Dayton Power and Light Company Foundation Dba Aes Ohio Foundation · The United Way of the Greater Dayton Area · Greene County Community Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Atrium Medical Center funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Atrium Medical Center. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Atrium Medical Center’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home