Skip to content

· Private foundation

Arnold Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$48k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$178kHealth$166kYouth Development$56kHuman Services$46kHousing & Shelter$46kAnimals$23kArts & Culture$22kInternational$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$4,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$583k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
STEPS TO HOPE$7,000
THE MARLEY PROJECT$5,000
ROTARY CLUB OF TRYON FOUNDATION$4,000
UPSTATE COMMUNITY HOSPICE HOUSE$4,000
THE CARE RING$4,000
ST JUDES CHILDRENS HOSPITAL$4,000
CHARLOTTE FAMILY HOUSING$4,000
FOOTHILLS HUMANE SOCIETY$4,000
Individual grant recipient$4,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
EVERHART MUSEUM$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $37k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 35% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CHARLOTTE FAMILY HOUSING: $4k → 10%SYNERGY IN ACTION: $4k → 13%ROTARY CLUB OF TRYON FOUNDATION: $4k → 13%ROTARY CLUB OF TRYON FOUNDATION: $4k → 13%CHARLOTTE FAMILY HOUSING: $3k → 10%CHARLOTTE FAMILY HOUSING: $3k → 10%CHARLOTTE FAMILY HOUSING: $3k → 10%CHARLOTTE FAMILY HOUSING: $3k → 10%CHARLOTTE FAMILY HOUSING: $2k → 10%CHARLOTTE FAMILY HOUSING: $2k → 10%CHARLOTTE FAMILY HOUSING: $2k → 10%CHARLOTTE FAMILY HOUSING: $2k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$527k · 26 repeat orgs$38k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +39% since the first grant, against +7% for those funded once.

26 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
9

Total granted

$527k
$34k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+7%

Still filing today

46%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationArts & CultureInternationalAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TM
    THE MARLEY PROJECT IN
    9× · 2017–2025 · $40k · revenue +13% · 37% of their budget
  • ST
    STEPS TO HOPE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $38k · revenue +328%
  • CR
    Care Ring Inc
    8× · 2017–2025 · $33k · revenue +165%

Funded once

  • VH
    Veterans Healing Farm
    one grant, 2024 · $4k · revenue -27%
  • SI
    SYNERGY IN ACTION INC
    one grant, 2024 · $4k · revenue +7%
  • TF
    TRYON FINE ARTS
    one grant, 2024 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Humane Society of Charlotte Inc

Humane Society of Charlotte mission is to champion the wellbeing of companion animals and strengthen their bond with the people who know, love, and need them.

Animals
2
Developmental Disabilities Management Assistance Inc

Carolina hill provides safe and caring emergency shelter and supportive services to homeless families focusing efforts to achieve rapid re-housing and developing skills and resources to maintain it.

Human Services
3
Carolina Community Care Inc

The mission of hospice & community care is to give hope, comfort, and compassion to those that need it most. hospice & community care is a nonprofit healthcare organization providing hospice and palliative care to residents of york,…

—
4
Children's Home Society of North Carolina Inc

The Children's Home Society of North Carolina's mission is to promote the right of every child to a permanent, safe, and loving family.

Human Services
5
Caramore Community

To empower adults living with severe and persistent mental illness in north carolina with the tools to lead meaningful and independent lives.

—
6
Hospitality House of Charlotte

To provide the comforts of home for families of seriously ill loved ones by offering affordable accommodations in the heart of charlotte's medical community.

Health
7
Carolina Family Health Centers Inc

Carolina Family Health Centers, Inc. provides accessible and affordable health care with excellence...where patients come FIRST

—
8
Hope Harbor Home Inc

Hope Harbor Home strives to break the cycle of domestic and sexual violence in Brunswick County, North Carolina.

—
9
The Harvest Center of Charlotte Inc

Create a community where individuals impacted by homelessness, poverty, and unemployment are empowered through our transitional programs and transformed by the love and ministry of Jesus Christ.

Food & Nutrition
10
Charlotte Behavioral Health Care Inc

Partnering to instill hope, inspire growth and embrace life.

Health
11
The Shepherds Center of Charlotte

The Shepherds Center of Charlotte enriches the lives of older adults by providing a network of support to increase social connection, expand access to critical resources, and combat the negative effects of isolation.

—
12
Safe Harbor of Nc Inc

Safe Harbor provides a faith-based community for rebuilding, renewing, and recovery. We work together with volunteers and other nonprofit organizations to provide a wide range of services to those experiencing homelessness, single mothers,…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Steps to Hope Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Marley Project in. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/18
Grantees still filing
16/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS: $56,000 · OtherBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERSSTEPS TO HOPE INC: $38,000 · OtherSTEPS TO HOPE INCHOSPICE OF CAROLINA FOOTHILLS: $32,000 · OtherHOSPICE OF CAROLINA FOOTHILLSIndividual grant recipient: $29,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $25,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientHOSPICE & PALLIATIVE CARE-: $20,000 · OtherHOSPICE & PALLIATIVE CARE-Mens Shelter of Charlotte Inc: $19,000 · OtherMens Shelter of Charlotte IncIndividual grant recipient: $14,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $14,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $13,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $12,000 · Other+13 more: $68,400 · Other+13 moreCare Ring Inc: $33,000 · HealthCare Ring IncCHARLOTTE RESCUE MISSION: $28,000 · HealthCHARLOTTE RESCUE MI…VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE: $20,000 · HealthVOLUNTEERS IN MEDIC…CHILDRENS SVC CTR OF WYOM VALLEY INC: $16,000 · HealthCHILDRENS SVC CTR O…THE MARLEY PROJECT IN: $40,000 · EducationTHE MARLE…KING'S COLLEGE: $8,000 · EducationKING'S CO…Charlotte Family Housing: $24,000 · Human ServicesROTARY CLUB OF TRYON FOUNDATION INC: $8,400 · Human ServicesSYNERGY IN ACTION INC: $4,400 · Human ServicesEVERHART MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY SCIENCE AND ART: $18,000 · Arts & CultureROOF ABOVE INC: $3,000 · Arts & CultureFoothills Humane Society Inc: $20,000 · AnimalsHELPING HANDS INC: $6,000 · International
Other$340,400Health$97,000Education$48,000Human Services$36,800Arts & Culture$21,000Animals$20,000International$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE MARLEY PROJECT IN: $40,000 over 9y, 37% of budgetSTEPS TO HOPE INC: $38,000 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetCare Ring Inc: $33,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetCHARLOTTE RESCUE MISSION: $28,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCharlotte Family Housing: $24,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetVOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE: $20,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetFoothills Humane Society Inc: $20,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetMens Shelter of Charlotte Inc: $19,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetEVERHART MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY SCIENCE AND ART: $18,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetCHILDRENS SVC CTR OF WYOM VALLEY INC: $16,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetROTARY CLUB OF TRYON FOUNDATION INC: $8,400 over 2y, 5.8% of budgetKING'S COLLEGE: $8,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetHELPING HANDS INC: $6,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetVeterans Healing Farm: $4,400 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSYNERGY IN ACTION INC: $4,400 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSPARTANBURG SCIENCE CENTER: $4,400 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetPolk County Community Foundation Inc: $4,400 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetROOF ABOVE INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE MARLEY PROJECT IN ↗
  • Who funds STEPS TO HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds Care Ring Inc ↗
  • Who funds CHARLOTTE RESCUE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds Charlotte Family Housing ↗
  • Who funds VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE ↗
  • Who funds Foothills Humane Society Inc ↗
  • Who funds Mens Shelter of Charlotte Inc ↗
  • Who funds EVERHART MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY SCIENCE AND ART ↗
  • Who funds CHILDRENS SVC CTR OF WYOM VALLEY INC ↗
  • Who funds ROTARY CLUB OF TRYON FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds KING'S COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds HELPING HANDS INC ↗
  • Who funds Veterans Healing Farm ↗
  • Who funds SYNERGY IN ACTION INC ↗
  • Who funds SPARTANBURG SCIENCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Polk County Community Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds ROOF ABOVE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Duke Energy FoundationNC17.9× affinity8 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Duke Energy Foundation · The Cannon Foundation Inc · Foundation for the Carolinas · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Arnold Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Arnold Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Arnold’s filings →

    More from the funding graph