Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Arnold Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$48k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$178kHealth$166kYouth Development$56kHuman Services$46kHousing & Shelter$46kAnimals$23kArts & Culture$22kInternational$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$4,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$583k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
STEPS TO HOPE$7,000
THE MARLEY PROJECT$5,000
UPSTATE COMMUNITY HOSPICE HOUSE$4,000
ROTARY CLUB OF TRYON FOUNDATION$4,000
CHARLOTTE FAMILY HOUSING$4,000
FOOTHILLS HUMANE SOCIETY$4,000
Individual grant recipient$4,000
ST JUDES CHILDRENS HOSPITAL$4,000
THE CARE RING$4,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
EVERHART MUSEUM$2,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $37k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 35% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SYNERGY IN ACTION: $4k → 13%ROTARY CLUB OF TRYON FOUNDATION: $4k → 13%CHARLOTTE FAMILY HOUSING: $4k → 10%ROTARY CLUB OF TRYON FOUNDATION: $4k → 13%CHARLOTTE FAMILY HOUSING: $3k → 10%CHARLOTTE FAMILY HOUSING: $3k → 10%CHARLOTTE FAMILY HOUSING: $3k → 10%CHARLOTTE FAMILY HOUSING: $3k → 10%CHARLOTTE FAMILY HOUSING: $2k → 10%CHARLOTTE FAMILY HOUSING: $2k → 10%CHARLOTTE FAMILY HOUSING: $2k → 10%CHARLOTTE FAMILY HOUSING: $2k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$527k · 26 repeat orgs$38k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +39% since the first grant, against +7% for the ones you funded once.

26 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
9

Total granted

$527k
$34k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+7%

Still filing today

46%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationArts & CultureInternationalAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TM
    THE MARLEY PROJECT IN
    9× · 2017–2025 · $40k · revenue +13% · 37% of their budget
  • ST
    STEPS TO HOPE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $38k · revenue +328%
  • CR
    Care Ring Inc
    8× · 2017–2025 · $33k · revenue +165%

Funded once

  • TF
    TRYON FINE ARTS
    one grant, 2024 · $4k
  • OH
    OPERATION HOPE
    one grant, 2024 · $4k
  • VH
    Veterans Healing Farm
    one grant, 2024 · $4k · revenue 0%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Humane Society of Charlotte Inc

Humane Society of Charlotte mission is to champion the wellbeing of companion animals and strengthen their bond with the people who know, love, and need them.

Animals
2
Developmental Disabilities Management Assistance Inc

Carolina hill provides safe and caring emergency shelter and supportive services to homeless families focusing efforts to achieve rapid re-housing and developing skills and resources to maintain it.

Human Services
3
Carolina Community Care Inc

The mission of hospice & community care is to give hope, comfort, and compassion to those that need it most. hospice & community care is a nonprofit healthcare organization providing hospice and palliative care to residents of york,…

4
Children's Home Society of North Carolina Inc

The Children's Home Society of North Carolina's mission is to promote the right of every child to a permanent, safe, and loving family.

Human Services
5
Caramore Community

To empower adults living with severe and persistent mental illness in north carolina with the tools to lead meaningful and independent lives.

6
Hospitality House of Charlotte

To provide the comforts of home for families of seriously ill loved ones by offering affordable accommodations in the heart of charlotte's medical community.

Health
7
Carolina Family Health Centers Inc

Carolina Family Health Centers, Inc. provides accessible and affordable health care with excellence...where patients come FIRST

8
Hope Harbor Home Inc

Hope Harbor Home strives to break the cycle of domestic and sexual violence in Brunswick County, North Carolina.

9
The Harvest Center of Charlotte Inc

Create a community where individuals impacted by homelessness, poverty, and unemployment are empowered through our transitional programs and transformed by the love and ministry of Jesus Christ.

Food & Nutrition
10
Charlotte Behavioral Health Care Inc

Partnering to instill hope, inspire growth and embrace life.

Health
11
The Shepherds Center of Charlotte

The Shepherds Center of Charlotte enriches the lives of older adults by providing a network of support to increase social connection, expand access to critical resources, and combat the negative effects of isolation.

12
Safe Harbor of Nc Inc

Safe Harbor provides a faith-based community for rebuilding, renewing, and recovery. We work together with volunteers and other nonprofit organizations to provide a wide range of services to those experiencing homelessness, single mothers,…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Steps to Hope Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Marley Project in. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/18
Grantees still filing
15/18
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS — $56,000 · OtherBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERSSTEPS TO HOPE INC — $38,000 · OtherSTEPS TO HOPE INCHOSPICE OF CAROLINA FOOTHILLS — $32,000 · OtherHOSPICE OF CAROLINA FOOTHILLSIndividual grant recipient — $29,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $25,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientHOSPICE & PALLIATIVE CARE- — $20,000 · OtherHOSPICE & PALLIATIVE CARE-Mens Shelter of Charlotte Inc — $19,000 · OtherMens Shelter of Charlotte IncIndividual grant recipient — $14,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $14,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $13,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $12,000 · Other+13 more — $68,400 · Other+13 moreCare Ring Inc — $33,000 · HealthCare Ring IncCHARLOTTE RESCUE MISSION — $28,000 · HealthCHARLOTTE RESCUE MI…VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE — $20,000 · HealthVOLUNTEERS IN MEDIC…CHILDRENS SVC CTR OF WYOM VALLEY INC — $16,000 · HealthCHILDRENS SVC CTR O…THE MARLEY PROJECT IN — $40,000 · EducationTHE MARLE…KING'S COLLEGE — $8,000 · EducationKING'S CO…Charlotte Family Housing — $24,000 · Human ServicesROTARY CLUB OF TRYON FOUNDATION INC — $8,400 · Human ServicesSYNERGY IN ACTION INC — $4,400 · Human ServicesEVERHART MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY SCIENCE AND ART — $18,000 · Arts & CultureROOF ABOVE INC — $3,000 · Arts & CultureFoothills Humane Society Inc — $20,000 · AnimalsHELPING HANDS INC — $6,000 · International
Other$340,400Health$97,000Education$48,000Human Services$36,800Arts & Culture$21,000Animals$20,000International$6,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE MARLEY PROJECT IN — $40,000 over 9y, 37% of budgetSTEPS TO HOPE INC — $38,000 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetCare Ring Inc — $33,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetCHARLOTTE RESCUE MISSION — $28,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCharlotte Family Housing — $24,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetVOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE — $20,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetFoothills Humane Society Inc — $20,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetMens Shelter of Charlotte Inc — $19,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetEVERHART MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY SCIENCE AND ART — $18,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetCHILDRENS SVC CTR OF WYOM VALLEY INC — $16,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetROTARY CLUB OF TRYON FOUNDATION INC — $8,400 over 2y, 5.8% of budgetKING'S COLLEGE — $8,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetHELPING HANDS INC — $6,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetVeterans Healing Farm — $4,400 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetPolk County Community Foundation Inc — $4,400 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSYNERGY IN ACTION INC — $4,400 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSPARTANBURG SCIENCE CENTER — $4,400 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetROOF ABOVE INC — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE MARLEY PROJECT IN
  • Who funds STEPS TO HOPE INC
  • Who funds Care Ring Inc
  • Who funds CHARLOTTE RESCUE MISSION
  • Who funds Charlotte Family Housing
  • Who funds VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE
  • Who funds Foothills Humane Society Inc
  • Who funds Mens Shelter of Charlotte Inc
  • Who funds EVERHART MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY SCIENCE AND ART
  • Who funds CHILDRENS SVC CTR OF WYOM VALLEY INC
  • Who funds ROTARY CLUB OF TRYON FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds KING'S COLLEGE
  • Who funds HELPING HANDS INC
  • Who funds Veterans Healing Farm
  • Who funds Polk County Community Foundation Inc
  • Who funds SYNERGY IN ACTION INC
  • Who funds SPARTANBURG SCIENCE CENTER
  • Who funds ROOF ABOVE INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Duke Energy FoundationNC17.9× affinity8 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Duke Energy Foundation · The Cannon Foundation Inc · Foundation for the Carolinas · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Arnold Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph