Skip to content

· Private foundation

Armstrong Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$47k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$131kArts & Culture$84kFood & Nutrition$65kHealth$58kInternational$27kPublic Safety & Disaster$9kHuman Services$5kCommunity Improvement$4kOther$0
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $30k
$3,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$935k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LITTLE KESWICK SCHOOL$20,000
CENTER FOR HEALTH AND HOPE$10,000
WORLD KITCHEN$5,000
SOUTH PLAINS FOOD BANK$3,000
WOMEN'S PROTECTIVE SERVICES$3,000
LAHAINA RESTORATION FOUNDATION$2,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$2,000
JUNIOR LEAGUE OF LUBBOCK INC$1,000
LUBBOCK ARTS FESTIVAL$750
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–18, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $250 → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $500 → 14%CHILDREN'S HOME OF LUBBOCK: $500 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
CO
VA
MD
NM
DC
HI
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$340k · 14 repeat orgs$45k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +69% since the first grant, against +42% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
16

Total granted

$340k
$35k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+69%
+42%

Still filing today

57%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesArts & CultureHealthFood & NutritionInternationalCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CF
    Center for Health and Hope
    7× · 2017–2024 · $57k · revenue +69%
  • SP
    SOUTH PLAINS FOOD BANK INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $42k · revenue +46%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    4× · 2017–2022 · $20k · revenue +98%

Funded once

  • LE
    LUBBOCK ENTERTNMNT PERFORMING ARTS
    one grant, 2020 · $20k
  • CF
    CENTER FOR THE CHURCH GLOBAL AIDS
    one grant, 2019 · $7k
  • TT
    TEXAS TECH FOUNDATION FRIENDS OF MU
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Community Health Center of Lubbock Inc

Provide quality primary and preventataive health care services to those in need.

Health
2
Food Bank of West Central Texas

To procure and distribute nutritional food to qualified agencies that feed the hungry of West Central Texas.

Food & Nutrition
3
West Texas Food Bank

The WTFB exists to collect, purchase, and distribute food to feed the hungry in 19 counties in West Texas in partnership with volunteers and community organizations and to educate these partners and the public at large about the real face…

—
4
High Plains Food Bank

The High Plains Food Bank exists to help solve the issue of hunger and food insecurity in the Texas Panhandle.

—
5
Lubbock Rape Crisis Center

To provide victims of sexual assault in the lubbock county and surrounding area with free, confidential crisis advocacy, assistance, and support, and to promote public awareness of the realities of sexual victimization and strive toward…

Health
6
Colorado Legal Services

To provide meaningful access to high quality, civil legal services in the pursuit of justice for as many low income persons and members of vulnerable populations throughout colorado as possible.

Crime & Legal
7
Feeding Texas

To lead a unified effort for a hunger-free texas.

Community Improvement
8
Food & Water Watch

Food & water watch conducts extensive research and public education to ensure the food and water we consume is safe, accessible and sustainably produced. so we can all enjoy and trust in what we eat and drink, we help people take charge of…

Food & Nutrition
9
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
10
Womens Resource Center in Durango

Womens Resource Center (WRC) in Durango connects women and girls to the resources and programming that will help them reach their full potential in all states of their life.

—
11
Butte Emergency Food Bank

Provide food for individuals in need

—
12
Colorado Food Cluster Inc

Provide opportunities for all to thrive by offering free food resources to communities.

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is World Central Kitchen Inc; the most unlike its peers is Literacy Coalition of Colorado. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/17
Grantees still filing
13/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LITTLE KESWICK SCHOOL: $120,000 · OtherLITTLE KESWICK SCHOOLLUBBOCK ENTERTAINMENT PERFORMING AR: $60,000 · OtherLUBBOCK ENTERTAINMENT PERFORMING ARLUBBOCK ENTERTNMNT PERFORMING ARTS: $20,000 · OtherLUBBOCK ENTERTNMNT PERFORMING ARTSTHE FOOD DEPOT NM'S FOOD BANK: $9,000 · OtherLUBBOCK COOPER PROJECT GRADUATION: $8,000 · Other+14 more: $16,250 · Other+14 moreCenter for Health and Hope: $57,000 · HealthCenter for Health…+1 more: $1,000 · HealthSOUTH PLAINS FOOD BANK INC: $42,143 · Food & NutritionSOUTH PLAINS FOO…FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES: $13,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD BANK OF THE…MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $19,500 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $5,000 · InternationalWOMEN'S PROTECTIVE SERVICES: $3,500 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $1,500 · Human ServicesCHILDREN'S HOME OF LUBBOCK AND FAMILY SERVICE AGENCY INC: $500 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $250 · Human ServicesJUNIOR LEAGUE OF LUBBOCK INC: $4,000 · Community ImprovementTHE LAHAINA RESTORATION FOUNDATION: $2,000 · Arts & CultureLUBBOCK ARTS ALLIANCE INC: $500 · Arts & CultureRed River Community House Inc: $500 · Arts & CultureWOMEN'S BEAN PROJECT: $1,000 · Employment
Other$233,250Health$58,000Food & Nutrition$55,143International$24,500Human Services$5,750Community Improvement$4,000Arts & Culture$3,000Employment$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCenter for Health and Hope: $57,000 over 7y, 3.5% of budgetSOUTH PLAINS FOOD BANK INC: $42,143 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $19,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES: $13,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJUNIOR LEAGUE OF LUBBOCK INC: $4,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetWOMEN'S PROTECTIVE SERVICES: $3,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE LAHAINA RESTORATION FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTeethsavers International Inc: $1,000 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetWOMEN'S BEAN PROJECT: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLUBBOCK ARTS ALLIANCE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOME OF LUBBOCK AND FAMILY SERVICE AGENCY INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Center for Health and Hope ↗
  • Who funds SOUTH PLAINS FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds JUNIOR LEAGUE OF LUBBOCK INC ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN'S PROTECTIVE SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds THE LAHAINA RESTORATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds Teethsavers International Inc ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN'S BEAN PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds LUBBOCK ARTS ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds Red River Community House Inc ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HOME OF LUBBOCK AND FAMILY SERVICE AGENCY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ST FRANCIS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds LITERACY COALITION OF COLORADO ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Diekemper Family Foundation IncTX15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Diekemper Family Foundation Inc · Ch Foundation Inc · Kuykendall Foundation · Rushing Family Foundation · South Plains Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Armstrong Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Armstrong Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Armstrong Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Armstrong Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Armstrong Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph