Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

South Plains Foundation

Its FY2020 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$260k
Granted FY2020
22
Grants FY2020
1
States reached
$58k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172020.

Health$350kHuman Services$308kEducation$120kFood & Nutrition$63kYouth Development$53kPhilanthropy$51kArts & Culture$47kReligion$30kOther$0
02FY2020 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2020

  • Under $10k7 grants · $41k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $161k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $58k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY$58,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE$21,000
HIGH POINT VILLAGE$15,000
Individual grant recipient$15,000
CASA$10,000
THE SALVATION ARMY$10,000
KINGDOM COME MINISTRIES$10,000
LUBBOCK CHILDREN'S HEALTH CLINIC$10,000
CHILDREN'S HOME OF LUBBOCK$10,000
SOUTH PLAINS FOOD BANK$10,000
COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER OF LUBBOCK$10,000
OPEN DOOR$10,000
CHILDREN'S HOME OF LUBBOCK$10,000
MEALS ON WHEELS$10,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF LUBBOCK$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–20, $124k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%HIGH POINT VILLAGE: $15k → 17%HIGH POINT VILLAGE: $10k → 17%BUCKNER CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES: $10k → 17%BUCKNER CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES: $10k → 17%CARILLON: $5k → 17%REFUGE SERVICES: $3k → 17%LUBBOCK DREAM CENTER: $11k → 17%MEALS ON WHEELS: $10k → 17%LUBBOCK DREAM CENTER: $10k → 17%LUBBOCK DREAM CENTER: $5k → 17%MEALS ON WHEELS: $5k → 17%LUBBOCK IMPACT: $10k → 17%LUBBOCK IMPACT: $5k → 17%BREEDLOVE FOODS: $10k → 17%THE INSIDE OUT FOUNDATION: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$799k · 26 repeat orgs$253k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +43% since the first grant, against +17% for the ones you funded once.

26 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2020, 12 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
26

Total granted

$799k
$203k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+17%

Still filing today

54%
46%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20
Human ServicesHealthEducationYouth DevelopmentAnimalsArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WP
    WOMEN'S PROTECTIVE SERVICES
    3× · 2017–2019 · $30k · revenue +54%
  • SP
    SOUTH PLAINS FOOD BANK INC
    2× · 2018–2020 · $28k · revenue +43%
  • LD
    LUBBOCK DREAM CENTER
    3× · 2017–2020 · $26k · revenue +146%

Funded once

  • LC
    LUBBOCK CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2019 · $20k · revenue +13%
  • LC
    LUBBOCK CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY NURSIN
    one grant, 2017 · $19k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lubbock Family Outreach Center Inc Dba Family Guidance & Outreach Center

The Family Guidance & Outreach Center of Lubbock is dedicated to the prevention of child abuse and neglect and supporting, mentoring, and educating parents.

Human Services
2
Lubbock Area United Way Inc

Giving people hope. working to address the root issues of the significant challenges facing our south plains communities to create lasting, positive change.

Philanthropy
3
Lubbock Rape Crisis Center

To provide victims of sexual assault in the lubbock county and surrounding area with free, confidential crisis advocacy, assistance, and support, and to promote public awareness of the realities of sexual victimization and strive toward…

Health
4
Volunteer Center of Lubbock Inc

The volunteer center of lubbock inspires a more engaged community by helping people find their purpose and act on it.

Community Improvement
5
Lubbock Christian School

Lubbock christian school is dedicated to providing a quality environment in which each student will grow in wisdom and stature and in favor with god and man. lcs strives for excellence spiritually, personally, and professionally among…

Education
6
Goodwill Industries of Lubbock Inc

Goodwill is a local nonprofit helping people overcome challenges, build skills, find jobs and grow careers.

Employment
7
Young Women's Christian Association of Lubbock

The young women's christian association of lubbock is dedicated to eliminating racism, empowering women and promoting peace, justice, freedom, and dignity for all.

8
Lubbock Chamber of Commerce Foundation
9
Family Legal Services of the South Plains

The family legal services of the south plains works to provide low income clients of the south plains with first-rate legal assistance, advocacy, and quality counsel in matters of family and elder law at free and/or reduced cost.

Crime & Legal
10
Goodwill Industries of Lubbock Contract Services Inc

Goodwill is a local nonprofit helping people overcome challenges, build skills, find jobs and grow careers.

Employment
11
Early Learning Centers of Lubbock Inc

Educating and nurturing young children and their families for successful futures.

Human Services
12
Ballet Lubbock

The mission of ballet lubbock is to change lives. as a pre-professional dance school, we enhance our community through premier dance training, performances, and outreach.

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Health Center of Lubbock Inc and the most unlike its peers is Meals On Wheels. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 41 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number23%0%<5yr15%0%5–10yr16%29%10–20yr16%14%20–35yr12%38%35–55yr18%19%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value23%0%<5yr15%0%5–10yr16%27%10–20yr16%13%20–35yr12%43%35–55yr18%17%55yr+

The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/29
the rest of the field
13%
142/1,116

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 59 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/29
Grantees still filing
23/29
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY — $268,000 · OtherTEXAS TECH UNIVERSITYEARLY LEARNING CENTER — $35,000 · OtherOPEN DOOR — $31,000 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE — $31,000 · OtherCASA — $28,230 · OtherRanching Heritage Association — $25,000 · OtherLUBBOCK CHILDRENS HEALTH CLINIC — $25,000 · Other+31 more — $301,724 · Other+31 moreWOMEN'S PROTECTIVE SERVICES — $30,000 · Human ServicesWOMEN'S PROTECTIVE…LUBBOCK DREAM CENTER — $26,000 · Human ServicesLUBBOCK DREAM CENT…CHILDREN'S HOME OF LUBBOCK AND FAMILY SERVICE AGENCY INC — $25,000 · Human ServicesCHILDREN'S HOME OF…HIGH POINT VILLAGE INC — $25,000 · Human ServicesHIGH POINT VILLAGE…BUCKNER CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES INC — $20,000 · Human ServicesBUCKNER CHILDREN &…MEALS ON WHEELS — $15,000 · Human ServicesMEALS ON WHEELSLUBBOCK IMPACT INC — $15,000 · Human ServicesLUBBOCK IMPACT INCBREEDLOVE FOODS INC — $10,000 · Human ServicesBREEDLOVE FOODS IN…+4 more — $17,500 · Human Services+4 moreCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WEST TEXAS — $50,000 · Philanthropy+1 more — $600 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER OF LUBBOCK INC — $20,000 · HealthALAMO AREA RAPE CRISIS CENTER — $10,000 · HealthAlstrom Angels — $10,000 · HealthLUBBOCK CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY — $20,000 · EducationWAYLAND BAPTIST UNIVERSITY — $10,000 · EducationSOUTH PLAINS FOOD BANK INC — $28,121 · Food & NutritionKINGDOM COME MINISTRIES INC — $25,000 · Religion
Other$744,954Human Services$183,500Philanthropy$50,600Health$40,000Education$30,000Food & Nutrition$28,121Religion$25,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WEST TEXAS — $50,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetWOMEN'S PROTECTIVE SERVICES — $30,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetSOUTH PLAINS FOOD BANK INC — $28,121 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLUBBOCK DREAM CENTER — $26,000 over 3y, 2.7% of budgetRanching Heritage Association — $25,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOME OF LUBBOCK AND FAMILY SERVICE AGENCY INC — $25,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetKINGDOM COME MINISTRIES INC — $25,000 over 3y, 3.8% of budgetHIGH POINT VILLAGE INC — $25,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetLUBBOCK CHILDRENS HEALTH CLINIC — $25,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER OF LUBBOCK INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBUCKNER CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLUBBOCK CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS — $15,000 over 2y, 7.8% of budgetLUBBOCK IMPACT INC — $15,000 over 2y, 6.8% of budgetLUBBOCK CHAMBER OF COMMERCE — $15,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetALAMO AREA RAPE CRISIS CENTER — $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetWAYLAND BAPTIST UNIVERSITY — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLUBBOCK BOYS' & GIRLS' CLUB INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetBREEDLOVE FOODS INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAlstrom Angels — $10,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetWho We Play For — $7,160 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetINSIDE OUT FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetTEXAS GIRLS AND BOYS RANCH — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCARILLON INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLUBBOCK ARTS ALLIANCE INC — $3,700 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetPHILANTHROPY SOUTHWEST — $600 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WEST TEXAS
  • Who funds WOMEN'S PROTECTIVE SERVICES
  • Who funds SOUTH PLAINS FOOD BANK INC
  • Who funds LUBBOCK DREAM CENTER
  • Who funds Ranching Heritage Association
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HOME OF LUBBOCK AND FAMILY SERVICE AGENCY INC
  • Who funds KINGDOM COME MINISTRIES INC
  • Who funds HIGH POINT VILLAGE INC
  • Who funds LUBBOCK CHILDRENS HEALTH CLINIC
  • Who funds COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER OF LUBBOCK INC
  • Who funds BUCKNER CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES INC
  • Who funds LUBBOCK CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS
  • Who funds LUBBOCK IMPACT INC
  • Who funds LUBBOCK CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
  • Who funds ALAMO AREA RAPE CRISIS CENTER
  • Who funds WAYLAND BAPTIST UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds LUBBOCK BOYS' & GIRLS' CLUB INC
  • Who funds BREEDLOVE FOODS INC
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC
  • Who funds Alstrom Angels

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Ch Foundation IncTX43.2× affinity18 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Ch Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of West Texas · Diekemper Family Foundation Inc · HDS Foundation · Helen Jones Foundation Inc · Kuykendall Foundation · Garrison Family Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation · Mary L Livermore Foundation · Caprock Foundation Inc · C and a McDonald Family Foundation · International Assoc of Lions Clubs

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization South Plains Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to South Plains Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to South Plains Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 59 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph