How much did DIEKEMPER FAMILY FOUNDATION INC grant in FY2022?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 58% of DIEKEMPER FAMILY FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

arts festivalliteracy lubbockboysriding

2019

boyschildren's lubbock

2020

salvation armyboys

2021

gracemethodist churchboys girlschildren's lubbock

2022

tech

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2022 · 42 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2022

Under $10k6 grants · $12k
$10k–50k25 grants · $381k
$50k–250k8 grants · $903k
$250k+3 grants · $750k

$10,500

Median grant

States reached

Total assets

Largest grants

COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER$250,000
LUBBOCK PROFORMING ARTS$250,000
SCIENCE SPECTRUM$250,000
TEXAS TECH FOUNDATION$201,500
ALL SAINTS EPISCOPAL SCHOOL$151,000
SOUTH PLAINS FOOD BANK$150,000
TEXAS TECH THERAPEUTIC RIDING$100,000
COVENANT CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$100,000
UMC FOUNDATION$100,000
LUBBOCK SYMPHONY$50,000
CHILDREN'S HOME OF LUBBOCK$50,000
LINK MINISTRIES$25,000
RANCHING HERITAGE ASSOCIATION$25,000
LUBBOCK ARTS ALLIANCE$25,000
LUBBOCK MEALS ON WHEELS$25,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–22, $105k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17% — the area typically sits at 16%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

61%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$1.5M · 62 repeat orgs$967k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +49% since the first grant, against -4% for the ones you funded once.

62 repeat relationships — 24 still active in FY2022, 38 since wound down; 18 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$1.5M

$61k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%

-4%

Still filing today

40%

23%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 56% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $906k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesArts & CultureFood & NutritionHealthCommunity ImprovementHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

TT
TEXAS TECH FOUNDATION
3× · 2017–2022 · $209k · revenue +27%
SP
SOUTH PLAINS FOOD BANK
6× · 2017–2022 · $181k · revenue +48%
UF
UMC FOUNDATION
2× · 2017–2022 · $106k · revenue +113%

Funded once

BC
BURKHART CENTER FOR AUTISM
one grant, 2018 · $5k
TT
TEXAS TECH ATHLETICS
one grant, 2020 · $4k
UM
UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER LUBBOCK
one grant, 2020 · $4k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Lubbock Christian University

Lubbock christian university is a christ-centered, academic community of learners, transforming the hearts, minds, and hands of students for lives of purpose and service.

Education

Lubbock Chamber of Commerce Foundation

—

Lubbock Experience Inc

To support and grow the lubbock community and west texas area.

Arts & Culture

Lubbock Chamber of Commerce

The lubbock chamber of commerce provides promotion of business and community growth and development as well as preserving the competitive business enterprise system in the lubbock and surrounding area.

—

Children's Home of Lubbock and Family

Working in creative collaboration to provide quality care that transforms the lives of at-risk children and their families through the active compassion of christ.

Human Services

Lubbock Family Outreach Center Inc

The Family Guidance & Outreach Center of Lubbock is dedicated to the prevention of child abuse and neglect and supporting, mentoring, and educating parents.

Human Services

Lubbock Christian Schools

Lubbock christian school is dedicated to providing a quality environment in which each student will grow in wisdom and stature and in favor with god and man.

Education

Community Health Center of Lubbock Inc

Provide quality primary and preventative health care services to those in need.

Health

Goodwill Industries of Lubbock Inc

Helping people overcome challenges, build skills, find jobs and grow careers.

Employment

Lubbock Lutheran Retirement

To provide help, healing and hope in the name of jesus christ.

—

Lubbock County Expo Center Inc

Planning, designing, funding, constructing and ultimately management of a new facility to be known as the lubbock county expo center.

Education

Lubbock Economic Development Alliance

To promote economic growth by creating high quality jobs, investing in new capital improvements, retaining and expanding existing businesses and enhancing lubbock's quality of life.

Community Improvement

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Volunteer Center of Lubbock Inc and the most unlike its peers is Ronald Mcdonald House. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

2%1/48

the rest of the field

11%

120/1,097

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

42 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

39/42

Grantees still filing

28/42

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$1,470,846Arts & Culture$299,200Food & Nutrition$214,200Education$213,200Human Services$109,850Health$108,500Housing & Shelter$41,900

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of West TexasTX70.8× affinity31 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of West Texas · Ch Foundation Inc · HDS Foundation · Helen Jones Foundation Inc · Kuykendall Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation · Welborn-Payne Endowment Trust · Ershel Franklin Charitable Trust · Garrison Family Foundation · South Plains Foundation · Lubbock South Plains Lions Club · Rc Johnson Jr Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation DIEKEMPER FAMILY FOUNDATION INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: LINK MINISTRIES.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~12 months of operating runway; revenue contracted over 9 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

9 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 752784158 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on LINK MINISTRIES, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 12 months of cash on hand.
WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue contracted over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 68% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Diekemper Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Diekemper Family Foundation Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

DIEKEMPER FAMILY FOUNDATION INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

42 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Diekemper Family Foundation Inc?

More from the funding graph

DIEKEMPER FAMILY FOUNDATION INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

42 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Diekemper Family Foundation Inc?

More from the funding graph