Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Kuykendall Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$160k
Granted FY2025still arriving
38
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$14k
Largest
01What you fund
0194% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Human Services$171kReligion$155kHealth$126kFood & Nutrition$97kHousing & Shelter$67kPhilanthropy$57kArts & Culture$35kRecreation & Sports$23kOther$0
02FY2025 · 38 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k36 grants · $136k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $24k
$4,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FIRST CHRISTIAN CHURCH$13,500
REFUGE SERVICES INC$10,500
HOSPICE OF THE SOUTH PLAINS$7,000
LUBBOCK MEALS ON WHEELS INC$7,000
FAMILY PROMISE OF LUBBOCK INC$6,500
SOUTH PLAINS FOOD BANK$6,000
LUBBOCK AREA UNITED WAY$6,000
Individual grant recipient$6,000
TEXAS BOYS RANCH$5,500
ARRINGTON CANCER CENTER$5,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES$5,000
CASA OF THE SOUTH PLAINS INC$4,500
YWCA OF LUBBOCK$4,000
MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION$4,000
HIGH POINT VILLAGE$4,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $115k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 16%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 16%HIGH POINT VILLAGE: $4k → 17%HIGH POINT VILLAGE: $3k → 17%HIGH POINT VILLAGE: $2k → 17%HIGH POINT VILLAGE: $2k → 17%REFUGE SERVICES INC: $17k → 17%REFUGE SERVICES INC: $11k → 17%REFUGE SERVICES INC: $10k → 17%REFUGE SERVICES INC: $9k → 17%REFUGE SERVICES INC: $9k → 17%REFUGE SERVICES INC: $1k → 17%HOSPICE OF LUBBOCK: $7k → 17%HOSPICE OF LUBBOCK: $7k → 17%HOSPICE OF LUBBOCK: $7k → 17%HOSPICE OF LUBBOCK: $7k → 17%HOSPICE OF LUBBOCK: $7k → 17%LUBBOCK IMPACT: $2k → 17%LUBBOCK IMPACT: $2k → 17%CHILDRENS HOME OF LUBBOCK: $4k → 17%CHILDRENS HOME OF LUBBOCK: $3k → 17%CHILDRENS HOME OF LUBBOCK: $1k → 17%CHILDRENS HOME OF LUBBOCK: $1k → 17%CHILDREN'S HOME OF LUBBOCK: $1k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$815k · 40 repeat orgs$17k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +25% since the first grant, against -1% for the ones you funded once.

40 repeat relationships — 36 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

40
4

Total granted

$815k
$11k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
-1%

Still filing today

48%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesFood & NutritionPhilanthropyHealthArts & CultureHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SP
    SOUTH PLAINS FOOD BANK INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $36k · revenue +31%
  • FP
    FAMILY PROMISE OF LUBBOCK INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $35k · revenue +5%
  • HO
    HOSPICE OF LUBBOCK INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $35k · revenue +30%

Funded once

  • TS
    THE SALVATION ARMY
    one grant, 2020 · $8k
  • CL
    CREATIVE LEARNING CENTER PRE-SCHOOL
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
  • JL
    JUNIOR LEAGUE OF LUBBOCK INC
    one grant, 2020 · $500 · revenue -1%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lubbock Family Outreach Center Inc Dba Family Guidance & Outreach Center

The Family Guidance & Outreach Center of Lubbock is dedicated to the prevention of child abuse and neglect and supporting, mentoring, and educating parents.

Human Services
2
Ywca of Lubbock Legacy Fund Inc

The ywca of lubbock legacy fund inc. is dedicated to meeting the needs of the ywca of lubbock in supporting the community through its mission of eliminating racism, empowering women, and promoting peace, justice, freedom, and dignity for…

Philanthropy
3
Family Legal Services of the South Plains

The family legal services of the south plains works to provide low income clients of the south plains with first-rate legal assistance, advocacy, and quality counsel in matters of family and elder law at free and/or reduced cost.

Crime & Legal
4
Goodwill Industries of Lubbock Contract Services Inc

Goodwill is a local nonprofit helping people overcome challenges, build skills, find jobs and grow careers.

Employment
5
Lone Star Casa Inc

Lone Star CASA elevates the voices of children in Kaufman and Rockwall County who have experienced abuse and neglect by providing trained volunteer advocates to work alongside children and families so they can achieve safety and stability…

Civil Rights
6
Lubbock Rape Crisis Center

To provide victims of sexual assault in the lubbock county and surrounding area with free, confidential crisis advocacy, assistance, and support, and to promote public awareness of the realities of sexual victimization and strive toward…

Health
7
Lubbock Chamber of Commerce

The lubbock chamber of commerce provides promotion of business and community growth and development as well as preserving the competitive business enterprise system in the lubbock and surrounding area.

8
Goodwill Industries of Lubbock Inc

Goodwill is a local nonprofit helping people overcome challenges, build skills, find jobs and grow careers.

Employment
9
Lubbock Christian School

Lubbock christian school is dedicated to providing a quality environment in which each student will grow in wisdom and stature and in favor with god and man. lcs strives for excellence spiritually, personally, and professionally among…

Education
10
Lubbock Association of Realtors Inc

Trade Organization of Real Estate Professionals. Promoting the common interest of the Real Estate industry in Lubbock and the surrounding area. To help promote improvement of business conditions in this area.

11
Big Brothers Big Sisters of Lubbock Inc

To create and support one-to-one mentoring relationships that ignite the power and promise of youth.

12
Womens Sober House of Lufkin Inc

The Mantooth House is a Recovery Residence for Chemically Dependent adult women who have successfully completed primary treatment and are in early, but active recovery. We exist to provide quality recovery housing and bridge the gap…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lubbock Area United Way Inc and the most unlike its peers is Ronald McDONALD House Charities of Greater North Texas Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/21
Grantees still filing
14/21
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FIRST CHRISTIAN CHURCH — $81,000 · OtherFIRST CHRISTIAN CHURCHIndividual grant recipient — $36,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientARRINGTON CANCER CENTER — $30,000 · OtherARRINGTON CANCER CENTERYOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF LUBBOCK — $24,000 · OtherBREEDLOVE DEHYDRATION FOODS — $24,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF LUBBOCK INC — $20,000 · OtherMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION — $19,000 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSS — $18,000 · OtherOPEN DOOR — $17,000 · OtherTHE DREAM CENTER — $17,000 · OtherSPECIAL OLYMPICS OF TEXAS INC — $23,000 · OtherCASA OF THE SOUTH PLAINS INC — $21,500 · Other+18 more — $123,000 · Other+18 moreREFUGE SERVICES INC — $55,000 · Human ServicesREFUGE SERVICES INCHOSPICE OF LUBBOCK INC — $34,500 · Human ServicesHOSPICE OF LUBBOCK IN…TEXAS GIRLS AND BOYS RANCH — $28,000 · Human ServicesTEXAS GIRLS AND BOYS …WOMEN'S PROTECTIVE SERVICES — $18,000 · Human ServicesWOMEN'S PROTECTIVE SE…HIGH POINT VILLAGE INC — $11,000 · Human ServicesHIGH POINT VILLAGE IN…CHILDREN'S HOME OF LUBBOCK AND FAMILY SERVICE AGENCY INC — $10,000 · Human ServicesCHILDREN'S HOME OF LU…+1 more — $4,000 · Human ServicesLUBBOCK MEALS ON WHEELS INC — $37,000 · Food & NutritionLUBBOCK M…SOUTH PLAINS FOOD BANK INC — $36,000 · Food & NutritionSOUTH PLA…LUBBOCK AREA UNITED WAY INC — $31,000 · PhilanthropyRONALD McDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF GREATER NORTH TEXAS INC — $26,000 · PhilanthropyFAMILY PROMISE OF LUBBOCK INC — $35,000 · Housing & ShelterCOMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER OF LUBBOCK INC — $16,500 · HealthALAMO AREA RAPE CRISIS CENTER — $12,000 · HealthLUBBOCK SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC — $12,000 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM OF TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY ASSOCIATION — $12,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$453,500Human Services$160,500Food & Nutrition$73,000Philanthropy$57,000Housing & Shelter$35,000Health$28,500Arts & Culture$24,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetREFUGE SERVICES INC — $55,000 over 6y, 3.0% of budgetLUBBOCK MEALS ON WHEELS INC — $37,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetSOUTH PLAINS FOOD BANK INC — $36,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF LUBBOCK INC — $35,000 over 6y, 2.4% of budgetHOSPICE OF LUBBOCK INC — $34,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetLUBBOCK AREA UNITED WAY INC — $31,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTEXAS GIRLS AND BOYS RANCH — $28,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetRONALD McDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF GREATER NORTH TEXAS INC — $26,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetYOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF LUBBOCK — $24,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS OF TEXAS INC — $23,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCASA OF THE SOUTH PLAINS INC — $21,500 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetWOMEN'S PROTECTIVE SERVICES — $18,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER OF LUBBOCK INC — $16,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetLUBBOCK SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC — $12,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetALAMO AREA RAPE CRISIS CENTER — $12,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetMUSEUM OF TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY ASSOCIATION — $12,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetHIGH POINT VILLAGE INC — $11,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOME OF LUBBOCK AND FAMILY SERVICE AGENCY INC — $10,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetLUBBOCK IMPACT INC — $4,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetJUNIOR LEAGUE OF LUBBOCK INC — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds REFUGE SERVICES INC
  • Who funds LUBBOCK MEALS ON WHEELS INC
  • Who funds SOUTH PLAINS FOOD BANK INC
  • Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF LUBBOCK INC
  • Who funds HOSPICE OF LUBBOCK INC
  • Who funds LUBBOCK AREA UNITED WAY INC
  • Who funds TEXAS GIRLS AND BOYS RANCH
  • Who funds RONALD McDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF GREATER NORTH TEXAS INC
  • Who funds YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF LUBBOCK
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS OF TEXAS INC
  • Who funds CASA OF THE SOUTH PLAINS INC
  • Who funds WOMEN'S PROTECTIVE SERVICES
  • Who funds COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER OF LUBBOCK INC
  • Who funds LUBBOCK SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC
  • Who funds ALAMO AREA RAPE CRISIS CENTER
  • Who funds MUSEUM OF TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds Alcoholic Recovery Center Inc
  • Who funds HIGH POINT VILLAGE INC
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HOME OF LUBBOCK AND FAMILY SERVICE AGENCY INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Diekemper Family Foundation IncTX34.8× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Diekemper Family Foundation Inc · Ch Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of West Texas · Texas Instruments Foundation · South Plains Foundation · The Evelyn M Davies Foundation Trust · Helen Jones Foundation Inc · HDS Foundation · Mary L Livermore Foundation · Rc Johnson Jr Foundation Inc · Ershel Franklin Charitable Trust · International Assoc of Lions Clubs

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Kuykendall Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph