Skip to content

Texas · Private foundation

Kuykendall Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$160k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
38
Grants FY2025
39
Organizations funded FY2024
8%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$4,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$13,500
Organizations funded a year
33 to 39
FY2020 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
1
Total assets, FY2025
$2.3M
Applications
Takes unsolicited applications
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 8% of the organizations Kuykendall Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 4% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving38$160k5%
FY202439$148k8%
FY202336$140k8%
FY202234$132k3%
FY202133$130k3%
FY202036$124kn/a
94% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Human Services$171kReligion$155kHealth$126kFood & Nutrition$97kHousing & Shelter$67kPhilanthropy$57kArts & Culture$35kRecreation & Sports$23kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2020 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 23 grantees

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 23 recipients with no EIN on record ($275k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Kuykendall Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRefuge Services Inc: $55,000 over 6y, 3.0% of budgetLubbock Meals on Wheels Inc: $37,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetSouth Plains Food Bank Inc: $36,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetFamily Promise of Lubbock Inc: $35,000 over 6y, 2.4% of budgetHospice of Lubbock Inc: $34,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetLubbock Area United Way Inc: $31,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTexas Girls and Boys Ranch: $28,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetRONALD McDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF GREATER NORTH TEXAS INC: $26,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetYoung Women's Christian Association of Lubbock: $24,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSpecial Olympics of Texas Inc: $23,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCasa of the South Plains Inc: $21,500 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetWomen's Protective Services: $18,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCommunity Health Center of Lubbock Inc: $16,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetLubbock Symphony Orchestra Inc: $12,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetMuseum of Texas Tech University Association: $12,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetAlamo Area Rape Crisis Center: $12,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetHigh Point Village Inc: $11,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetChildren's Home of Lubbock and Family Service Agency Inc: $10,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetLubbock Impact Inc: $4,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetJunior League of Lubbock Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 20.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Diekemper Family Foundation IncTX34.8× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Diekemper Family Foundation Inc · Ch Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of West Texas · Texas Instruments Foundation · South Plains Foundation · The Evelyn M Davies Foundation Trust · Helen Jones Foundation Inc · HDS Foundation · Mary L Livermore Foundation · Rc Johnson Jr Foundation Inc · Ershel Franklin Charitable Trust · International Assoc of Lions Clubs

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Kuykendall Foundation with peer funders

About Kuykendall Foundation

How much does Kuykendall Foundation give?
Kuykendall Foundation reported 38 grants totaling $159,500 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 33 and 39 organizations a year over FY2020 to FY2024.
What does Kuykendall Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2020 to FY2025, its largest causes are Human Services (21%), Religion (19%), Health (15%).
Who are Kuykendall Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2020 to FY2025: First Christian Church ($81k), Refuge Services Inc ($55k), Lubbock Meals on Wheels Inc ($37k).
Does Kuykendall Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 8% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Kuykendall Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it accepts unsolicited grant applications.
Which funders back the same organizations as Kuykendall Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Diekemper Family Foundation Inc, Ch Foundation Inc, Community Foundation of West Texas.
Where is Kuykendall Foundation based?
Kuykendall Foundation is based in TX.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Kuykendall’s filings →

More from the funding graph