Skip to content

· Private foundation

Armando & Joan Ortiz Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3.5M
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$2.5M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Education$2.6MPhilanthropy$767kPublic Safety & Disaster$164kReligion$67kYouth Development$45kArts & Culture$32kCivil Rights$31kInternational$30kOther$0
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $40k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $164k
  • $250k+2 grants · $3.3M
$100,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MCGILL UNIVERSITY$2,487,565
SCHWAB CHARITABLE$766,775
MCGILL UNIVERSITY$100,000
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN$64,000
SOCIETY OF THE SACRED HEART UNITED STATES-CANADA PROVINCE INC$39,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 33% of grant dollars ($1.2M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 67% that went abroad ($2.6M) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–22, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 21%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND: $75 → 19%FOCUS HOPE: $30k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
IA
IN
NJ
CA
CO
MO
WV
VA
MD
AZ
TN
DC
OK
GA

Beyond the US: 67% of all-years giving ($2.6M)

1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Canada$2.6M · 2 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 66% of Armando & Joan Ortiz Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Armando & Joan Ortiz Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 67% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

8%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$236k · 26 repeat orgs$2.8M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +15% since the first grant, against +13% for those funded once.

26 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 25 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
32

Total granted

$236k
$204k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+15%
+13%

Still filing today

50%
53%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 2% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.6M went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationHealthArts & CultureInternationalYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CRANBROOK EDUCATIONAL COMMUNITY
    3× · 2020–2022 · $25k · revenue +15%
  • GI
    GIRLS INCORPORATED OF METRO DENVER
    2× · 2022–2023 · $15k · revenue +18%
  • HI
    HAVEN INC
    3× · 2018–2020 · $650 · revenue +29%

Funded once

  • F
    FOCUSHOPE
    one grant, 2022 · $30k · revenue +17%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $20k
  • GC
    GESU CATHOLIC SCHOOL
    one grant, 2021 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
2
Disabilityin

The organization is the leading nonprofit resource for business disability inclusion worldwide. together with the world's leading brands, disability:in drives progress on disability inclusion through initiatives, tools, and expertise that…

Community Improvement
3
Aacsb International - the Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business

Aacsb international provides quality assurance of business school programs, the latest in business education intelligence, thought leadership, and learning and development services.

Education
4
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
5
Association of American Medical Colleges

Aamc leads & serves the academic medicine community to improve the health of people everywhere.

Education
6
Women Action & the Media Corp

Gender equity in media access, representation, employment and ownership and a world in which a just media is considered essential to a just society. women, action & the media (wam) connects and supports media makers, activists, academics…

—
7
National Science and Technology Medals Foundation Inc

The nstmf's mission is to build inclusive stem communities across the united states. fundamental to these communities are the significant, inspirational connections we foster between the individuals who have received national recognition…

—
8
American National Standards Institute

To enhance both the global competitiveness of u.s. business and the u.s. quality of life by promoting and facilitating voluntary consensus standards and conformity assessment systems, and safeguarding their integrity.

Public Benefit
9
American College of Radiology

The american college of radiology (acr) is organized to advance radiology science, practice and access, improve quality and safety, provide continuing education for radiology and allied professionals, and achieve better outcomes through…

Health
10
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement
11
Association for Computing Machinery Inc

We are an intl. scientific & educational org. dedicated to advancing art, science & technology.

Science & Tech
12
Lowell Observatory

The mission of lowell observatory is to pursue the study of astronomy, especially the study of our solar system and its evolution; to conduct pure research in astronomical phenomena; and to maintain quality public education and outreach…

Science & Tech
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is March of Dimes Inc; the most unlike its peers is National Geographic Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 61 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/31
Grantees still filing
21/31
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MCGILL UNIVERSITY: $2,587,565 · OtherMCGILL UNIVERSITY+43 more: $184,190 · Other+43 moreDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC: $766,775 · PhilanthropyDONOR ADVISED CHARITAB…+1 more: $400 · PhilanthropyWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $164,000 · International+1 more: $5,000 · InternationalCRANBROOK EDUCATIONAL COMMUNITY: $25,250 · EducationFIRST BOOK: $20,000 · Education+2 more: $173 · EducationFOCUSHOPE: $30,000 · Human ServicesGIRLS WHO CODE INC: $10,000 · Human Services+3 more: $575 · Human ServicesGIRLS INCORPORATED OF METRO DENVER: $15,000 · Youth DevelopmentGIRL SCOUTS OF NORTHERN INDIANA MICHIANA INC: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentCOLORADO WOMEN'S EMPLOYMENT & EDUCATION INC: $10,000 · EmploymentWOMEN'S BEAN PROJECT: $5,000 · Employment
Other$2,771,755Philanthropy$767,175International$169,000Education$45,423Human Services$40,575Youth Development$25,000Employment$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC: $766,775 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $164,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFOCUSHOPE: $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCRANBROOK EDUCATIONAL COMMUNITY: $25,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFIRST BOOK: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGIRLS INCORPORATED OF METRO DENVER: $15,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetGIRLS WHO CODE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF NORTHERN INDIANA MICHIANA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBLUE JACKET INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFORT WAYNE PUBLIC TELEVISION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCOLORADO WOMEN'S EMPLOYMENT & EDUCATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAtlanta Humane Society & Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPETSMART CHARITIES INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOMEN'S BEAN PROJECT: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ARTS: $1,070 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHAVEN INC: $650 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $650 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEASTER SEALS INC: $400 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN MACULAR DEGENERATION GOEHRING: $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATIONAL FEDERATION OF THE BLIND: $350 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $325 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAARP FOUNDATION: $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCONSUMER REPORTS INC: $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION: $205 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC SOCIETY: $150 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Medical Association Foundation: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND INC: $75 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds FOCUSHOPE ↗
  • Who funds CRANBROOK EDUCATIONAL COMMUNITY ↗
  • Who funds FIRST BOOK ↗
  • Who funds GIRLS INCORPORATED OF METRO DENVER ↗
  • Who funds GIRLS WHO CODE INC ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF NORTHERN INDIANA MICHIANA INC ↗
  • Who funds BLUE JACKET INC ↗
  • Who funds FORT WAYNE PUBLIC TELEVISION INC ↗
  • Who funds COLORADO WOMEN'S EMPLOYMENT & EDUCATION INC ↗
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
  • Who funds Atlanta Humane Society & Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Inc ↗
  • Who funds PETSMART CHARITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN'S BEAN PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds THE DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ARTS ↗
  • Who funds HAVEN INC ↗
  • Who funds MARCH OF DIMES INC ↗
  • Who funds EASTER SEALS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Blackbaud Giving FundSC9.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Armando & Joan Ortiz Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Armando & Joan Ortiz Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • The National Federation of the Blind: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 61 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Armando & Joan Ortiz’s filings →

More from the funding graph