· Private foundation
Applestone Foundation-Ima
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k9 grants · $48k
- $10k–50k20 grants · $303k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FAIRVILLE FRIENDS SCHOOL | $25,000 |
| BLOOMSBURG UNIVERSUITY | $22,650 |
| UNIONVILLE HIGH SCHOOL | $21,000 |
| KENNETT CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL DISTRICT | $21,000 |
| LA COMUNIDAD HISPANA | $20,000 |
| KENNETT AFTER SCHOOL ASSN AFTER THE BELL | $18,750 |
| EDUCATION FOUNDATION OF TETON VALLEY | $18,000 |
| KENNETT AREA COMMUNITY SERVICES | $16,800 |
| PARKESBURG POINT | $15,000 |
| CHELSEAS FUND | $15,000 |
| BRANDYWINE RED CLAY ALLIANCE | $15,000 |
| ONE22 | $15,000 |
| CHESTER COUNTY FOOD BANK | $10,000 |
| NORMAN BIRD SANCTUARY | $10,000 |
| AQUIDNECK ISLAND LAND TRUST | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $337k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
31 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $87k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TOTRUSTEES OF WESTMINSTER SCHOOL INC3× · 2021–2023 · $150k · revenue +1%
- LHLCH Health and Community Services5× · 2021–2025 · $96k · revenue +98%
- EFEDUCATION FOUNDATION OF TETON VALLEY INC4× · 2021–2025 · $72k · revenue +40%
Funded once
- JHJACKSON HOLE LAND TRUSTone grant, 2024 · $20k · revenue +24%
- DUDREXEL UNIVERSITYone grant, 2022 · $15k · revenue +8%
- TGTHE GARAGEone grant, 2023 · $15k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.
The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.
See schedule o.we are inspired by the ideals of our founder who, in 1896, emphasized respect for all people and ideas, who honored knowledge with practice, progress and the common good. our historical commitment to experiential learning…
The mission of westminster college is to help students develop competencies, commitments, and characteristics which have distinguished human beings at their best. see continuation on schedule o.the liberal arts tradition is the foundation…
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…
The western pennsylvania conservancy protects and restores exceptional places to provide our region with clean waters and healthy forests, wildlife and natural areas for the benefit of present and future generations. the conservancy…
Gettysburg college is a residential, undergraduate college of the liberal arts and sciences.
Empowering our community of learners to discover and create better futures.
United way's mission is to end intergenerational poverty in our region by harnessing, leveraging and strategically investing the collective power of donors, advocates and volunteers, to help individuals and families break the cycle of…
Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…
Wheaton college provides a transformative liberal arts education, combining theory and practice, for intellectually curious students within a collaborative and vibrant extended community and network that values and strives to create an…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Seattle Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Drexel University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
36 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 36 of the 55 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF WESTMINSTER SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds LCH Health and Community Services ↗
- Who funds THE PARKESBURG POINT ↗
- Who funds EDUCATION FOUNDATION OF TETON VALLEY INC ↗
- Who funds BRANDYWINE RED CLAY ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds KENNETT AREA COMMUNITY SERVICE ↗
- Who funds FAIRVILLE FRIENDS SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds CHESTER COUNTY FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds CHELSEA'S FUND ↗
- Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF SOUTHERN CHESTER COUNTY ↗
- Who funds One22 Inc ↗
- Who funds THE GARAGE COMMUNITY & YOUTH CENTER ↗
- Who funds YMCA OF GREATER BRANDYWINE ↗
- Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
- Who funds First State Squash Inc ↗
- Who funds LEBANON VALLEY COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds LYCOMING COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds YOUNGMOMS ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN CHESTER COUNTY DAY CARE ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds SLOW FOOD IN THE TETONS INC ↗
- Who funds JACKSON HOLE LAND TRUST ↗
- Who funds SHELTERJH ↗
- Who funds THE ALLIANCE FOR HEALTH EQUITY ↗
- Who funds SURREY SERVICES FOR SENIORS INC ↗
- Who funds DREXEL UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds COATESVILLE YOUTH INITIATIVE ↗
- Who funds AQUIDNECK ISLAND LAND TRUST ↗
- Who funds THE NORMAN BIRD SANCTUARY TRUST ↗
- Who funds UNION COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Chester County Community Foundation · United Way of Chester County Inc · The Philadelphia Foundation · Wsfs Cares Foundation · The Dansko Foundation Inc · The Gordon Charter Foundation · Connelly Foundation · Blue Yak Foundation · Cabot-Kjellerup Foundation · The Fund for Women and Girls · W W Smith Charitable Trust · Claneil Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Applestone Foundation-Ima funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- First State Squash Inc — 7% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Applestone Foundation-Ima?
Find your warmest path to Applestone Foundation-Ima through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.