Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

APF Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$196k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$49k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Religion$1.0MPhilanthropy$91kHuman Services$22kInternational$12kRecreation & Sports$4kYouth Development$2kHousing & Shelter$1kEducation$320Other$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $177k
$22,116
Median grant
6
States reached
$3.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
National Christian Foundation$49,151
National Christian Foundation$40,000
Idlewild Baptist Church$36,989
Idlewild Baptist Church$28,500
The Rosser FoundationICM$22,116
Samaritan's Purse$9,500
One More Child$6,500
InterVarsity Christian Fellowship$2,100
Young Life$1,035
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–19, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Metropolitan Ministries: $1k → 13%Family First: $3k → 13%Family First: $700 → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
WI
IA
OH
PA
UT
CO
MO
VA
AZ
KS
NC
DC
LA
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1000k · 14 repeat orgs$137k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +62% since the first grant, against +49% for the ones you funded once.

14 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
18

Total granted

$1000k
$26k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+62%
+49%

Still filing today

36%
61%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 43% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $111k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionEducationPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TR
    The Rosser Foundation dba International Cooperating Ministries
    7× · 2017–2023 · $314k · revenue +32%
  • SP
    SAMARITAN'S PURSE
    3× · 2017–2025 · $12k · revenue +134%
  • BIBLE STUDY FELLOWSHIP
    4× · 2017–2024 · $8k · revenue +62%

Funded once

  • BH
    BAY HOPE CHURCH INC
    one grant, 2023 · $9k
  • JM
    JESUSONLINE MINISTRIESgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue +67%
  • FO
    FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETESgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $4k · revenue +120%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Bibleproject

Bibleproject's mission is to help people experience the bible as a unified story that leads to jesus. this is achieved by creating biblical videos to be regularly released on a newly-created youtube channel. (continued on schedule o.)each…

Religion
2
Biglife International Inc

Biglife international inc. empowers believers worldwide to reach and disciple their own people for jesus christ.

Recreation & Sports
3
Jewish Voice Ministries Intl

To proclaim the gospel, grow the messianic jewish community and engage the church concerning israel and the jewish people. this is done through education, evangelism and being a movement leader, all with excellence in order to transform…

4
Intentional Life Media

Dedicated to igniting personal transformation by affirming faith, inspiring hope, and equipping individuals, to live an intentional life in christ.

Religion
5
Biblica Inc

To provide the bible in accurate, contemporary translations and formats so that more people around the world will have the opportunity to be transformed by jesus christ.

Religion
6
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

7
Blue Letter Bible

The specific purpose of this corporation is to present a biblical, christian ministry of the gospel, hope, encouragement and strength to as many people as possible. the intent of those who will conduct this corporation's work is to present…

8
Global Outreach International Inc

To get the good news to every nation this generation by showing and sharing god's love by providing opportunities and supporting christian missionaries in over fifty seven countries around the world.

International
9
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
10
International Fellowship of Christian Short-Term Missions Incorporated

To engage in local and overseas evangelism, mission training & supports, empowering churches worldwide to live out the short-term mission movement, where chiristians can participate in sharing the gospel and fulfilling the great commission.

Religion
11
International Fellowship of Evangelical Students Usa Inc

The vision of international fellowship of evangelical students usa, inc. (ifes/usa) is to see students built into communities of disciples, transformed by the gospel, impacting the university, the church, and society for the glory of…

Religion
12
International Partnerships Inc

To provide support for the efforts of christians of the former soviet union in reaching the influencers of their countries for christ.

Religion

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Young Life and the most unlike its peers is Junior Volleyball Association of Austin. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyYouth Sports Booster Organi…Pregnancy Support ServicesFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Community FoundationsFallen First Responder Supp…Christian Missionary Organi…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number27%4%<5yr16%4%5–10yr20%13%10–20yr15%22%20–35yr9%35%35–55yr12%22%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value27%2%<5yr16%0%5–10yr20%2%10–20yr15%67%20–35yr9%5%35–55yr12%25%55yr+

The field is 27% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/25
the rest of the field
17%
17,089/103,019

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/21
Grantees still filing
17/21
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

National Christian Foundation - APF — $506,763 · OtherNational Christian Foundation - APFIDLEWILD BAPTIST CHURCH — $125,899 · OtherIDLEWILD BAPTIST CHURCH+17 more — $55,496 · Other+17 moreThe Rosser Foundation dba International Cooperating Ministries — $313,925 · PhilanthropyThe Rosser Foundation dba International…NATIONAL CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION INC — $89,151 · PhilanthropyNATIONAL CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION INC+2 more — $1,700 · PhilanthropySAMARITAN'S PURSE — $12,200 · ReligionINTERNATIONAL CHRISTIAN RESPONSE USA — $10,000 · ReligionInterVarsity Christian FellowshipUSA — $8,529 · ReligionBIBLE STUDY FELLOWSHIP — $7,556 · ReligionJESUSONLINE MINISTRIES — $5,000 · Religion+1 more — $1,055 · ReligionFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES — $3,900 · Youth DevelopmentYOUNG LIFE — $1,675 · Youth DevelopmentFAMILY FIRST INC — $3,700 · Human ServicesMETROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INC — $1,200 · Human ServicesNORTH FLORIDA PGA FOUNDATION INC — $330 · EducationDENISON UNIVERSITY — $220 · EducationPURE FREEDOM INC — $100 · EducationNEW LIFE SOLUTIONS INC — $311 · Health
Other$688,158Philanthropy$404,776Religion$44,340Youth Development$5,575Human Services$4,900Education$650Health$311

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetThe Rosser Foundation dba International Cooperating Ministries — $313,925 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $12,200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL CHRISTIAN RESPONSE USA — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetInterVarsity Christian FellowshipUSA — $8,529 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBIBLE STUDY FELLOWSHIP — $7,556 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJESUSONLINE MINISTRIES — $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES — $3,900 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY FIRST INC — $3,700 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetYOUNG LIFE — $1,675 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetIMPACT INVESTING CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMETROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INC — $1,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSomebody Cares Tampa Bay Inc — $1,055 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetNEW LIFE SOLUTIONS INC — $311 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJunior Volleyball Association of Austin — $230 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDENISON UNIVERSITY — $220 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDC SCORES — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF TAMPA BAY INC — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPURE FREEDOM INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of Tampa Bay IncFL17.3× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Tampa Bay Inc · Servant Foundation · Chattanooga Christian Community Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization APF Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 4%
  • Florida Sheriffs Association Inc4% of income from government
  • Metropolitan Ministries Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph