Skip to content

· Private foundation

Antinori Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$17k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Religion$40kEducation$26kRecreation & Sports$8kHuman Services$6kArts & Culture$2kPublic Safety & Disaster$2kEnvironment$2kCrime & Legal$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$750
Median grant
4
States reached
$111k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST BRIGID CATHOLIC CHURCH$6,500
ATLANTA WORKSHOP PLAYERS$2,000
OPEN LAND TRUST$1,500
ARCHDIOCESE OF ATLANTA$1,500
ST JOHN VIANNEY CHURCH$1,000
UTAH AVALANCHE CENTER$750
CHILDREN'S DEVELOPMENT ACADEMY$750
MOUNTAIN TRAILS FOUNDATION$750
ST VINCENT DEPAUL SOCIETY$500
BANKHEAD BOYS ASSOCIATION$500
COUNTRY CLUB OF THE SOUTH CHARITY GUILD$500
Individual grant recipient$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 91% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%ANGEL FLIGHT: $1k → 15%HELP OF BEAUFORT: $2k → 10%HELP OF BEAUFORT: $1k → 10%ST VINCENT DE PAUL: $750 → 14%HELP OF BEAUFORT: $750 → 10%PEACE HOUSE INC: $500 → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$70k · 10 repeat orgs$18k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +80% since the first grant, against +49% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
8

Total granted

$70k
$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+80%
+49%

Still filing today

50%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 29% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationEnvironmentCrime & LegalArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CD
    CHILDREN'S DEVELOPMENT ACADEMY INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $13k · revenue +83%
  • MT
    MOUNTAIN TRAILS FOUNDATION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $4k · revenue +73%
  • CC
    Country Club of the South Charity Guild
    7× · 2019–2025 · $4k · revenue +90%

Funded once

  • CA
    CATHOLIC ARCHDIOCESE OF ATLANTA
    one grant, 2022 · $2k
  • CA
    CHILD ABUSE PREVENTION ASSOCIATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $1k · revenue +49%
  • AF
    ANGEL FLIGHT INC
    one grant, 2021 · $1k · revenue -67%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Air Charity Network

the organization's mission through its members, it to provide access for people in need seeking free air transportation to specialized health care facilities or distant destinations due to family, community or national crisis.

Public Safety & Disaster
2
Aeroangel Inc

Since 2010, aeroangel has provided free private jet flights primarily for seriously ill children needing travel to and from distant, life-saving medical care. aeroangel is a unique, national aviation charity that uses only private jets…

Health
3
The Childrens Haven Inc

To promote the health and happiness of children impacted by abuse. We are committed to building successful children by providing programs that ensure their safety, advocate on their behalf and respond to meet their needs.

Civil Rights
4
Compassion Airlift Llc

Free medical related air transportation to individuals qualified through the Angel Flight organizations, Patient Airlift Services (PALs) or Lifeline Pilots organizations.

Health
5
Miracle Flights

Miracle flights is a national charity that provides free commercial airline tickets for u.s. residents in need of distant medical care not available in their own communities.

—
6
Meals on Wheels Atlanta Inc

To support senior independence through meals, shelter, education, and community.

Human Services
7
Angel House of Georgia Inc

Provide a rehabilitation center for women recovering from alcohol and drug addiction

Housing & Shelter
8
Partnership Against Domestic Violence Inc

The partnership against domestic violence, inc. (padv) works to end the crime of domestic violence and to empower its survivors

—
9
Community Advanced Practice Nursesinc

The mission of the Community Advanced Practice Nurses (CAPN) is to strengthen the lives of persons who are medically underserved and to help interrupt the cycle of poverty and homelessness for these individuals. Healthy independence is…

—
10
Dougherty County Casa Inc

Dougherty County CASA, Inc. supports children who have experienced abuse or neglect by providing specially trained community volunteers to advocate for their best interests -- promoting their safety, stability, and permanent connections to…

Civil Rights
11
Atlanta Victim Assistance Inc

Provide victims of crime with comprehensive services for the successful transition of victim to survivor.

Human Services
12
Aerial Recovery

Aerial recovery's mission is to save lives and stop evil. through the creation and deployment of humanitarian special operators, aerial recovery brings together selected veterans, first responders, and mission-qualified civilians who,…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Angel Flight Soars Inc; the most unlike its peers is Country Club of the South Charity Guild. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
10/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST BRIGID CHURCH: $25,500 · OtherST BRIGID CHURCHCHILDREN'S DEVELOPMENT ACADEMY INC: $12,650 · OtherCHILDREN'S DEVELOPMENT ACADEMY INCJESUIT HIGH SCHOOL: $9,000 · OtherJESUIT HIGH SCHOOLST BRIGID CATHOLIC CHURCH: $6,500 · OtherST BRIGID CATHOLIC CHURCHARCHDIOCESE OF ATLANTA: $4,500 · OtherARCHDIOCESE OF ATLANTAST VINCENT DEPAUL SOCIETY: $4,300 · OtherST VINCENT DEPAUL SOCIETYCountry Club of the South Charity Guild: $3,500 · Other+7 more: $7,000 · Other+7 moreHELP OF BEAUFORT: $3,250 · Human ServicesANGEL FLIGHT INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL GEORGIA INC: $750 · Human ServicesPeace House Inc: $500 · Human ServicesMOUNTAIN TRAILS FOUNDATION: $4,250 · EnvironmentAtlanta Workshop Players Inc: $2,000 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF UTAH AVALANCHE FORE CAST CENTER INC: $1,250 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $500 · EducationCHILD ABUSE PREVENTION ASSOCIATION: $1,000 · Crime & LegalBANKHEAD BOYS ASSOCIATION INC: $500 · Youth Development
Other$72,950Human Services$5,500Environment$4,250Arts & Culture$2,000Education$1,750Crime & Legal$1,000Youth Development$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHILDREN'S DEVELOPMENT ACADEMY INC: $12,650 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetMOUNTAIN TRAILS FOUNDATION: $4,250 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCountry Club of the South Charity Guild: $3,500 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetHELP OF BEAUFORT: $3,250 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF UTAH AVALANCHE FORE CAST CENTER INC: $1,250 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCHILD ABUSE PREVENTION ASSOCIATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetANGEL FLIGHT INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL GEORGIA INC: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANGEL FLIGHT SOARS INC: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPeace House Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHILDREN'S DEVELOPMENT ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds MOUNTAIN TRAILS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Country Club of the South Charity Guild ↗
  • Who funds HELP OF BEAUFORT ↗
  • Who funds Atlanta Workshop Players Inc ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF UTAH AVALANCHE FORE CAST CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILD ABUSE PREVENTION ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds ANGEL FLIGHT INC ↗
  • Who funds SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL GEORGIA INC ↗
  • Who funds ANGEL FLIGHT SOARS INC ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Peace House Inc ↗
  • Who funds BANKHEAD BOYS ASSOCIATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta IncGA12.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Network for Good · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Antinori Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Antinori Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Antinori Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Antinori Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Antinori Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph