Skip to content

· Private foundation

Annmarie Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$463k
Granted FY2024still arriving
171
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$15k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

98% of Annmarie Foundation Inc’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Eau Claire Community Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 20 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2024, the last year Annmarie Foundation Inc named its own grantees at scale: 32 organizations, $463k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

31
’21
12
’22
32
’23
32
’24
20
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Philanthropy$11MEducation$1.0MArts & Culture$99kRecreation & Sports$77kYouth Development$50kScience & Tech$48kHuman Services$28kHealth$20kOther$0
02FY2024 · 171 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k166 grants · $403k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $60k
$2,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PHILLIPS SCHOOL DISTRICT$15,430
EAU CLAIRE SCHOOL DISTRICT$13,520
REGIS CATHOLIC SCHOOLS$10,434
EAU CLAIRE SCHOOL DISTRICT$10,312
PHILLIPS YOUTH BASEBALL$10,000
MEDFORD SCHOOL DISTRICT$9,565
PHILLIPS SCHOOL DISTRICT$9,152
PABLO CENTER AT THE CONFLUENCE$9,094
RIVER FALLS SCHOOL DISTRICT$8,500
CHIPPEWA FALLS SCHOOL DISTRICT (CHIPPEWA FALLS AREA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT$8,000
REGIS CATHOLIC SCHOOLS$7,893
NEW RICHMOND SCHOOL DISTRICT$7,105
EAU CLAIRE SCHOOL DISTRICT$6,805
MEDFORD SCHOOL DISTRICT$6,714
GLENWOOD CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT$6,549
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 37% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%BASICS FOR LOCAL KIDS: $1k → 9%BASICS FOR LOCAL KIDS: $1k → 9%INTERFAITH CAREGIVERS OF POLK COUNTY: $420 → 9%PIERCE COUNTY HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION: $500 → 9%PARK VIEW HOME: $1k → 5%SANDBOX: $1k → 11%SANDBOX: $1k → 11%ABIDING CARE PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER: $400 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

71%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.0M · 77 repeat orgs$410k to everyone else

77 repeat relationships: 55 still active in FY2024, 22 since wound down; 97 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call). Read against FY2024, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

77
131

Total granted

$1.0M
$226k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
+12%

Still filing today

26%
15%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $40k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesHealthRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CONFLUENCE COUNCIL INC
    3× · 2021–2024 · $22k · revenue +63%
  • HG
    HOPE GOSPEL MISSION INC
    3× · 2021–2025 · $6k · revenue +12%
  • PC
    PHIPPS CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC
    3× · 2021–2024 · $6k · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • EC
    EAU CLAIRE CITY-COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT
    one grant, 2022 · $8k
  • ES
    ELLSWORTH SCHOOL DISTRICT
    one grant, 2021 · $6k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Pepin County Child Care Services in

Provide educational child care services to children ages one month through seventeen years of age in our rual community.

—
2
Christian Community Child Center Inc

We believe that all children are special & unique. Our goal is to create a safe, loving environment where children can learn & be nurtured. We offer children 6 wks to 10 yrs a program emphasizing a child's total development: physical,…

Human Services
3
Rainbow Childcare of Monroe Inc

Rainbow Childcare Inc. is a not for profit child care agency committed to providing quality, affordable, learning-oriented child care to the greater Green County community. We serve the children enrolled at Rainbow Childcare, Inc. and…

Human Services
4
People Care Inc

Our goal is to have a significant and positive influence on each child in our care.

Human Services
5
Little Forest School Inc

Childcare

—
6
Coulee Children's Center Inc

Coulee childrens center, a provider of childcare services proudly empowers and strengthen families by focusing on healthy development and school readiness

—
7
Headwaters Council for the Performing Arts Inc

Musical arts programs for Eagle River, Wisconsin

—
8
Osage Community Daycare

Providing day care services to mitchell county, iowa, and the surrounding area. 50 to 70 children are serviced on a daily basis.

Human Services
9
Apple Daycare Inc

Provide a well rounded, affordable and dependable daycare facility for parents with children growing up in a rural north iowa area.

Human Services
10
Merrill Community Homeless Center Inc

To provide shelter to the homeless community in merrill wi

Housing & Shelter
11
Hope House of St Croix Valley

Hope house of st. croix valley provides people experiencing life-changing health challenges access to compassionate care that respects their dignity and choices.

Housing & Shelter
12
University Avenue Daycare Inc dba University Avenue Discovery Center

Our pursuit is to emphasize equality, solidarity, emotional literacy, and exploration of the arts within our classrooms and surrounding community. It is our goal to build on a child's academic foundation with play based learning, hands-on…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Bridge to Hope; the most unlike its peers is Colafax Railroad Museum Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

53 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 53 of the 307 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
50/53
Grantees still filing
29/53
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

EAU CLAIRE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10,929,359 · PhilanthropyEAU CLAIRE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION+2 more: $8,250 · PhilanthropyEAU CLAIRE SCHOOL DISTRICT: $99,281 · OtherEAU CLAIRE …PHILLIPS SCHOOL DISTRICT: $81,232 · OtherPHILLIPS SC…MEDFORD SCHOOL DISTRICT: $66,612 · OtherMEDFORD SCH…NEW RICHMOND SCHOOL DISTRICT: $62,784 · OtherHUDSON SCHOOL DISTRICT: $59,525 · OtherREGIS CATHOLIC SCHOOLS INC: $48,136 · Other+177 more: $820,479 · Other+177 moreCONFLUENCE COUNCIL INC: $21,844 · Arts & CultureCHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF EAU CLAIRE INC: $9,550 · Arts & CulturePHIPPS CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC: $5,500 · Arts & CultureEAU CLAIRE ASSOCIATION OF MUSEUMS INC: $5,375 · Arts & CultureHUEYS HIDEAWAY CHILDRENS MUSEUM INC: $4,099 · Arts & CultureAMERY AREA HISTORICAL SOCIETY AND MUSEUM INC: $3,792 · Arts & CultureCOLAFAX RAILROAD MUSEUM INC: $3,060 · Arts & CultureMenomonie Theater Guild Inc: $2,145 · Arts & CultureCHIPPEWA VALLEY HEALTH CLINIC INC: $4,550 · HealthMOMS AND DADS AGAINST METH INC: $3,769 · HealthTAYLOR COUNTY SUPPORTIVE HOUSING: $7,200 · Housing & ShelterSAND BOX INC: $2,000 · Human ServicesBASICS FOR LOCAL KIDS INC: $2,000 · Human ServicesRAINBOW GYMNASTICS INC: $3,800 · Recreation & Sports
Philanthropy$10,937,609Other$1,238,049Arts & Culture$55,365Health$8,319Housing & Shelter$7,200Human Services$4,000Recreation & Sports$3,800

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCONFLUENCE COUNCIL INC: $21,844 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF EAU CLAIRE INC: $9,550 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetTAYLOR COUNTY SUPPORTIVE HOUSING: $7,200 over 2y, 4.7% of budgetHOPE GOSPEL MISSION INC: $6,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPHIPPS CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC: $5,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetEAU CLAIRE ASSOCIATION OF MUSEUMS INC: $5,375 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetTHE BRIDGE TO HOPE: $4,876 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetCHIPPEWA VALLEY HEALTH CLINIC INC: $4,550 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetHUEYS HIDEAWAY CHILDRENS MUSEUM INC: $4,099 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetRAINBOW GYMNASTICS INC: $3,800 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetAMERY AREA HISTORICAL SOCIETY AND MUSEUM INC: $3,792 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetMOMS AND DADS AGAINST METH INC: $3,769 over 4y, 4.8% of budgetFOREST SPRINGS CAMP AND CONFERENCE CENTER INC: $3,700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDUNN COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $3,500 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF THE NORTHWESTERN GREAT LAKES INC: $3,302 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOLAFAX RAILROAD MUSEUM INC: $3,060 over 1y, 14% of budgetHudson Area Backpack and Food Program Inc: $3,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetSTEPPING STONES OF DUNN COUNTY INC: $2,160 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMenomonie Theater Guild Inc: $2,145 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetSAND BOX INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetEAU CLAIRE AREA HMONG MUTUAL ASSIST: $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetST CROIX VALLEY SART INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetFAMILY RESOURCE CENTER ST CROIX VALLEY INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds EAU CLAIRE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CONFLUENCE COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF EAU CLAIRE INC ↗
  • Who funds TAYLOR COUNTY SUPPORTIVE HOUSING ↗
  • Who funds HOPE GOSPEL MISSION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Green Bay Packers FoundationWI49.6× affinity26 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Green Bay Packers Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · Mayo Clinic Group Return · Pablo Foundation Inc · Otto Bremer Trust · Rcu Foundation Inc · Eau Claire Community Foundation · Hugh J Andersen Foundation · St Croix Valley Foundation · The Nordson Corporation Foundation · Andersen Corporate Foundation · United Way of the Greater Chippewa Valley Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Annmarie Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Annmarie Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    16report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Annmarie Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Annmarie Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 307 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Annmarie’s filings →

    More from the funding graph