Skip to content

· Private foundation

Annette M Williams Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$755k
Granted FY2024still arriving
42
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$153k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$1.0MYouth Development$891kHuman Services$821kEducation$798kReligion$502kHousing & Shelter$348kArts & Culture$343kFood & Nutrition$306kOther$0
02FY2024 · 42 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k21 grants · $71k
  • $10k–50k16 grants · $286k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $398k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$13M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DIGNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION$153,000
EASTERN OTTAWA YOUNG LIFE$90,000
MISSION EDGE-SWITCHFOOT BRO-AM FOUNDATION$55,000
PMBA$50,000
FAMILY SERVICE ASSOCIATION OF REDLANDS$50,000
YUCAIPA HIGH SCHOOL$49,995
Individual grant recipient$27,500
CRU - UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN$24,000
ABIDE MINISTRIES$20,000
GEORGETOWN HARMONY HOMES$20,000
PRESCOTT CENTER FOR THE ARTS$20,000
STARLITE SHORES FAMILY CAMP$20,000
HAND TO HAND$20,000
HUDSONVILLE EDUCATION FOUNDATION$15,000
CAL STATE SAN BERNARDINO FOUNDATION$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $312k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 89% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%YAVAPAI FOOD BANK: $40k → 14%YAVAPAI FOOD BANK: $20k → 14%YAVAPAI FOOD BANK: $20k → 14%STATER BROS CHARITIES: $5k → 14%STATER BROS CHARITIES: $5k → 14%INLAND EMPIRE LIGHT HOUSE FOR THE BLIND: $3k → 14%YAVAPAI FOOD BANK: $10k → 14%STATER BROS CHARITIES: $3k → 14%STATER BROS CHARITIES: $2k → 14%HEART OF NEIGHBORING: $10k → 8%INLAND EMPIRE LIGHT HOUSE FOR THE BLIND: $1k → 14%HEART OF NEIGHBORING: $10k → 8%HEART OF NEIGHBORING: $10k → 8%HEART OF NEIGHBORING: $5k → 8%INLAND EMPIRE LIGHT HOUSE FOR THE BLIND: $1k → 14%UNFORGETTABLES FOUNDATION: $3k → 14%INLAND EMPIRE LIGHT HOUSE FOR THE BLIND: $1k → 14%CHILDREN'S FUND: $1k → 14%CHILDREN'S FUND: $1k → 14%UNFORGETTABLES FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%UNFORGETTABLES FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%FAMILY SERVICE ASSOCIATION OF REDLANDS: $50k → 14%FAMILY SERVICE ASSOCIATION OF REDLANDS: $13k → 14%FAMILY SERVICE ASSOCIATION OF REDLANDS: $10k → 14%FAMILY SERVICE ASSOCIATION OF REDLANDS: $10k → 14%YMCA OF THE EAST VALLEY: $5k → 14%YMCA OF THE EAST VALLEY: $5k → 14%YMCA OF THE EAST VALLEY: $5k → 14%FAMILY SERVICE ASSOCIATION OF REDLANDS: $5k → 14%YMCA OF THE EAST VALLEY: $1k → 14%SMILES FOR SENIORS: $1k → 14%SANTA CLAUS INC: $10k → 14%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF SAN BERNARDINO: $8k → 14%SANTA CLAUS INC: $5k → 14%SANTA CLAUS INC: $5k → 14%SANTA CLAUS INC: $5k → 14%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF SAN BERNARDINO: $3k → 14%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF SAN BERNARDINO: $3k → 14%SANTA CLAUS INC: $8k → 14%FRIENDS OF SANTA CLAUS INC: $5k → 14%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF SAN BERNARDINO: $2k → 14%FRIENDS OF THE CENTER FOR INDIVIDUAL DEVELOPMENT: $2k → 14%FRIENDS OF THE CENTER FOR INDIVIDUAL DEVELOPMENT: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.8M · 81 repeat orgs$647k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +50% since the first grant, against +22% for those funded once.

81 repeat relationships: 35 still active in FY2024, 46 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

81
55

Total granted

$4.8M
$531k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
+22%

Still filing today

48%
27%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $116k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthEducationArts & CultureAnimalsPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GH
    Georgetown Harmony Homes
    7× · 2018–2024 · $190k · revenue +55%
  • B2
    BEYOND 26 INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $153k · revenue +530% · 48% of their budget
  • SS
    STARLITE SHORES FAMILY CAMP
    8× · 2017–2024 · $125k · revenue +75%

Funded once

  • M
    MEMBA
    one grant, 2022 · $50k
  • HH
    HARMONY HOMES
    one grant, 2017 · $45k
  • TS
    THE SALVATION ARMY
    one grant, 2018 · $33k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Habitat for Humanity San Bernardino Area Inc

Seeking to put God's love into action, Habitat for Humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope. To make low-cost home ownership available to low-income families.

—
2
Community Health Association Inland Southern Region

We exist to support our membership and community parnters to ensure acessible high-quality, and cost-effictve health services.

—
3
Community Impact Central Valley

To deliver comprehensive health and human service programs that improve the health and well-being of under-served california residents.

Health
4
The Greater Coachella Valley Chamber of Commerce

The Greater Coachella Valley Chamber of Commerce is a regional chamber formed in 2016 to support a diverse business community that spans nearly forty-five miles and serves the needs of nearly 500,000 visitors each year. As a business…

Community Improvement
5
The Samaritan Center-Simi Valley

The mission of the Samaritan Center-Simi Valley is to offer people experiencing housing and food insecurity supportive services essential to human dignity.

Housing & Shelter
6
Sonora Area Foundation

Strengthens its community through assisting donors, making grants, and providing leadership.

Philanthropy
7
Sierra Health Foundation Center for Health Program Management

To provide leadership, funding and operational support for projects that improve individual and community health status and well being in underserved communities.

Health
8
San Bernardino Area Chamber of Commerce

To promote the commercial, industrial and civic welfare of the people of San Bernardino by encouraging the production and distribution of goods and services through the creation of more jobs and by enhancing the productivity and…

—
9
San Bernardino Children'S Benefit Associ

Provides complete professional dental services to uninsured and underinsured children between the ages of 3 to 18 living in the San Bernardino and surrounding communities including Colton, Highland and Muscoy. Services are provided for a…

—
10
San Fernando Valley Interfaith Council Inc

With compassion, collaboration and commitment to action, vic provides services and program that engage and enrich the lives of older adults, families, and youth through a lens of inclusion to strengthen diverse communities in the valley

Human Services
11
Adventist Health Foundation

The Foundation's mission is to endeavor to support programs and projects that measurably improve the physical and emotional health and health, wholeness and hope is coupled with a vision to transform the well-being in Paradise, and the…

Health
12
San Diego and Imperial Counties Labor Council Afl-Cio

The Labor Council offers an avenue for local unions to come together as one group.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Fund Inc; the most unlike its peers is San Bernardino Valley Concert Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

60 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 60 of the 147 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
20
Early backer (in before they grew)
60/60
Grantees still filing
41/60
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

EASTERN OTTAWA YOUNG LIFE: $391,000 · OtherEASTERN OTTAWA YOUNG LIFEYUCAIPA HIGH SCHOOL: $204,995 · OtherYUCAIPA HIGH SCHOOLIndividual grant recipient: $195,000 · OtherJAMES FAMILY YMCA PRESCOTT: $185,800 · OtherAQUINAS HIGH SCHOOL: $165,000 · OtherCRU - UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $153,000 · OtherSWITCHFOOT BRO-AM FOUNDATION: $135,000 · OtherREADY FOR LIFE: $125,000 · Other+110 more: $2,172,100 · Other+110 moreDIGNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION: $653,000 · HealthDIGNITY HEALTH …STARLITE SHORES FAMILY CAMP: $125,000 · HealthSTARLITE SHORES…+2 more: $13,500 · HealthGeorgetown Harmony Homes: $190,000 · Human ServicesGeorgetown…Yavapai Food Bank Inc: $90,000 · Human ServicesYavapai Fo…Family Service Association of Redlands: $87,500 · Human ServicesFamily Ser…THE HEART OF NEIGHBORING: $35,000 · Human ServicesTHE HEART …Santa Claus Inc of Greater San Bernardino: $32,500 · Human ServicesSanta Clau…+9 more: $66,500 · Human Services+9 moreABIDE MINISTRIES INC: $105,000 · ReligionSET FREE MINISTRIES: $75,000 · ReligionBEYOND 26 INC: $153,000 · EmploymentUCLA FOUNDATION: $85,000 · EducationCAL MED FOUNDATION: $22,500 · EducationSan Bernardino City Library Foundation: $15,500 · EducationTHE GARNER HOLT FOUNDATION: $7,500 · EducationCRAFTON HILLS COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Education+2 more: $1,224 · EducationHAND2HAND: $125,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$3,726,895Health$791,500Human Services$501,500Religion$180,000Employment$153,000Education$136,724Food & Nutrition$125,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDIGNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION: $653,000 over 7y, 16% of budgetGeorgetown Harmony Homes: $190,000 over 7y, 5.9% of budgetBEYOND 26 INC: $153,000 over 7y, 48% of budgetSTARLITE SHORES FAMILY CAMP: $125,000 over 8y, 7.7% of budgetHAND2HAND: $125,000 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetABIDE MINISTRIES INC: $105,000 over 5y, 3.5% of budgetSHARLOT HALL HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF AZ: $97,000 over 6y, 2.7% of budgetCOALITION FOR COMPASSION & JUSTICE: $90,500 over 4y, 3.5% of budgetYavapai Food Bank Inc: $90,000 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetFamily Service Association of Redlands: $87,500 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION: $85,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSET FREE MINISTRIES: $75,000 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetLEGAL AID SOCIETY OF SAN BERNARDINO INC: $47,500 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetTHE HEART OF NEIGHBORING: $35,000 over 4y, 43% of budgetSanta Claus Inc of Greater San Bernardino: $32,500 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetGRAND RAPIDS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPrescott Area Shelter Services Inc: $30,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetNATIONAL ORANGE SHOW: $27,500 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetCAL MED FOUNDATION: $22,500 over 3y, 98% of budgetArrowhead United Way: $19,750 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetYAVAPAI HUMANE SOCIETY: $18,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetYMCA of the East Valley: $16,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSAN BERNARDINO VALLEY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $16,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetSan Bernardino City Library Foundation: $15,500 over 5y, 25% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS MICHIGAN INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFAMILY SERVICE ASSOCIATION: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAssistance League of San Bernardino: $15,000 over 4y, 3.7% of budgetStater Bros Charities: $14,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTime For Change Foundation: $12,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $12,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORDNET INC: $11,500 over 4y, 3.3% of budgetFRIENDS OF CAROLINE PARK: $10,500 over 6y, 5.5% of budgetTHE DOMINGUEZ DREAM IN MEMORY OF H FRANK DOMINGUEZ: $10,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetREDLANDS CONSERVANCY: $10,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetInland Congregations United for Change Sponsoring Committee Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSAN BERNARDINO VALLEY CONCERT ASSOCIATION: $9,000 over 3y, 7.5% of budgetHumane Society of San Bernardino Valley: $8,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMISS KITTYS CAT HOUSE: $8,000 over 2y, 5.4% of budgetTHE GARNER HOLT FOUNDATION: $7,500 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetSan Bernardino Symphony Orchestra: $6,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetINLAND EMPIRE LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND: $5,500 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetInland Empire Community Foundation: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNFORGETTABLES FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetFriends of Santa Claus Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 8.3% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER REDLA RIVERSIDE: $4,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetKIWANIS CLUB OF REDLANDS: $3,200 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetCHILDREN'S FUND INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMOUNTAINS COMMUNITY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DIGNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Georgetown Harmony Homes ↗
  • Who funds BEYOND 26 INC ↗
  • Who funds STARLITE SHORES FAMILY CAMP ↗
  • Who funds HAND2HAND ↗
  • Who funds ABIDE MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds SHARLOT HALL HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF AZ ↗
  • Who funds COALITION FOR COMPASSION & JUSTICE ↗
  • Who funds Yavapai Food Bank Inc ↗
  • Who funds Family Service Association of Redlands ↗
  • Who funds UCLA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SET FREE MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds LEGAL AID SOCIETY OF SAN BERNARDINO INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HEART OF NEIGHBORING ↗
  • Who funds Santa Claus Inc of Greater San Bernardino ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Inland Empire Community FoundationCA42× affinity20 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Inland Empire Community Foundation · Arizona Community Foundation · Weingart Foundation · Arrowhead United Way · Sempra Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · The California Endowment · The Lossett Family Foundation · Pinky and Joe Brier Foundation · Margaret T Morris Foundation · Bnsf Railway Foundation · The James Irvine Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Annette M Williams Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Annette M Williams Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Annette M Williams Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Annette M Williams Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 147 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Annette M Williams’ filings →

    More from the funding graph