Skip to content

California · Public charity

Anita Borg Institute for Technology

Our mission is to get our community in tech skilled, hired, promoted, paid, and funded, so they can thrive, lead, and drive innovation for a more impartial and sustainable future.

$248k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
2
Itemized grants FY2024
2
Organizations funded FY2023
50%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2024
$75k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2024
$50,000
Largest grant, FY2024
$50,000
Organizations funded a year
2 to 26
FY2017 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
2
Total assets, FY2024
$24M

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 50% of the organizations Anita Borg Institute for Technology funded were first-time grantees, receiving 23% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23
EducationYouth DevelopmentCivil RightsEnvironmentRecreation & SportsScience & TechOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving2$75k100%
FY20232$33k50%
FY20226$563k83%
FY20212$195k0%
FY202026$844k23%
FY201924$791k33%
FY201823$645k35%
FY201719$600kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$2.6MCommunity Improvement$260kYouth Development$252kHealth$200kCivil Rights$150kRecreation & Sports$100kEnvironment$75kScience & Tech$62kOther$0

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
ND
MN
IL
WI
NY
PA
NJ
CA
CO
NE
MO
MD
AZ
NC
SC
DC
TX
FL

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Digital Harbor Foundation$435,000311%
Regents Univ of California$360,0004n/a
Zebra Youth Inc$200,00018%
Florida Access Network$200,000129%
The Joseph Center$140,00042%
Equality Florida Institute Inc$125,00021%
University of South Carolina Educational Foundation$120,00040%
Villanova University$120,00040%
University of Illinois Foundation$120,00040%
The University of Texas Foundation Inc$120,00040%
Show all 49 grantees
All grantees of Anita Borg Institute for Technology by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Digital Harbor Foundation$435,000311%
Regents Univ of California$360,0004n/a
Zebra Youth Inc$200,00018%
Florida Access Network$200,000129%
The Joseph Center$140,00042%
Equality Florida Institute Inc$125,00021%
University of South Carolina Educational Foundation$120,00040%
Villanova University$120,00040%
University of Illinois Foundation$120,00040%
The University of Texas Foundation Inc$120,00040%
University of Nebraska Foundation$120,00040%
Harvey Mudd College$120,00030%
Foundation at Nj Institute of Technology$120,0004n/a
University of Maryland College Park Foundation Inc$120,0004n/a
University of Rochester$120,00040%
University of Wisconsin$116,2884n/a
University of California Irvine Foundation$112,97040%
University of North Texas$90,0003n/a
University of Vermont and State Agricultural College$90,0003n/a
Arizona State University Foundation for a New American University$70,00030%
University of Maryland Baltimore Foundation Inc$60,00020%
Arizona State University$60,0002n/a
Missouri Technology Corporation$60,00021%
Curators of the University of Missouri$60,0002n/a
University of Maryland Foundation Inc$56,20220%
Prairie Products International LLC$50,0001n/a
Association for Computing Machinery Inc$37,95030%
University of Vermont and State Agricultural College Foundation Inc$30,00010%
University of North Texas Foundation Inc$30,00010%
Amie Inc$26,0001n/a
Blavity Inc$25,0001n/a
Women Who Code Inc Case #24-51556$25,0001n/a
Gpra Strategic Management Inc$20,0001n/a
National Center for Women and Information Technology$20,00010%
Amie Inc$20,00013%
Software Freedom Conservancy Inc$19,5001n/a
Catawba Valley Community College Foundation Inc$19,4001n/a
Thurgood Marshall College Fund$15,00010%
Partnership for Public Service Inc$15,00010%
The Bail Project Inc$10,41910%
Start Somewhere LLC$10,0001n/a
Center for Black Innovation Inc$10,00011%
Mills College$10,00020%
Chicago Tech Academy$7,50010%
Cmd-It Inc$7,50011%
Regents of the University of California at Irvine$7,0301n/a
Startup Grind Inc$5,0001n/a
Metropolitan Washington DC Chapter of NCBW100$5,0001n/a
Association for Women in Computing Twin Cities Chapter$5,0001n/a

Where it is load-bearing

Anita Borg Institute for Technology supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 1 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 29 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDigital Harbor Foundation: $435,000 over 3y, 11% of budgetZebra Youth Inc: $200,000 over 1y, 8.0% of budgetFlorida Access Network: $200,000 over 1y, 29% of budgetThe Joseph Center: $140,000 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetEquality Florida Institute Inc: $125,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetUniversity of South Carolina Educational Foundation: $120,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetVillanova University: $120,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Illinois Foundation: $120,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetThe University of Texas Foundation Inc: $120,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetUniversity of Nebraska Foundation: $120,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHarvey Mudd College: $120,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetUniversity of Rochester: $120,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of California Irvine Foundation: $112,970 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetArizona State University Foundation for a New American University: $70,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Maryland Baltimore Foundation Inc: $60,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMissouri Technology Corporation: $60,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetUniversity of Maryland Foundation Inc: $56,202 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAssociation for Computing Machinery Inc: $37,950 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Vermont and State Agricultural College Foundation Inc: $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUniversity of North Texas Foundation Inc: $30,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNational Center for Women and Information Technology: $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAmie Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetThurgood Marshall College Fund: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPartnership for Public Service Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Bail Project Inc: $10,419 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCenter for Black Innovation Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetMills College: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetChicago Tech Academy: $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCmd-It Inc: $7,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 29.

Nonprofits that may fit its grantmaking

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ford FoundationNY11.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ford Foundation · Tides Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Anita Borg Institute for Technology with peer funders

About Anita Borg Institute for Technology

How much does Anita Borg Institute for Technology give?
Anita Borg Institute for Technology reported 2 itemized grants totaling $75,000, out of $248,400 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 2 and 26 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2023.
What does Anita Borg Institute for Technology fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2024, its largest causes are Education (68%), Community Improvement (7%), Youth Development (7%).
Who are Anita Borg Institute for Technology's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2024: Digital Harbor Foundation ($435k), Regents Univ of California ($360k), Zebra Youth Inc ($200k).
Does Anita Borg Institute for Technology fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 50% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as Anita Borg Institute for Technology?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include The Ford Foundation, Tides Foundation, Silicon Valley Community Foundation.
Where is Anita Borg Institute for Technology based?
Anita Borg Institute for Technology is based in CA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 51 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Anita Borg Institute for Technology’s filings →

More from the funding graph