Skip to content

Missouri · Nonprofit

MISSOURI TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION

MISSOURI TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION (Missouri) receives grants from 1 organization whose IRS filings report $60,000 to it, the largest being ANITA BORG INSTITUTE FOR TECHNOLOGY ($60,000). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$11M
Funders on record
1
Grants received
$60k
Net assets
$96M
1/1 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 1%
01What it does

What Missouri Technology Corporation does

Mission

The mission of the mtc is to provide leadership and make strategic investments that help entrepreneurs create and grow technology-based missouri businesses.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. The missouri technology investment program funds are used to support mtc's operations and its programmatic activities, which are focused on ecosystem building and a state-sponsored venture capital program. Through these programs, mtc provides competitive-based grant funding to organizations offering resources and training to entrepreneurs to enhance the state's entrepreneurial capacity and makes direct equity-based investments in promising early-stage startups through the innovation, development, and entrepreneurial advancement (idea) fund. The funds also support mtc's sponsorship program, which provides a structured process for funding events that align with mtc's mission to catalyze innovation and entrepreneurship in missouri.

    $8,738,837 spentof which $8,107,975 as grants$84,698 earned by the program
    50% of program spending
  2. The state small business credit initiative (ssbci 2.0) is a program administered by the u.s. Department of treasury to support state programs to increase the amount of private capital available to small businesses and to cover reasonable administrative expenses. Mtc uses the ssbci program funds to support its innovation, development, and entrepreneurial advancement (idea) fund co-investment program that makes direct investments into missouri-based technology startups to support technology and business development in the state.

    $8,762,048 spentof which $8,312,046 as grants
    50% of program spending
  3. The state small business credit initiative (ssbci) is a program administered by the u.s. Department of treasury to support state programs to increase the amount of private capital made available to small businesses and to cover reasonable administrative expenses. Mtc uses the ssbci program funds to support its innovation, development, and entrepreneurial advancement (idea) fund co-investment program which that makes direct investments into missouri-based technology startups to support technology and business development in the state.

    $0 spent
    0% of program spending
  4. The national geospatial-intelligence agency (nga) is a combination of intelligence agency and combat support agency. Nga seeks to advance its technology transfer efforts for the commercialization of federally developed technology. Through a partnership with mtc, nga engages with partners in the greater st. Louis region to drive innovation in geospatial technology through collaboration and a transfer of technology and subject matter expertise. Mtc is tasked with launching and coordinating competitive programs designed to deliver innovative and commercially viable solutions that either match nga's or their customer's current and future technology needs.the lewis and clark discovery initiative provides funds to mtc for loans and grants to missouri-based high tech small businesses.the advanced manufacturing resiliency grant program provides grant funding to create infrastructure for industries that are fundamental to u.s. National security where manufacturing of essential products relies on foreign sources. The program focuses on areas where missouri has an inherent connection or advantage to support significant growth in missouri's economy, including but not limited to advanced and…

    $0 spent$1,226 earned by the program
    0% of program spending

The 4 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $17,500,885.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($13M) Expenses 100 ($10M) Net assets 100 ($58M)2018 Revenue 32 ($4.0M) Expenses 98 ($10M) Net assets 90 ($52M)2019 Revenue 87 ($11M) Expenses 56 ($5.8M) Net assets 98 ($57M)2020 Revenue 10 ($1.3M) Expenses 58 ($6.0M) Net assets 90 ($52M)2021 Revenue 58 ($7.2M) Expenses 40 ($4.1M) Net assets 96 ($55M)2022 Revenue 97 ($12M) Expenses 64 ($6.6M) Net assets 105 ($61M)2023 Revenue 460 ($58M) Expenses 190 ($20M) Net assets 171 ($99M)2024 Revenue 213 ($27M) Expenses 177 ($18M) Net assets 186 ($107M)2025 Revenue 89 ($11M) Expenses 220 ($23M) Net assets 166 ($96M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (89)Expenses (220)Net assets (166)

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2022 to 2023, from $62M to $113M (+82%).

$63M
$57M
$60M
$54M
$57M
$62M
$113M
$121M
$105M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 114% · 2018 62% · 2019 29% · 2020 38% · 2021 46% · 2022 60% · 2023 87% · 2024 94% · 2025 85%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$2.2M
’17
−$6.1M
’18
$5.0M
’19
−$4.7M
’20
$3.1M
’21
$5.5M
’22
$38M
’23
$8.5M
’24
−$11M
’25
35
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

John Scatizzi

Executive director

Board chair

Dan Cobb

Chair

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed161517151515151614
Joined·+4+2+1+3+4+3+4+0
No longer listed·50334332
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2018: the base held at 1 funder, grant income held at $30k.

Funder
'17
'18
total
funders
1
1

From the IRS filings of MISSOURI TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

MISSOURI TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION draws 100% of its grant income from funders outside Missouri, across 1 state in all.

CA

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
Missouri out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Organizations like MISSOURI TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Missouri

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

77% of spending goes to programs.

Program 77%Management 23%Fundraising 0%

Governance

14
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

76%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for MISSOURI TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds MISSOURI TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION?
MISSOURI TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION (Missouri) receives grants from 1 organization whose IRS filings report $60,000 to it, the largest being ANITA BORG INSTITUTE FOR TECHNOLOGY ($60,000). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does MISSOURI TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION have?
IRS filings report 1 organization giving $60,000 in grants to MISSOURI TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, 1 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of MISSOURI TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION?
ANITA BORG INSTITUTE FOR TECHNOLOGY is the largest funder on record, with $60,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like MISSOURI TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Missouri. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 1 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing