Skip to content
Anita Borg Institute for Technology at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Anita Borg Institute for Technology

Our mission is to get our community in tech skilled, hired, promoted, paid, and funded, so they can thrive, lead, and drive innovation for a more impartial and sustainable future.

$248k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$2.6MCommunity Improvement$260kYouth Development$252kHealth$200kCivil Rights$150kRecreation & Sports$100kEnvironment$75kScience & Tech$62kOther$0
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 2 grants below total $75,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $248,400 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $173,400 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$50,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$24M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PRAIRIE PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL LLC$50,000
WOMEN WHO CODE$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 65% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY: $30k → 10%UC REGENTS - UCLA: $120k → 10%HARVEY MUDD COLLEGE: $40k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER: $30k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS: $30k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA: $30k → 16%ZEBRA COALITION: $200k → 13%CURATORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI: $30k → 16%BOARD OF REGENTS FOR THE UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SYSTEM: $30k → 10%JOSEPH BUSINESS SCHOOL DBA RISE: $45k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS FOUNDATION: $30k → 19%NEW JERSEY INSTITUTE OF TECH DEPT OF COMPUTER SCIENCE: $30k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT AND STATE AGRICULTURAL COLLEGE: $30k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK: $30k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND FOUNDATION INC: $30k → 11%DIGITAL HARBOR FOUNDATION: $130k → 19%VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY: $30k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE FOUNDATION: $30k → 10%US REGENTS - UCLA: $100k → 10%HARVEY MUDD COLLEGE: $40k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER: $30k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS: $30k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA: $30k → 16%CURATORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI: $30k → 16%BOARD OF REGENTS FOR THE UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SYSTEM: $30k → 10%JOSEPH BUSINESS SCHOOL: $40k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS FOUNDATION: $30k → 19%NEW JERSEY INSTITUTE OF TECH (NJIT) DEPT OF COMPUTER SCIENCE: $30k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT DEPT OF COMPUTER SCIENCE: $30k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK: $30k → 11%DIGITAL HARBOR FOUNDATION: $105k → 19%VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY: $30k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE FOUNDATION: $30k → 10%UC REGENTS - UCLA: $70k → 10%HARVEY MUDD COLLEGE: $40k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER: $30k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS: $30k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $30k → 16%NEW VENTURE FUND: $75k → 14%BOARD OF REGENTS FOR THE UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SYSTEM: $30k → 10%JOSEPH BUSINESS SCHOOL: $40k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS FOUNDATION: $30k → 19%NEW JERSEY INSTITUTE OF TECH (NJIT): $30k → 16%DIGITAL HARBOR FOUNDATION: $50k → 19%UC REGENTS - UCLA: $70k → 10%DIGITAL HARBOR FOUNDATION: $34k → 19%DIGITAL HARBOR FOUNDATION: $34k → 19%DIGITAL HARBOR FOUNDATION: $32k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
ND
MN
IL
WI
NY
PA
NJ
CA
CO
NE
MO
MD
AZ
NC
SC
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.0M · 25 repeat orgs$782k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +60% since the first grant, against +26% for those funded once.

25 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2024, 25 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
22

Total granted

$3.0M
$707k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+60%
+26%

Still filing today

72%
68%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $75k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationYouth DevelopmentScience & TechCivil RightsRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DH
    DIGITAL HARBOR FOUNDATION
    3× · 2019–2021 · $435k · revenue ×42
  • TJ
    THE JOSEPH CENTER
    4× · 2019–2022 · $140k · revenue +51%
  • VU
    VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2017–2020 · $120k · revenue +50%

Funded once

  • ZY
    ZEBRA YOUTH INC
    one grant, 2022 · $200k · revenue -40%
  • FA
    FLORIDA ACCESS NETWORKgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $200k · revenue +141% · 29% of their budget
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT AND STATE AGRICULTURAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $30k · revenue +35%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Virginia Investment Management Company

The university of virginia investment management company (uvimco) is organized to invest funds on behalf of the rector and visitors of the university of virginia (the university or uva) and university-associated organizations (uaos).

Education
2
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
3
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
4
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
5
University of Virginia Foundation

To provide administrative services to university of virginia (university) entities, university associated organizations, or other entities involved in activities which support the university. to engage in matters pertaining to real…

Education
6
The University of TexasTexas a&M Investment Management Company

To generate superior long-term investment returns to support The University of Texas and Texas A&M University systems as they provide world-class teaching, push the boundaries of discovery, and achieve excellence in patient healthcare for…

Education
7
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
8
University of Maryland Physicians Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

—
9
University of Maryland Oncology Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
10
University of Maryland Eye Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
11
University of Maryland Neurosurgeryassociates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Education
12
University of Maryland Obstetrical Andgynecological Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Maryland College Park Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Metropolitan Washington Dc Chapter of NCBW100. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

37 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 37 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
36/37
Grantees still filing
25/37
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DIGITAL HARBOR FOUNDATION: $435,000 · EducationDIGITAL HARBOR FOUNDATIONUniversity of South Carolina Educational Foundation: $120,000 · EducationUniversity of South Carolina Educational FoundationVILLANOVA UNIVERSITY: $120,000 · EducationVILLANOVA UNIVERSITYUniversity of Illinois Foundation: $120,000 · EducationUniversity of Illinois FoundationUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION: $120,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATIONHarvey Mudd College: $120,000 · EducationHarvey Mudd CollegeFOUNDATION AT NJ INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $120,000 · EducationFOUNDATION AT NJ INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGYUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK FOUNDATION INC: $120,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK FOUNDATION INCUNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER: $120,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTERUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE FOUNDATION: $112,970 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE FOUNDATIONARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY: $70,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE FOUNDATION INC: $60,000 · Education+6 more: $153,702 · Education+6 moreREGENTS UNIV OF CALIFORNIA: $360,000 · OtherREGENTS UNIV OF CALIFORNIATHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INC: $120,000 · OtherTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION I…UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN: $116,288 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSINUNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS: $90,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXASUNIVERSITY OF VERMONT AND STATE AGRICULTURAL COLLEGE: $90,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF VERMONT AND STATE AGRI…ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY: $60,000 · OtherMISSOURI TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION: $60,000 · OtherCURATORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI: $60,000 · OtherPRAIRIE PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL LLC: $50,000 · Other+14 more: $215,349 · Other+14 moreFLORIDA ACCESS NETWORK: $200,000 · EnvironmentNEW VENTURE FUND: $75,000 · EnvironmentZEBRA YOUTH INC: $200,000 · Youth DevelopmentNATIONAL CENTER FOR WOMEN AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY: $20,000 · Youth DevelopmentCenter for Black Innovation Inc: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE JOSEPH CENTER: $140,000 · Recreation & SportsEQUALITY FLORIDA INSTITUTE INC: $125,000 · Civil RightsMetropolitan Washington DC Chapter of NCBW100: $5,000 · Civil RightsASSOCIATION FOR COMPUTING MACHINERY INC: $37,950 · Science & TechSOFTWARE FREEDOM CONSERVANCY INC: $19,500 · Science & Tech
Education$1,791,672Other$1,221,637Environment$275,000Youth Development$230,000Recreation & Sports$140,000Civil Rights$130,000Science & Tech$57,450

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDIGITAL HARBOR FOUNDATION: $435,000 over 3y, 11% of budgetZEBRA YOUTH INC: $200,000 over 1y, 8.0% of budgetFLORIDA ACCESS NETWORK: $200,000 over 1y, 29% of budgetTHE JOSEPH CENTER: $140,000 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetEQUALITY FLORIDA INSTITUTE INC: $125,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetUniversity of South Carolina Educational Foundation: $120,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetVILLANOVA UNIVERSITY: $120,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Illinois Foundation: $120,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INC: $120,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION: $120,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHarvey Mudd College: $120,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER: $120,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE FOUNDATION: $112,970 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNEW VENTURE FUND: $75,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY: $70,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE FOUNDATION INC: $60,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMISSOURI TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION: $60,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND FOUNDATION INC: $56,202 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetASSOCIATION FOR COMPUTING MACHINERY INC: $37,950 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF VERMONT AND STATE AGRICULTURAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL CENTER FOR WOMEN AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY: $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAMIE INC: $20,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetThurgood Marshall College Fund: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPARTNERSHIP FOR PUBLIC SERVICE INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BAIL PROJECT INC: $10,419 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCenter for Black Innovation Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetMILLS COLLEGE: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHICAGO TECH ACADEMY: $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCMD-IT INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ford FoundationTides FoundationSilicon Valley Commun…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…Morgan Stanley Global…Vanguard Charitable E…American Online Givin…Paypal Charitable Giv…The Bank of America C…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
The Ford FoundationNY11.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ford Foundation · Tides Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Anita Borg Institute for Technology funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Anita Borg Institute for Technology. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • University of Maryland Baltimore Foundation Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Amie Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Digital Harbor Foundation: 2% of income from government
  • University of Maryland Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 51 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Anita Borg Institute for Technology’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home