Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Angela & Scott Jaggar Foundation In

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$79k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Human Services$332kArts & Culture$321kYouth Development$156kEnvironment$94kHealth$74kEducation$33kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $29k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $50k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ROAD FORWARD SCHOLARSHIP FUND$15,000
HERSTORY WRITERS WORSHIP$15,000
I TRI GIRLS PROGRAM$10,000
LANDMARK ON MAIN STREET$10,000
RESIDENTS FOR A MORE BEAUT PORT WAS$7,500
SOUTHAMPTON FRESH AIR HOME$7,500
GRACE PLACE FOR CHILDREN$7,500
PORT WASHINGTON YOUTH COUNCIL$6,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $140k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 5% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%BELMONT CHILD CARE ASSOCIATION INC: $8k → 6%GRACE PLACE FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC: $8k → 10%PORT WASHINGTON CHILDREN'S CENTER: $8k → 6%PORT WASHINGTON CHILDREN'S CENTER: $8k → 6%PORT WASHINGTON CHILDREN'S CENTER: $8k → 6%PORT WASHINGTON CHILDREN'S CENTER: $8k → 6%PORT WASHINGTON CHILDREN'S CENTER: $8k → 6%PORT WASHINGTON CHILDREN'S CENTER: $8k → 6%PORT WASHINGTON CHILDREN'S CENTER: $8k → 6%PORT WASHINGTON CHILDREN'S CENTER: $7k → 6%FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S ASSOC: $14k → 6%FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S ASSOC: $10k → 6%FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S ASSOC: $10k → 6%FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S ASSOC: $9k → 6%FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S ASSOC: $8k → 6%FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S ASSOCIATION: $8k → 6%FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S ASSOC: $8k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$988k · 17 repeat orgs$23k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
3

Total granted

$988k
$23k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+55%

Still filing today

71%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesEnvironmentHealthYouth DevelopmentEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TD
    THEATRE DEVELOPMENT FUND INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $82k · revenue +21%
  • HW
    HERSTORY WRITERS NETWORK INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $82k · revenue +131%
  • UC
    USDAN CENTER FOR THE CREATIVE AND PERFORMING ARTS
    8× · 2017–2024 · $82k · revenue +13%

Funded once

  • FA
    FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S ASS
    one grant, 2018 · $8k
  • GP
    GRACE PLACE FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $8k · revenue +47%
  • BC
    Belmont Child Care Association Incgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $8k · revenue +55%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Washington Park Citizens Association Inc

The washington park citizens association, inc. (the organization) is a nonprofit organization incorporated in the state of rhode island in 1969. the organization operates washington park community center, which provides childcare programs…

Human Services
2
Park Slope Child Care Collective Inc

To provide day care to a diverse community in a loving, caring and supportive educational environment focused on the socio-emotional development of children ages 2 - 5.

3
Port Townsend School of the Arts Dba Northwind Art

Northwind art offers people of all ages and skill levels opportunities to learn collaboratively with artists of exceptional talent, enthusiasm, and vision through classes, workshops, other programs, and through experiencing quality…

Arts & Culture
4
Greater Port Washington Business Improvement District Association

The organization is a district management association established pursuant to General Municipal Law Sect. 980-M to carry out the activities of the business improvement district established by the Town of North Hempstead. The purpose of the…

Community Improvement
5
Harbor Day Care Center Inc

The organization provides childcare services to children age 12 weeks to 12 years through infant/toddler, pre-k, before and after school, and summer camp programs.

6
Concord Children's Center Inc

To cultivate an intimate, welcoming community where children develop respectful relationships and inquisitive minds, build confidence in their individual gifts, and are engaged, prepared and inspired to learn.

Human Services
7
Mid-Island Y Jewish Community Center in

Provide vital services & foster jewish identity, personal growth, family strength and community. the mid-island y jcc is open to everyone in the community serving individuals of all ages, abilities, and challenges.

Human Services
8
Portsmouth Reads
Education
9
Peconic Public Broadcasting

Peconic Public Broadcasting is a public FM radio station located in Southampton, New York. The station services Long Island and coastal Connecticut and offers listeners both national and local programs.

10
Port Washington Library Foundation Inc

It is the mission of the organization to raise funds to support the needs of the port washington public library not covered by taxes and to maintain its viability for future generations. our vision is to provide full and sustainable…

Education
11
The Childrens Workshop

Preschool education

12
Peace Islands Institute New York Inc
Religion

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Southampton Fresh Air Home and the most unlike its peers is Herstory Writers Network Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
12/14
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

GRACE PLACE FOR CHILDREN — $66,500 · OtherGRACE PLACE FOR CHILDRENPORT WASHINGTON PARENT RESOURCE CTR — $66,500 · OtherPORT WASHINGTON PARENT RESOURCE CTRBELMONT CHILD CARE ASSOCI — $59,000 · OtherBELMONT CHILD CARE ASSOCIPORT WASHINGTON YOUTH COUNCIL INC — $58,000 · OtherPORT WASHINGTON YOUTH COUNCIL INCGRENVILLE BAKER BOYS & GIRLS ASSOC — $51,500 · OtherGRENVILLE BAKER BOYS & GIRLS ASSOCI TRI GIRLS PROGRAM — $31,000 · OtherI TRI GIRLS PROGRAM+2 more — $9,500 · OtherTHEATRE DEVELOPMENT FUND INC — $81,500 · Arts & CultureTHEATRE DEVELOPMENT FUND INCHERSTORY WRITERS NETWORK INC — $81,500 · Arts & CultureHERSTORY WRITERS NETWORK INCUSDAN CENTER FOR THE CREATIVE AND PERFORMING ARTS — $81,500 · Arts & CultureUSDAN CENTER FOR THE CREATIVE AND PE…LANDMARK ON MAIN STREET INC — $76,500 · Arts & CultureLANDMARK ON MAIN STREET INCFAMILY AND CHILDREN'S ASSOCIATION INC — $65,500 · Human ServicesFAMILY AND CHIL…PORT WASHINGTON CHILDREN'S CENTER — $59,000 · Human ServicesPORT WASHINGTON…GRACE PLACE FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC — $7,500 · Human ServicesGRACE PLACE FOR…Belmont Child Care Association Inc — $7,500 · Human ServicesBelmont Child C…RESIDENTS FOR A MORE BEAUTIFUL PORT WASHINGTON INC — $94,000 · EnvironmentRESIDENTS …THE SOUTHAMPTON FRESH AIR HOME — $74,000 · HealthROAD FORWARD SCHOLARSHIP FUND — $25,000 · EducationGRENVILLE BAKER BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB INC — $15,000 · Youth Development
Other$342,000Arts & Culture$321,000Human Services$139,500Environment$94,000Health$74,000Education$25,000Youth Development$15,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetRESIDENTS FOR A MORE BEAUTIFUL PORT WASHINGTON INC — $94,000 over 9y, 13% of budgetTHEATRE DEVELOPMENT FUND INC — $81,500 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetHERSTORY WRITERS NETWORK INC — $81,500 over 9y, 4.1% of budgetUSDAN CENTER FOR THE CREATIVE AND PERFORMING ARTS — $81,500 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetLANDMARK ON MAIN STREET INC — $76,500 over 9y, 1.5% of budgetTHE SOUTHAMPTON FRESH AIR HOME — $74,000 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetPORT WASHINGTON PARENT RESOURCE CTR — $66,500 over 8y, 6.7% of budgetFAMILY AND CHILDREN'S ASSOCIATION INC — $65,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetPORT WASHINGTON CHILDREN'S CENTER — $59,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetPORT WASHINGTON YOUTH COUNCIL INC — $58,000 over 9y, 13% of budgetROAD FORWARD SCHOLARSHIP FUND — $25,000 over 2y, 5.4% of budgetGRENVILLE BAKER BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB INC — $15,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetGRACE PLACE FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC — $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBelmont Child Care Association Inc — $7,500 over 1y, 0.8% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds RESIDENTS FOR A MORE BEAUTIFUL PORT WASHINGTON INC
  • Who funds THEATRE DEVELOPMENT FUND INC
  • Who funds HERSTORY WRITERS NETWORK INC
  • Who funds USDAN CENTER FOR THE CREATIVE AND PERFORMING ARTS
  • Who funds LANDMARK ON MAIN STREET INC
  • Who funds THE SOUTHAMPTON FRESH AIR HOME
  • Who funds PORT WASHINGTON PARENT RESOURCE CTR
  • Who funds FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds PORT WASHINGTON CHILDREN'S CENTER
  • Who funds PORT WASHINGTON YOUTH COUNCIL INC
  • Who funds ROAD FORWARD SCHOLARSHIP FUND
  • Who funds GRENVILLE BAKER BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB INC
  • Who funds GRACE PLACE FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC
  • Who funds Belmont Child Care Association Inc

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Jane & Martin Schwartz Family FoundationNY13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Jane & Martin Schwartz Family Foundation · Peter & Jeri Dejana Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · The New York Community Trust · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Angela & Scott Jaggar Foundation In funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Angela & Scott Jaggar Foundation In?

    Find your warmest path to Angela & Scott Jaggar Foundation In through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph