Skip to content

New York · Nonprofit

RESIDENTS FOR A MORE BEAUTIFUL PORT WASHINGTON INC

RESIDENTS FOR A MORE BEAUTIFUL PORT WASHINGTON INC (New York) receives grants from 10 organizations whose IRS filings report $113,982 to it, the largest being ANGELA & SCOTT JAGGAR FOUNDATION IN ($94,000). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$172k
Funders on record
10
Grants received
$114k
Net assets
$234k
3/10 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 14%
01What it does

What Residents for a More Beautiful Port Washington Inc does

Mission

Residents for a more beautiful port washington, founded in 1968, is a membershiporganization dedicated to sustainable growth by protecting the environment, enhancing the quality of life and increasing environmental awareness on the entire port washington peninsula.our mission is to inspire and unify the residents of port washington to protect andadvance the vibrancy, resiliency, sustainability and beauty of our peninsula. We aimto do this in 3 key ares:beautification - we live in an extraordinarily beautiful town situated on the water.our goal is to keep boosting the beauty and vibrancy of our town by continuallyimproving our public spaces, making them more visually attractive, cleaner, and moreusable. We do this via a series of programs, including give a litter bit, clean green main street, the port washington mural project and port washington blooms.education - residents is committed to reaching the youngest of our community membersvia the port washington schools, helping to deepen t

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Beautification program - plan, plant and maintain neighborhood parks. Advocacy forexpansion of walking trails creating better linkages throughout port washington.spearheading, in conjunction with town of north hempstead, business improvementdistrict, chamber of commerce, long island railroad and the garbage district, thecreation of the clean green zone on upper main street aimed at beautifying upper main street, and educating shop keepers and the general public to keep this shopping area "clean and green".

    $59,040 spent
    40% of program spending
  2. Environmental protection and advocacy program - quality of life issues and protection of same regarding the population growth on the port washington peninsula.residents leads programs in the port washington school district providing all of the students with the knowledge, skills and attitudes that will lead to a more sustainable future. Programs foster a deep appreciation of nature as well as an understanding of the role humans play in the degredation of our precious and fragile ecosystems.

    $47,941 spent
    32% of program spending
  3. Public education - provide the knowledge, skills and attitudes that will lead to amore sustainable future. Making the people of the local communities aware of theimpact of population and commercial growth through newsletters, advertisements andpublic forums and community events.

    $40,683 spent
    28% of program spending

The 3 programs described on its FY2025 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $147,664.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($209k) Expenses 100 ($220k) Net assets 100 ($274k)2018 Revenue 137 ($285k) Expenses 109 ($240k) Net assets 116 ($319k)2020 Revenue 80 ($167k) Expenses 76 ($168k) Net assets 121 ($331k)2021 Revenue 86 ($179k) Expenses 100 ($219k) Net assets 106 ($291k)2022 Revenue 77 ($160k) Expenses 86 ($189k) Net assets 95 ($261k)2023 Revenue 87 ($181k) Expenses 97 ($214k) Net assets 84 ($229k)2024 Revenue 78 ($163k) Expenses 67 ($148k) Net assets 89 ($244k)2025 Revenue 82 ($172k) Expenses 83 ($182k) Net assets 86 ($234k)
'17'18'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (82)Expenses (83)Net assets (86)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2020 to 2021, from $351k to $293k (−17%).

$275k
$320k
$351k
$293k
$277k
$247k
$248k
$236k
'17'18'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2018 2% · 2020 1% · 2021 35% · 2022 3% · 2023 9% · 2024 5%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

67% of RESIDENTS FOR A MORE BEAUTIFUL PORT WASHINGTON INC’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (88% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 4,629 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 6 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

−$11k
’17
$45k
’18
−$812
’20
−$40k
’21
−$29k
’22
−$32k
’23
$15k
’24
−$10k
’25
15
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Patrica Class

Executive director

Board chair

Curt Trinko

Chairman

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

'17'18'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed2726171418142019
Joined·+1·+0+8+2+8+1
No longer listed·2·34622
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base held at 3 funders, grant income fell $20k → $13k.

1 of 10 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 0% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of RESIDENTS FOR A MORE BEAUTIFUL PORT WASHINGTON INC’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

RESIDENTS FOR A MORE BEAUTIFUL PORT WASHINGTON INC leans on a few funders — its largest provides 82% of grant income and the top three 94%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

82%
largest funder
94%
top three
~1
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 49% · 2018 85% · 2019 89% · 2020 95% · 2021 96% · 2022 99% · 2023 59% — growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

38% of RESIDENTS FOR A MORE BEAUTIFUL PORT WASHINGTON INC's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 30% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

95% of RESIDENTS FOR A MORE BEAUTIFUL PORT WASHINGTON INC's grant income comes from New York funders.

NY
CT
NC

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
New York out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $89 arriving through sponsors registered in 1 state is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

RESIDENTS FOR A MORE BEAUTIFUL PORT WASHINGTON INC is better cushioned than half of the 2,433 environment nonprofits its size.

Operating margin−6% · bottom quartile
Months of reserve15.4mo · above the median
Revenue growth (annualized)−2% · bottom quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 2,433 environment nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025

Organizations like RESIDENTS FOR A MORE BEAUTIFUL PORT WASHINGTON INC

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In New York

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

81% of spending goes to programs.

Program 81%Management 7%Fundraising 11%

Governance

18
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

96%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

NY

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for RESIDENTS FOR A MORE BEAUTIFUL PORT WASHINGTON INC: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds RESIDENTS FOR A MORE BEAUTIFUL PORT WASHINGTON INC?
RESIDENTS FOR A MORE BEAUTIFUL PORT WASHINGTON INC (New York) receives grants from 10 organizations whose IRS filings report $113,982 to it, the largest being ANGELA & SCOTT JAGGAR FOUNDATION IN ($94,000). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does RESIDENTS FOR A MORE BEAUTIFUL PORT WASHINGTON INC have?
IRS filings report 10 organizations giving $113,982 in grants to RESIDENTS FOR A MORE BEAUTIFUL PORT WASHINGTON INC, 3 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of RESIDENTS FOR A MORE BEAUTIFUL PORT WASHINGTON INC?
ANGELA & SCOTT JAGGAR FOUNDATION IN is the largest funder on record, with $94,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like RESIDENTS FOR A MORE BEAUTIFUL PORT WASHINGTON INC find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in New York. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Residents for a More Beautiful Port Washington →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 10 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing