Skip to content
Andreas Family Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Andreas Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$675k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$291k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$3.0MHealth$2.1MEducation$465kPublic Safety & Disaster$145kScience & Tech$100kSocial Science$80kPhilanthropy$77kFood & Nutrition$15kOther$0
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $60k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $51k
  • $250k+2 grants · $549k
$25,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$6.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE JOHN F KENNEDY CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS$291,289
WOLF TRAP FOUNDATION$257,500
FLINT HILL FUND$51,000
NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC SOCIETY$25,000
HEROES INC$25,000
KENNEDY KRIEGER INSTITUTE FOUNDATION$10,000
THE KATHERINE THOMAS SCHOOL$5,000
GEORGE W BUSH PRESIDENTIAL CENTER$5,000
POTOMAC CONSERVANCY$2,500
BLUE RIDGE AREA FOOD BANK$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%FACETS: $5k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
OH
KY
VA
MD
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

65%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.9M · 16 repeat orgs$2.1M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +27% since the first grant, against +8% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
16

Total granted

$3.9M
$2.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+8%

Still filing today

75%
69%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEducationHealthHuman ServicesInternationalCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JF
    JOHN F KENNEDY CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS
    8× · 2017–2024 · $2.6M · revenue +115%
  • TL
    THE LANGLEY SCHOOL INC
    4× · 2018–2023 · $410k · revenue +27%
  • WT
    WOLF TRAP FOUNDATION FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS
    4× · 2021–2024 · $367k · revenue +68%

Funded once

  • SM
    SIBLEY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $2.0M · revenue -8%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $50k
  • MP
    MCLEAN PROJECT FOR THE ARTSgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $20k · revenue +415%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
2
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
3
Washington Performing Arts Society

Washington performing arts champions the arts as a unifying force. through collaborations with artists, educators, community leaders, and institutional partners, we bring wide-ranging artistic programs to stages, schools, and neighborhoods…

Arts & Culture
4
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
5
Museum of Arts and Design

To collect, display and interpret objects in craft art and design.

Arts & Culture
6
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
7
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

—
8
United States Telecom Association

See schedule oustelecom exists to ensure members can compete, grow and thrive to build a world where families, enterprises and communities are connected through the power of broadband.our member companies have committed a considerable…

—
9
United States Olympic and Paralympic Committee

Empowering the competitive excellence and well-being of team usa athletes, championing the power of sport, and inspiring the nation.

Recreation & Sports
10
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
11
New York School of Interior Design

New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…

Education
12
Internet Society Foundation

At the internet society foundation, we focus on funding initiatives that strengthen the internet in function and reach so that it can effectively serve all people. our work advances the vision of the internet society (isoc): the internet…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wolf Trap Foundation for the Performing Arts; the most unlike its peers is National Geographic Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
15/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JOHN F KENNEDY CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS: $2,576,662 · Arts & CultureJOHN F KENNEDY CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTSWOLF TRAP FOUNDATION FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS: $366,520 · Arts & CultureWOLF TRAP FOUNDATION FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS+5 more: $68,548 · Arts & CultureSIBLEY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $2,000,000 · HealthSIBLEY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONINOVA HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION: $74,619 · Health+1 more: $7,500 · HealthTHE LANGLEY SCHOOL INC: $410,000 · EducationTHE LANGLE…NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC SOCIETY: $100,000 · EducationNATIONAL G…The Potomac School: $30,000 · EducationThe Potoma…+2 more: $20,000 · EducationKENNEDY KRIEGER INSTITUTE FOUNDATION: $80,000 · OtherFLINT HILL FUND: $76,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $50,000 · OtherDAV: $20,000 · OtherBLUE RIDGE AREA FOOD BANK INC: $14,500 · Other+7 more: $17,000 · OtherHEROES Inc: $145,000 · Crime & LegalFACETS CARES INC: $4,500 · Human ServicesTHE SAFE CHILDREN FOUNDATION: $2,500 · Human ServicesMERIDIAN INTERNATIONAL CENTER: $4,400 · InternationalSISTER OF MARY BOYSTOWN AND GIRLSTOWN INC: $250 · InternationalTHE POTOMAC CONSERVANCY INC: $4,000 · Environment
Arts & Culture$3,011,730Health$2,082,119Education$560,000Other$257,500Crime & Legal$145,000Human Services$7,000International$4,650Environment$4,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJOHN F KENNEDY CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS: $2,576,662 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetSIBLEY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $2,000,000 over 1y, 8.8% of budgetTHE LANGLEY SCHOOL INC: $410,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetWOLF TRAP FOUNDATION FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS: $366,520 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetHEROES Inc: $145,000 over 4y, 5.0% of budgetNATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC SOCIETY: $100,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetINOVA HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION: $74,619 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe Potomac School: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMuseum of Modern Art: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMCLEAN PROJECT FOR THE ARTS: $20,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION: $19,420 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GEORGE W BUSH FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBLUE RIDGE AREA FOOD BANK INC: $14,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION: $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WASHINGTON BALLET: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTeach for America Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFACETS CARES INC: $4,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMERIDIAN INTERNATIONAL CENTER: $4,400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON NATIONAL OPERA: $4,128 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTHE POTOMAC CONSERVANCY INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SAFE CHILDREN FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSOME INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ayco Charitable F…American Endowment Fo…National Philanthropi…Gs Donor Advised Phil…Vanguard Charitable E…Morgan Stanley Global…American Online Givin…The Bank of America C…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
The Ayco Charitable FoundationNY14× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ayco Charitable Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Andreas Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Andreas Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Andreas Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home