Skip to content

· Private foundation

And to the Ends of the Earth Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$59k
Granted FY2025still arriving
29
Grants FY2025still arriving
14
States reached
$27k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2025.

Religion$76kInternational$19kHuman Services$3kCivil Rights$1kFood & Nutrition$1kYouth Development$1kHealth$650Public Safety & Disaster$100Other$0
02FY2025 · 29 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k28 grants · $32k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $27k
$730
Median grant
14
States reached
$6k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$27,069
INTERNATIONAL FRIENDSHIP EVANGELISM$6,000
PIONEERS$5,000
TIME SQUARE CHURCH$2,300
GLOBAL CHRISTIAN RELIEF$2,268
DCCI MINISTRIES HATUN TASH$1,500
ONE FOR ISRAEL$1,300
CHILD FUND INTERNATIONAL$1,200
EXPLOITS MINISTRY$1,050
WEC INTERNATIONAL$1,000
IF GATHERING EVERYBODY EVERYWHERE$1,000
MISSION AVIATION FELLOWSHIP$1,000
IN TOUCH MINISTRIES$750
OUR DAILY BREAD$750
WORLD VISION$730
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $600) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $600 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
ID
WI
MI
NY
OR
PA
CA
CO
VA
TN
NC
OK
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$141k · 24 repeat orgs$17k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +13% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

24 repeat relationships: 22 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
19

Total granted

$141k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
0%

Still filing today

33%
16%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24’25
ReligionInternationalCivil RightsHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OD
    Open Doors With Brother Andrew Inc
    3× · 2023–2025 · $5k · revenue +42%
  • CI
    CHILDFUND INTERNATIONAL USA
    3× · 2023–2025 · $4k · revenue +8%
  • RM
    RBC MINISTRIES
    3× · 2023–2025 · $3k · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • PS
    PLANTING SEEDS IN AFRICA INC
    one grant, 2024 · $2k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $1k
  • LO
    LIGHT OF THE WORLD DANCE MINISTRY
    one grant, 2024 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
2
Biglife International Inc

Biglife international inc. empowers believers worldwide to reach and disciple their own people for jesus christ.

Recreation & Sports
3
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

—
4
Mission Without Borders International

The organization is dedicated to reaching people for christ through an international network of christians who journey with the poor and marginalized, bringing practical and spiritual support with hope of a better future,(continued on…

International
5
Jewish Voice Ministries Intl

To proclaim the gospel, grow the messianic jewish community and engage the church concerning israel and the jewish people. this is done through education, evangelism and being a movement leader, all with excellence in order to transform…

—
6
Youth for Christ International Ministries

As part of the body of Christ, to see that every young person in every people group in every nation has the opportunity to make an informed decision to be a follower of Jesus Christ and become a part of the local church.

Religion
7
Global Outreach International Inc

To get the good news to every nation this generation by showing and sharing god's love by providing opportunities and supporting christian missionaries in over fifty seven countries around the world.

International
8
Biblica Inc

To provide the bible in accurate, contemporary translations and formats so that more people around the world will have the opportunity to be transformed by jesus christ.

Religion
9
Walk Thru the Bible Ministries Inc

Walk thru the bible (wtb) ignites passion for god's word. by developing a global network of influential pastors and leaders and then resourcing them with tools and training, wtb fulfills its role in the great commission.

Religion
10
Global Media Outreach

Leveraging technology to invite all people to know jesus christ as savior and grow in a personal relationship with him.

Religion
11
International Commission Inc

Equipping and enabling believers worldwide to conduct church-based evangelism projects to reach unbelievers and make disciples.

Religion
12
Coral Ridge Ministries Media Inc

1) To proclaim the good news of the Gospel throughout the earth. 2) To teach and nurture His followers. 3) To equip and encourage believers to live out their faith. 4) To defend religious liberty by helping believers understand America's…

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Insight for Living; the most unlike its peers is The Mossy Foot Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 50 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/18
Grantees still filing
14/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $77,219 · OtherIndividual grant recipientINTERNATIONAL FRIENDSHIP EVANGELISM INC: $11,000 · OtherINTERNATIONAL FRIENDSHIP EVANGELISM INCTHE BROOKLYN TABERNACLE: $7,928 · OtherTHE BROOKLYN TABERNACLEWEC INTERNATIONAL: $6,672 · OtherPIONEERS: $5,000 · Other+29 more: $24,946 · Other+29 moreOpen Doors With Brother Andrew Inc: $5,268 · ReligionOpen Doors Wit…One For Israel: $3,250 · ReligionOne For IsraelRBC MINISTRIES: $2,850 · ReligionRBC MINISTRIESJesus Image Inc: $1,800 · ReligionJesus Image In…BIBLEPROJECT: $1,700 · ReligionBIBLEPROJECTIN TOUCH MINISTRIES INC: $1,400 · ReligionIN TOUCH MINIS…CHRIST FOR ALL NATIONS: $995 · ReligionAngel Christian Television Trust Inc: $918 · ReligionInterVarsity Christian FellowshipUSA: $825 · Religion+3 more: $762 · ReligionCHILDFUND INTERNATIONAL USA: $3,500 · InternationalWORLD VISION INC: $1,770 · InternationalLIVE ACTION: $1,350 · Civil RightsWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $600 · Human Services
Other$132,765Religion$19,768International$5,270Civil Rights$1,350Human Services$600

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHILDFUND INTERNATIONAL USA: $3,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOne For Israel: $3,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRBC MINISTRIES: $2,850 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD VISION INC: $1,770 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBIBLEPROJECT: $1,700 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLIVE ACTION: $1,350 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHRIST FOR ALL NATIONS: $995 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAngel Christian Television Trust Inc: $918 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Urban Alternative: $350 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $312 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetINSIGHT FOR LIVING: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Open Doors With Brother Andrew Inc ↗
  • Who funds CHILDFUND INTERNATIONAL USA ↗
  • Who funds One For Israel ↗
  • Who funds RBC MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds Jesus Image Inc ↗
  • Who funds WORLD VISION INC ↗
  • Who funds BIBLEPROJECT ↗
  • Who funds IN TOUCH MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds LIVE ACTION ↗
  • Who funds CHRIST FOR ALL NATIONS ↗
  • Who funds Angel Christian Television Trust Inc ↗
  • Who funds InterVarsity Christian FellowshipUSA ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MOSSY FOOT PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds TEEN CHALLENGE INC ↗
  • Who funds The Urban Alternative ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Servant FoundationKS14.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Servant Foundation · SuperChannel Worship Ministries Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · World Vision Inc · Christian Community Foundation Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization And to the Ends of the Earth Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from And to the Ends of the Earth Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to And to the Ends of the Earth Inc?

Find your warmest path to And to the Ends of the Earth Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 50 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on And to the Ends of the Earth’s filings →

More from the funding graph