· Community foundation
Anaheim Community Foundation
The mission of the ANAHEIM COMMUNITY FOUNDATION is to strengthen the city of anaheim through people, partnerships, and pride.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $7k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $193k
- $50k–250k8 grants · $738k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF ORANGE COUNTY AND THE INLAND EMPIRE INC | $207,500 |
| ANAHEIM PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION | $111,865 |
| GIRLS INC OF ORANGE COUNTY | $100,001 |
| JMH-ANAHEIM FOUNDATION INC | $78,500 |
| WESTERN YOUTH SERVICES | $72,917 |
| ANAHEIM FAMILY YMCA | $63,032 |
| ORANGE COUNTY HUMAN RELATIONS COUNCIL | $54,384 |
| GROWTH OPPORTUNITIES THROUGH ATHLETICS LEARNING & SERVICE (GOALS) | $50,001 |
| ORANGE COUNTY CONGREGATION COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION | $48,889 |
| WAYMAKERS | $48,143 |
| BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER ANAHEIM-CYPRESS | $42,665 |
| THE MUCKENHALER CULTURAL CENTER | $30,000 |
| MIND OC | $23,016 |
| ORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITY HOUSING CORP | $7,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $571k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 26% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +44% since the first grant, against +0% for the ones you funded once.
9 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 35% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $606k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- JFJMH-ANAHEIM FOUNDATION INC4× · 2021–2024 · $357k · revenue +101%
- TATHE ANAHEIM PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION A CALIF NON-PROFIT CORP3× · 2022–2024 · $260k · revenue +77% · 56% of their budget
- CACOMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF ORANGE COUNTY2× · 2021–2022 · $210k · revenue +15%
Funded once
- KCKINGDOM CAUSES INC CITY NET BEDROCK CREEKgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $152k · revenue +51%
- CHCOVENANT HOUSE CALIFORNIAgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $150k · revenue +38%
- IHINNOVATIVE HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES INCgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $53k · revenue +83%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To improve lives in orange county by delivering measurable long-term solutions to complex issues in education, financial stability, and housing. orange county united way (ocuw) is committed to breaking barriers and improving lives for…
Organizations mission is meeting the physical, relational, and emotional needs of orange county and the world through spiritual transformation.
Building long-term, life changing relationships with urban youth, equipping them to thrive and contribute to their community.
To support local control and promote good governance & policy making among orange county leaders.
To help people with developmental disabilities reach their highest potential and guide them through their special needs journey.
The mission of ceo leadership alliance orange county (claoc) is to develop and retain the talent needed for an inclusive, premier innovation hub.
Octane connects people and ideas with capital and resources to fuel technology growth in orange county. our members represent orange county technology executive leaders, entrepreneurs, investors, venture capitalists, academicians, and…
Empowering youth with the skills and strength to succeed.
Court Appointed Special Advocates of Orange County provides a powerful voice and a meaningful connection for children who have experienced abuse, neglect and abandoment.
Orange County Communities Organized for Responsible Development (OCCORD) is a community-based organization that brings together workers, families and community partners to organize and advocate for good jobs, strong neighborhoods and an…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Waymakers and the most unlike its peers is Pure Game. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 46 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds JMH-ANAHEIM FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF ANA ↗
- Who funds THE ANAHEIM PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION A CALIF NON-PROFIT CORP ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF ORANGE COUNTY ↗
- Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF ORANGE COUNTY AND THE INLAND EMPIRE INC ↗
- Who funds KINGDOM CAUSES INC CITY NET BEDROCK CREEK ↗
- Who funds COVENANT HOUSE CALIFORNIA ↗
- Who funds GIRLS INCORPORATED OF ORANGE COUNTY ↗
- Who funds ORANGE COUNTY CONGREGATION COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION ↗
- Who funds Western Youth Services ↗
- Who funds MUCKENTHALER CULTURAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WE ARE GROUNDSWELL ↗
- Who funds INNOVATIVE HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES INC ↗
- Who funds GROWTH OPPORTUNITIES THROUGH ATHLETICS LEARNING AND SERVICE - GOALS ↗
- Who funds RYTMO ↗
- Who funds THE CHANCE THEATER ↗
- Who funds WAYMAKERS ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER ANAHEIM-CYPRESS ↗
- Who funds ONEOC ↗
- Who funds LATINO HEALTH ACCESS ↗
- Who funds Pure Game ↗
- Who funds CIELO COMMUNITY FOR INNOVATION ENTREPRENEURSHIP LEADERSHIP ↗
- Who funds MIND OC ↗
- Who funds ORANGE COUNTY ADULT ACHIEVEMENT CENTER DBA MY DAY COUNTS ↗
- Who funds KABOOM INC ↗
- Who funds RENEWABLE FARMS ↗
- Who funds ALZHEIMER'S ORANGE COUNTY ↗
- Who funds ORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITY HOUSING CORP ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Orange County Community Foundation · Anaheim Ducks Foundation · Orange County's United Way · Samueli Foundation · Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian · O L Halsell Foundation · Sisters of St Joseph Healthcare Foundation · California Community Foundation · St Jude Hospital · St Joseph Health System Foundation · Charitable Ventures of Orange County · Oneoc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Anaheim Community Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.