Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Amy and Chip Pearson Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$493k
Granted FY2024still arriving
27
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$191k
Largest
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182024.

Education$678kCommunity Improvement$482kHuman Services$425kFood & Nutrition$215kHealth$205kYouth Development$140kArts & Culture$116kEnvironment$88kOther$0
02FY2024 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k18 grants · $79k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $123k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $291k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$7.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST PAUL ACADEMY AND SUMMIT SCHOOL$191,000
NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE$100,000
MILKWEED EDITIONS$33,000
NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT CENTER$25,000
SECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND$20,000
MILL CITY FARMERS MARKET$15,000
KEYSTONE COMMUNITY SERVICES$10,000
NORTHERN STAR SCOUTING$10,000
MAC ADMINS FOUNDATION$10,000
HOPE DENTAL$5,000
THE COOKIE CART$5,000
NEW VISION FOUNDATION$5,000
BREAK THROUGH TWIN CITIES$5,000
FRIENDS OF THE MISSISSIPPI RIVER$5,000
THE FAMILY PARTNERSHIP$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $200k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%PREPARE & PROSPER: $5k → 14%PREPARE PROSPER: $5k → 14%PREPARE PROSPER: $5k → 14%THE FAMILY PARTNERSHIP: $5k → 11%THE FAMILY PARTNERSHIP: $5k → 11%THE FAMILY PARTNERSHIP: $5k → 11%THE FAMILY PARTNERSHIP: $5k → 11%THE FAMILY PARTNERSHIP: $5k → 11%NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $60k → 14%NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $25k → 14%NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $25k → 14%NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $25k → 14%NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $25k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 43% of Amy and Chip Pearson Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 95% of the giving stays in MN; read by stated purpose it is 55% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Amy and Chip Pearson Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.2M · 36 repeat orgs$268k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +37% since the first grant, against +22% for the ones you funded once.

36 repeat relationships — 26 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

36
23

Total granted

$2.2M
$263k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+22%

Still filing today

83%
30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Community ImprovementArts & CultureEducationRecreation & SportsYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ST PAUL ACADEMY AND SUMMIT SCHOOL
    7× · 2018–2024 · $614k · revenue +48%
  • NH
    NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE
    7× · 2018–2024 · $295k · revenue +97%
  • SH
    SECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND
    4× · 2021–2024 · $80k · revenue +39%

Funded once

  • BG
    BETA GROUP
    one grant, 2018 · $55k · revenue +22%
  • SH
    SECOND HARVEST
    one grant, 2020 · $40k
  • LS
    Lake Street Council
    one grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue -85%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Minnesota Council on Foundations

MCF is a vibrant philanthropic community connecting, strengthening and mobilizing the power of philanthropy to advance prosperity and equity.

2
Minnesota Chamber of Commerce and Industry

The minnesota chamber of commerce proactively leads the business community statewide to: advance pro-business, responsible minnesota public policy that creates jobs and grows the econony; provde member services to address evolving business…

3
Minneapolis Regional Chamber of Commerce

Creating powerful advocacy to enhance economic vitality in the minneapolis-st. paul region.

4
Minnesota Business Partnership

The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…

5
African Development Center

Grow businesses, build wealth and increase reinvestement in the african communities of minnesota

Human Services
6
Minnesota Council of Nonprofits Inc

The Minnesota Council of Nonprofits informs, promotes, connects and strengthens individual nonprofits and the nonprofit sector.

Philanthropy
7
Minneapolis Downtown Council

To create an extraordinary downtown minneapolis, applying the core values of leadership, collaboration, advocacy and innovation.

8
Mn Community Measurement

Mn community measurement empowers stakeholders with meaningful information to drive improvement.

Health
9
Arts Midwest Incorporated

Arts Midwest works collaboratively with private and public arts supporters to support, inform, and celebrate arts organizations and creative communities across the Midwest. Our mission is to build unprecedented opportunity across the…

Arts & Culture
10
Youthprise

Youthprise is a nonprofit intermediary that invests in the future of Minnesota by investing in youth. Youthprise's mission is to increase equity with and for Minnesota's indigenous, low-income, and racially diverse youth.

Education
11
St Paul Transportation Management Organization

Move minnesota leads the movement for an equitable and sustainable transportation system that puts people first. we are passionate about connecting communities, ending the climate crisis, expanding access to jobs and resources, and…

Environment
12
Minnesota Medical Association

To be the leading voice of medicine to make minnesota the healthiest state and the best place to practice.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Horst Rechelbacher Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCharter and Independent Sch…Community Arts EducationSocial Justice Advocacy Org…Christian Ministry Organiza…Family Philanthropic Founda…Youth Sports LeaguesAffordable Housing Developm…Youth Development & Empower…Environmental Advocacy and …
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%3%<5yr14%8%5–10yr20%15%10–20yr19%28%20–35yr15%23%35–55yr13%23%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%1%<5yr14%5%5–10yr20%7%10–20yr19%20%20–35yr15%14%35–55yr13%52%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/42
the rest of the field
14%
1,904/13,223

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

39 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 39 of the 62 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
39/39
Grantees still filing
25/39
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

BETAMN — $175,000 · OtherBETAMNKeystone Community Services — $50,000 · OtherKeystone Community ServicesNORTHERN STAR COUNCIL — $45,000 · OtherNORTHERN STAR COUNCILMILL CITY FARMERS MARKET INC — $45,000 · OtherMILL CITY FARMERS MARKET INCSECOND HARVEST — $40,000 · OtherLUNAR INC — $30,000 · OtherHOPE DENTAL CLINIC — $30,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF THE MISSISSIPPI RIVER — $35,000 · OtherNew Vision Foundation — $35,000 · OtherAT HOME GROUP — $35,000 · Other+31 more — $311,000 · Other+31 moreST PAUL ACADEMY AND SUMMIT SCHOOL — $613,666 · EducationST PAUL ACADEMY AND SUMMIT SC…+2 more — $35,000 · Education+2 moreNEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE — $295,000 · Community ImprovementNEIGHBORHOOD HOUSEGREENLIGHT FUND INC — $60,000 · Community ImprovementGREENLIGHT FUND INCBETA GROUP — $55,000 · Community ImprovementBETA GROUPWOMENVENTURE — $44,000 · Community ImprovementWOMENVENTURELake Street Council — $25,000 · Community ImprovementCREATIVE ENTERPRISE ZONE — $25,000 · Community ImprovementNEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC — $160,000 · Human ServicesNEIGHBORH…The Family Partnership — $25,000 · Human ServicesThe Famil…Prepare and Prosper — $15,000 · Human ServicesPrepare a…MILKWEED EDITIONS INC — $77,000 · Arts & CultureMILL CITY FARMERS MARKET CHARITABLE FUND — $45,000 · Arts & CultureTHE BAKKEN — $14,000 · Arts & CultureMINNESOTA CENTER FOR BOOK ARTS — $10,000 · Arts & CultureThe Cookie Cart — $50,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE SANNEH FOUNDATION — $35,000 · Youth DevelopmentJUXTAPOSITION ARTS INC — $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentSECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND — $80,000 · Food & NutritionMATTER — $5,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$831,000Education$648,666Community Improvement$504,000Human Services$200,000Arts & Culture$146,000Youth Development$90,000Food & Nutrition$85,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetST PAUL ACADEMY AND SUMMIT SCHOOL — $613,666 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE — $295,000 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC — $160,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetSECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND — $80,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMILKWEED EDITIONS INC — $77,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetGREENLIGHT FUND INC — $60,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetBETA GROUP — $55,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetKeystone Community Services — $50,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetThe Cookie Cart — $50,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetNORTHERN STAR COUNCIL — $45,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMILL CITY FARMERS MARKET INC — $45,000 over 3y, 9.2% of budgetMILL CITY FARMERS MARKET CHARITABLE FUND — $45,000 over 4y, 5.6% of budgetWOMENVENTURE — $44,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE MISSISSIPPI RIVER — $35,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetNew Vision Foundation — $35,000 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetTHE SANNEH FOUNDATION — $35,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetAT HOME GROUP — $35,000 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetLUNAR INC — $30,000 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetHOPE DENTAL CLINIC — $30,000 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetThe Family Partnership — $25,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetLake Street Council — $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSAINT PAUL AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetCHEQUAMEGON AREA MOUNTAIN BIKE ASSOCIATI — $25,000 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetCREATIVE ENTERPRISE ZONE — $25,000 over 5y, 4.2% of budgetST PAUL CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL FOUNDATION — $24,000 over 5y, 6.3% of budgetBreakthrough Twin Cities — $20,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetPrepare and Prosper — $15,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetExpo Elementary Council of Parents & Teachers Inc — $15,000 over 2y, 8.4% of budgetTHE LOPPET FOUNDATION INC — $15,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTHE BAKKEN — $14,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetWALKER WEST MUSIC ACADEMY — $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMINNESOTA CENTER FOR BOOK ARTS — $10,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetDucks Unlimited Inc — $7,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJUXTAPOSITION ARTS INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMATTER — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHORST RECHELBACHER FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetSAINT PAUL & MINNESOTA FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST PAUL CAPITALS HOCKEY ASSOCIATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ST PAUL ACADEMY AND SUMMIT SCHOOL
  • Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE
  • Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC
  • Who funds SECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND
  • Who funds MILKWEED EDITIONS INC
  • Who funds GREENLIGHT FUND INC
  • Who funds BETA GROUP
  • Who funds Keystone Community Services
  • Who funds The Cookie Cart
  • Who funds NORTHERN STAR COUNCIL
  • Who funds MILL CITY FARMERS MARKET INC
  • Who funds MILL CITY FARMERS MARKET CHARITABLE FUND
  • Who funds WOMENVENTURE
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE MISSISSIPPI RIVER
  • Who funds New Vision Foundation
  • Who funds THE SANNEH FOUNDATION
  • Who funds AT HOME GROUP
  • Who funds LUNAR INC
  • Who funds HOPE DENTAL CLINIC
  • Who funds The Family Partnership
  • Who funds Lake Street Council
  • Who funds SAINT PAUL AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds CHEQUAMEGON AREA MOUNTAIN BIKE ASSOCIATI
  • Who funds CREATIVE ENTERPRISE ZONE
  • Who funds ST PAUL CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Breakthrough Twin Cities
  • Who funds Prepare and Prosper
  • Who funds Expo Elementary Council of Parents & Teachers Inc
  • Who funds THE LOPPET FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds THE BAKKEN

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Saint Paul & Minnesota FoundationMN44.1× affinity22 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · The Minneapolis Foundation · Fr Bigelow Foundation · The McKnight Foundation · Otto Bremer Trust · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation · Hardenbergh Foundation · Target Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · Patrick and Aimee Butler Family · Ch Robinson Worldwide Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Amy and Chip Pearson Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    18report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 62 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph