Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ames Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$865k
Granted FY2024still arriving
18
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$165k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Environment$1.3MEducation$1.2MFood & Nutrition$690kRecreation & Sports$250kYouth Development$170kHuman Services$167kInternational$101kHousing & Shelter$90kOther$0
02FY2024 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k9 grants · $280k
  • $50k–250k9 grants · $585k
$50,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$10M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TUSKEGEE UNIVERSITY$165,000
THINK OF US$70,000
UPPER PENINSULA LAND CONSERVANCY$50,000
NORTHWESTERN MICHIGAN COLLEGE$50,000
SEEDS$50,000
SOUL FIRE FARM$50,000
TART TRAILS INC$50,000
LEELANAU CONSERVANCY$50,000
GRAND TRAVERSE REGIONAL LAND CONSER$50,000
THE ATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK$45,000
CHATTAHOOCHEE RIVERKEEPER$45,000
ONE HUNDRED MILES$40,000
CLARKSTON COMMUNITY CENTER$35,000
DETROIT BLACK COMMUNITY FOOD SOVERE$25,000
THE BERRY CENTER$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $171k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%BOYS TOWN: $400 → 12%THINK OF US: $70k → 14%BOYS TOWN: $200 → 12%THINK OF US: $50k → 14%THINK OF US: $50k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
IL
MI
NY
PA
NJ
NE
KY
VA
MD
TN
NC
DC
MS
AL
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.9M · 30 repeat orgs$316k to everyone else

30 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
11

Total granted

$3.9M
$266k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+44%

Still filing today

63%
82%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EnvironmentEducationFood & NutritionHuman ServicesHealthCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TU
    Tuskegee University
    5× · 2020–2024 · $890k · revenue +42%
  • AC
    ATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $290k · revenue +50%
  • CR
    CHATTAHOOCHEE RIVERKEEPER INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $265k · revenue +35%

Funded once

  • FT
    Feeding the Gulf Coast
    one grant, 2020 · $75k · revenue +11%
  • BO
    BLACK OAKS CENTER FOR SUSTAINABLE RENEWABLE LIVINGgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue +338%
  • S
    SEEDS
    one grant, 2021 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Minnesota Land Trust

The minnesota land trust protects and restores minnesota's most vital natural lands in order to provide wildlife habitat, clean water, outdoor experiences and scenic beauty for generations to come.

Environment
2
Arbor Research Collaborative for Health

Arbor research collaborative for health is committed to improving patient care through research that shapes medical policies and practice. in particular, arbor research conducts health outcomes research on chronic disease and end-stage…

Health
3
Land Conservancy of West Michigan

Our mission is conserving West Michigans ecologically critical land. We protect land by creating public nature preserves, providing support to communities and local governments in creating natural areas, and helping private landowners…

Environment
4
Connecticut Farmland Trust Inc

Protect Connecticuts farmland for agricultural use by purchasing and accepting donations of agricultural conservation easements

Food & Nutrition
5
Native Plant Trust Inc

The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.

Environment
6
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
7
Tenngreen Land Conservancy

The organization's primary mission is conserving land where people and nature can thrive by creating green corridors linking existing public lands using conservation easments and outright purchase.

Recreation & Sports
8
Food & Water Watch

Food & water watch conducts extensive research and public education to ensure the food and water we consume is safe, accessible and sustainably produced. so we can all enjoy and trust in what we eat and drink, we help people take charge of…

Food & Nutrition
9
Oregon Agricultural Trust

Oregon agricultural trust partners with farmers and ranchers to protect agricultural lands for the benefit of oregons economy, communities, and landscapes.

Environment
10
Bartlett Arboretum Association Inc

To cultivate and develop an expansive collection of trees, gardens, and plants for all to explore, enjoy and study; and to provide through education and stewardship, a greener, healthier, more beautiful environment.

Environment
11
Six Rivers Land Conservancy Fka Six Rivers Regional Land Conservancy

To conserve, sustain, and connect natural areas, land, and waters that make the places we live special

Environment
12
Maine Farmland Trust

Maine Farmland Trust protects farmland, supports farmers, and advances the future of farming.

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Soul Fire Farm Institute Inc; the most unlike its peers is The National Museum of Women in the Arts. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/28
Grantees still filing
22/28
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHATTAHOOCHEE RIVERKEEPER INC: $265,000 · EnvironmentCHATTAHOOCHEE RIVERKEEPER INCLEELANAU CONSERVANCY: $250,000 · EnvironmentLEELANAU CONSERVANCYGRAND TRAVERSE REGIONAL LAND CONSERVANCY: $250,000 · EnvironmentGRAND TRAVERSE REGIONAL LAND CONSER…UPPER PENINSULA LAND CONSERVANCY: $175,000 · EnvironmentUPPER PENINSULA LAND CONSERVANCYOne Hundred Miles Inc: $170,000 · EnvironmentOne Hundred Miles IncSEEDS: $150,000 · EnvironmentSEEDSBLACK OAKS CENTER FOR SUSTAINABLE RENEWABLE LIVING: $50,000 · EnvironmentNORTHWESTERN MICHIGAN COLLEGE: $270,000 · OtherNORTHWESTERN MICHIGAN COLLE…TRAVERSE AREA RECREATION & TRANSPORTATION TRAILS INC: $250,000 · OtherTRAVERSE AREA RECREATION & …CLARKSTON COMMUNITY CENTER: $165,000 · OtherCLARKSTON COMMUNITY CENTERLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR: $120,300 · OtherLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POORCOMMUNITY ASSISTANCE CENTER INC: $90,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY ASSISTANCE CENTER…SEEDS: $50,000 · Other+18 more: $74,875 · Other+18 moreTuskegee University: $890,000 · EducationTuskegee UniversityTHE BERRY CENTER INC: $50,000 · Education+2 more: $40,000 · EducationATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC: $290,000 · Food & NutritionATLANTA COMMUNIT…SOUL FIRE FARM INSTITUTE INC: $250,000 · Food & NutritionSOUL FIRE FARM I…Feeding the Gulf Coast: $75,000 · Food & NutritionFeeding the Gulf…THINK OF US: $170,000 · Human Services+1 more: $600 · Human ServicesHigher Purpose Hub: $50,000 · Community ImprovementAutism Improvised Inc: $35,000 · Health+1 more: $250 · Health
Environment$1,310,000Other$1,020,175Education$980,000Food & Nutrition$615,000Human Services$170,600Community Improvement$50,000Health$35,250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTuskegee University: $890,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC: $290,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCHATTAHOOCHEE RIVERKEEPER INC: $265,000 over 5y, 3.2% of budgetTRAVERSE AREA RECREATION & TRANSPORTATION TRAILS INC: $250,000 over 5y, 3.0% of budgetSOUL FIRE FARM INSTITUTE INC: $250,000 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetLEELANAU CONSERVANCY: $250,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetGRAND TRAVERSE REGIONAL LAND CONSERVANCY: $250,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetUPPER PENINSULA LAND CONSERVANCY: $175,000 over 4y, 20% of budgetTHINK OF US: $170,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetOne Hundred Miles Inc: $170,000 over 5y, 3.5% of budgetSEEDS: $150,000 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY ASSISTANCE CENTER INC: $90,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetFeeding the Gulf Coast: $75,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBLACK OAKS CENTER FOR SUSTAINABLE RENEWABLE LIVING: $50,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetHigher Purpose Hub: $50,000 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetTHE BERRY CENTER INC: $50,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetAutism Improvised Inc: $35,000 over 2y, 28% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF THE CUMBERLANDS INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBERRY COLLEGE INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFather Flanagan's Boys' Home: $600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFAIRHOPE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT INC: $400 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetThe Baldwin County Humane Society: $300 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATIONAL MUSEUM OF WOMEN IN THE ARTS: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMPB FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $75 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Tuskegee University ↗
  • Who funds ATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds CHATTAHOOCHEE RIVERKEEPER INC ↗
  • Who funds TRAVERSE AREA RECREATION & TRANSPORTATION TRAILS INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUL FIRE FARM INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds LEELANAU CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds GRAND TRAVERSE REGIONAL LAND CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds UPPER PENINSULA LAND CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds THINK OF US ↗
  • Who funds One Hundred Miles Inc ↗
  • Who funds SEEDS ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Feeding the Gulf Coast ↗
  • Who funds BLACK OAKS CENTER FOR SUSTAINABLE RENEWABLE LIVING ↗
  • Who funds Higher Purpose Hub ↗
  • Who funds THE BERRY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Autism Improvised Inc ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF THE CUMBERLANDS INC ↗
  • Who funds BERRY COLLEGE INC ↗
  • Who funds Father Flanagan's Boys' Home ↗
  • Who funds FAIRHOPE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT INC ↗
  • Who funds The Baldwin County Humane Society ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL RIGHT TO WORK LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Mightycause Charitable FoundationFL11.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ames Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ames Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ames Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph