Skip to content
American Psychiatric Association Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

American Psychiatric Association Foundation

Promote the mental health and well-being of individuals and communities where we live, learn, work, worship, and play.

$1.4M
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$480k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$7.3MPublic Benefit$2.0MEducation$659kScience & Tech$45kRecreation & Sports$27kCommunity Improvement$16kHuman Services$6kCrime & Legal$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 9 grants below total $631,200, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,361,748 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $730,548 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $37k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $94k
  • $250k+1 grant · $480k
$6,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$68M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
APA$480,000
COUNCIL OF STATE GOVERNMENTS$94,200
UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH$20,000
ANN & ROBERT H LURIE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF CHICAGO$7,500
HISPANIC UNITY OF FLORIDA INC$6,000
YALE UNIVERSITY$6,000
A HOME WITHIN$6,000
SER FAMILIA INC$6,000
NAMI GREATER SAN ANTONIO$5,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $35k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 66% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%A HOME WITHIN: $6k → 10%THE ACHIEVABLE FOUNDATION: $6k → 14%SER FAMILIA INC: $6k → 8%ASSOCIATION HOUSE OF CHICAGO: $6k → 14%UNITED AMERICAN INVOLVEMENT INC: $5k → 14%NEIGHBORS' CONSEJO: $6k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
MN
IL
NY
MA
OR
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
CO
MO
KY
VA
MD
DE
NC
DC
LA
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$7.8M · 25 repeat orgs$2.1M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +59% since the first grant, against +48% for those funded once.

25 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 22 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
58

Total granted

$7.8M
$2.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+59%
+48%

Still filing today

64%
66%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $31k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CO
    COUNCIL OF STATE GOVERNMENTS
    7× · 2017–2024 · $1.7M · revenue +70%
  • NA
    NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COUNTIES RESEARCH FOUNDATION
    3× · 2017–2019 · $305k · revenue +64%
  • NY
    New York University
    3× · 2018–2022 · $91k · revenue +59%

Funded once

  • GW
    GREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $1.0M · revenue +26%
  • WGBH Educational Foundation
    one grant, 2019 · $400k · revenue +5%
  • CL
    CO-BRAIN LLC
    one grant, 2022 · $64k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Southern California University of Health Sciences

The mission of southern california university of health sciences (scu) is to educate students as competent, caring and successful practitioners of integrative healthcare. the university is committed to providing excellence in academics,…

Education
2
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
3
Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return

Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.

Health
4
University of Maryland Anesthesiology Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

—
5
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
6
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
8
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
9
University of Maryland Neurosurgeryassociates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Education
10
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
University of Maryland Neurology Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

—
12
University of Maryland Otorhino-Laryngology-Head & Neck Surgery Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Morehouse School of Medicine; the most unlike its peers is Wgbh Educational Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

65 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 65 of the 92 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
64/65
Grantees still filing
51/65
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AMERICAN PSYCHIATRIC ASSOCIATION: $4,310,000 · Community ImprovementAMERICAN PSYCHIATRIC ASSOCIATION+1 more: $5,000 · Community ImprovementCOUNCIL OF STATE GOVERNMENTS: $1,681,200 · OtherCOUNCIL OF STATE GOVERNMENTSNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COUNTIES RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $305,000 · OtherNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COUNTIES …REGENTS UNIV OF CALIFORNIA: $166,180 · OtherREGENTS UNIV OF CALIFORNIAUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO: $156,056 · Other+42 more: $713,364 · Other+42 moreGREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION INC: $1,000,000 · Arts & CultureGREATER WASHING…WGBH Educational Foundation: $400,000 · Arts & CultureWGBH Educationa…+1 more: $5,000 · Arts & CultureEMPLOYERS HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $237,500 · HealthBETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC: $90,000 · HealthBOSTON MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION: $66,070 · HealthLUNDQUIST INSTITUTE FOR BIOMEDICAL INNOVATION AT HARBOR-UCLA MEDICAL CENTER: $49,627 · HealthSOUTH FLORIDA BEHAVIORAL HEALTH NETWORK: $31,000 · HealthKern Medical Center Foundation: $27,884 · HealthUniversity of Maryland Medical System Corporation: $26,070 · HealthBUTLER HOSPITAL: $26,070 · HealthBROOKDALE HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER: $25,158 · HealthUC HEALTHCARE SYSTEM: $25,158 · Health+7 more: $48,500 · HealthYale University: $133,024 · EducationNew York University: $91,014 · EducationThe George Washington University: $76,716 · EducationICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI: $62,590 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $57,490 · EducationUNIVERSITY PHYSICIANS OF BROOKLYN INC: $43,093 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $40,000 · EducationMOREHOUSE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $38,012 · EducationTHE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND: $35,714 · EducationPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $24,793 · Education+7 more: $50,000 · EducationA HOME WITHIN INC: $6,000 · Human ServicesNEIGHBORS' CONSEJO: $6,000 · Human ServicesSER FAMILIA: $6,000 · Human ServicesASSOCIATION HOUSE OF CHICAGO: $6,000 · Human ServicesTHE ACHIEVABLE FOUNDATION: $6,000 · Human ServicesUNITED AMERICAN INDIAN INVOLVEMENT INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesNorthwestern University: $27,114 · Recreation & Sports
Community Improvement$4,315,000Other$3,021,800Arts & Culture$1,405,000Health$653,037Education$652,446Human Services$35,000Recreation & Sports$27,114

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICAN PSYCHIATRIC ASSOCIATION: $4,310,000 over 7y, 1.6% of budgetCOUNCIL OF STATE GOVERNMENTS: $1,681,200 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetGREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION INC: $1,000,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetWGBH Educational Foundation: $400,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COUNTIES RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $305,000 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetEMPLOYERS HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $237,500 over 2y, 8.9% of budgetYale University: $133,024 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNew York University: $91,014 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC: $90,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe George Washington University: $76,716 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBOSTON MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION: $66,070 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI: $62,590 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $57,490 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSan Mateo County Health Foundation: $51,228 over 2y, 6.0% of budgetLUNDQUIST INSTITUTE FOR BIOMEDICAL INNOVATION AT HARBOR-UCLA MEDICAL CENTER: $49,627 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY PHYSICIANS OF BROOKLYN INC: $43,093 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMOREHOUSE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $38,012 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND: $35,714 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTH FLORIDA BEHAVIORAL HEALTH NETWORK: $31,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKern Medical Center Foundation: $27,884 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetNorthwestern University: $27,114 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Maryland Medical System Corporation: $26,070 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBUTLER HOSPITAL: $26,070 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBROOKDALE HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER: $25,158 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUC HEALTHCARE SYSTEM: $25,158 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetASCENSION SETON: $25,158 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $24,793 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HYGIENE INC: $13,750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COUNTIES: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAnn & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLA CLINICA DEL PUEBLO INC: $6,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMary's Center for Maternal and Child Care Inc: $6,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetA HOME WITHIN INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNEIGHBORS' CONSEJO: $6,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSER FAMILIA: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetASSOCIATION HOUSE OF CHICAGO: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHISPANIC UNITY OF FLORIDA INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLGBT CENTER ORLANDO INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetLines for Life: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ACHIEVABLE FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMANI FAMILY SERVICES: $6,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetEL PASO GUIDANCE CENTER INC dba EL PASO CHILD GUIDANCE CENTER: $5,650 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetNAMI GREATER SAN ANTONIO: $5,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAsian Pacific Center for Human Development: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY ADVOCATES FOR FAMILY AND YOUTH: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetWESTERN UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Reach Out and Read IncThe Ralph M Parsons F…American Heart Associ…California Healthcare…Public Health Institu…American Cancer Socie…Unihealth FoundationThe George Washington…Brown UniversityUnidosusTrustees of Boston Un…Washington University
Reach Out and Read IncMA15.1× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Reach Out and Read Inc · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · American Heart Association Inc · California Healthcare Foundation · Public Health Institute · American Cancer Society Inc · Unihealth Foundation · The George Washington University · Brown University · Unidosus · Trustees of Boston University · Washington University

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization American Psychiatric Association Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from American Psychiatric Association Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Lines for Life: 70% of income from government
  • Postpartum Support International: 43% of income from government
  • Community Advocates for Family and Youth: 23% of income from government
  • Boston Medical Center Corporation: 23% of income from government
  • Yale University: 12% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Inc: 6% of income from government
  • Hispanic Unity of Florida Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Wgbh Educational Foundation: 1% of income from government
  • University of Maryland Medical System Corporation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
14report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 92 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on American Psychiatric Association’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home