Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

American Psychiatric Association Foundation

Promote the mental health and well-being of individuals and communities where we live, learn, work, worship, and play.

$1.4M
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$480k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0170% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.

Community Improvement$4.3MArts & Culture$1.4MHealth$653kEducation$652kHuman Services$35kRecreation & Sports$27kCrime & Legal$6kEmployment$5kOther$3.0M
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 9 grants below total $631,200 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,361,748 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $730,548 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $37k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $94k
  • $250k+1 grant · $480k
$6,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$68M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
APA$480,000
COUNCIL OF STATE GOVERNMENTS$94,200
UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH$20,000
ANN & ROBERT H LURIE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF CHICAGO$7,500
SER FAMILIA INC$6,000
A HOME WITHIN$6,000
HISPANIC UNITY OF FLORIDA INC$6,000
YALE UNIVERSITY$6,000
NAMI GREATER SAN ANTONIO$5,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $35k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 66% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%A HOME WITHIN: $6k → 10%THE ACHIEVABLE FOUNDATION: $6k → 14%SER FAMILIA INC: $6k → 8%ASSOCIATION HOUSE OF CHICAGO: $6k → 14%UNITED AMERICAN INVOLVEMENT INC: $5k → 14%NEIGHBORS' CONSEJO: $6k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
MN
IL
NY
MA
OR
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
CO
MO
KY
VA
MD
DE
NC
DC
LA
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$7.8M · 25 repeat orgs$2.1M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +59% since the first grant, against +48% for the ones you funded once.

25 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 22 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
58

Total granted

$7.8M
$2.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+59%
+48%

Still filing today

64%
66%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $31k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CO
    COUNCIL OF STATE GOVERNMENTS
    7× · 2017–2024 · $1.7M · revenue +70%
  • NA
    NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COUNTIES RESEARCH FOUNDATION
    3× · 2017–2019 · $305k · revenue +64%
  • NY
    New York University
    3× · 2018–2022 · $91k · revenue +59%

Funded once

  • GW
    GREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $1.0M · revenue +26%
  • WGBH Educational Foundation
    one grant, 2019 · $400k · revenue +5%
  • CL
    CO-BRAIN LLC
    one grant, 2022 · $64k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Southern California University of Health Sciences

The mission of southern california university of health sciences (scu) is to educate students as competent, caring and successful practitioners of integrative healthcare. the university is committed to providing excellence in academics,…

Education
2
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
3
Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return

Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.

Health
4
University of Maryland Anesthesiology Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

—
5
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
6
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
8
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
9
University of Maryland Neurosurgeryassociates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Education
10
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
University of Maryland Neurology Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

—
12
University of Maryland Otorhino-Laryngology-Head & Neck Surgery Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Morehouse School of Medicine and the most unlike its peers is Wgbh Educational Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyHealth Access Advocacy and …Community FoundationsLgbtq+ Community SupportAffordable Housing Developm…Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Youth Development ServicesPregnancy Support Services
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 41 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%4%5–10yr19%17%10–20yr16%24%20–35yr13%20%35–55yr16%35%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%1%5–10yr19%2%10–20yr16%66%20–35yr13%5%35–55yr16%26%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
1%1/93
the rest of the field
13%
240,395/1,819,472

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

65 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 65 of the 92 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
64/65
Grantees still filing
51/65
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

AMERICAN PSYCHIATRIC ASSOCIATION — $4,310,000 · Community ImprovementAMERICAN PSYCHIATRIC ASSOCIATION+1 more — $5,000 · Community ImprovementCOUNCIL OF STATE GOVERNMENTS — $1,681,200 · OtherCOUNCIL OF STATE GOVERNMENTSNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COUNTIES RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $305,000 · OtherNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COUNTIES …REGENTS UNIV OF CALIFORNIA — $166,180 · OtherREGENTS UNIV OF CALIFORNIAUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO — $156,056 · Other+42 more — $713,364 · Other+42 moreGREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION INC — $1,000,000 · Arts & CultureGREATER WASHING…WGBH Educational Foundation — $400,000 · Arts & CultureWGBH Educationa…+1 more — $5,000 · Arts & CultureEMPLOYERS HEALTH FOUNDATION INC — $237,500 · HealthBETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC — $90,000 · HealthBOSTON MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION — $66,070 · HealthLUNDQUIST INSTITUTE FOR BIOMEDICAL INNOVATION AT HARBOR-UCLA MEDICAL CENTER — $49,627 · HealthSOUTH FLORIDA BEHAVIORAL HEALTH NETWORK — $31,000 · HealthKern Medical Center Foundation — $27,884 · HealthUniversity of Maryland Medical System Corporation — $26,070 · HealthBUTLER HOSPITAL — $26,070 · HealthBROOKDALE HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER — $25,158 · HealthUC HEALTHCARE SYSTEM — $25,158 · Health+7 more — $48,500 · HealthYale University — $133,024 · EducationNew York University — $91,014 · EducationThe George Washington University — $76,716 · EducationICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI — $62,590 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $57,490 · EducationUNIVERSITY PHYSICIANS OF BROOKLYN INC — $43,093 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH — $40,000 · EducationMOREHOUSE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE — $38,012 · EducationTHE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND — $35,714 · EducationPresident and Fellows of Harvard College — $24,793 · Education+7 more — $50,000 · EducationSER FAMILIA — $6,000 · Human ServicesTHE ACHIEVABLE FOUNDATION — $6,000 · Human ServicesNEIGHBORS' CONSEJO — $6,000 · Human ServicesASSOCIATION HOUSE OF CHICAGO — $6,000 · Human ServicesA HOME WITHIN INC — $6,000 · Human ServicesUNITED AMERICAN INDIAN INVOLVEMENT INC — $5,000 · Human ServicesNorthwestern University — $27,114 · Recreation & Sports
Community Improvement$4,315,000Other$3,021,800Arts & Culture$1,405,000Health$653,037Education$652,446Human Services$35,000Recreation & Sports$27,114

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAMERICAN PSYCHIATRIC ASSOCIATION — $4,310,000 over 7y, 1.6% of budgetCOUNCIL OF STATE GOVERNMENTS — $1,681,200 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetGREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION INC — $1,000,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetWGBH Educational Foundation — $400,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COUNTIES RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $305,000 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetEMPLOYERS HEALTH FOUNDATION INC — $237,500 over 2y, 8.9% of budgetYale University — $133,024 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNew York University — $91,014 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC — $90,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe George Washington University — $76,716 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBOSTON MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION — $66,070 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI — $62,590 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $57,490 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSan Mateo County Health Foundation — $51,228 over 2y, 6.0% of budgetLUNDQUIST INSTITUTE FOR BIOMEDICAL INNOVATION AT HARBOR-UCLA MEDICAL CENTER — $49,627 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY PHYSICIANS OF BROOKLYN INC — $43,093 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH — $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMOREHOUSE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE — $38,012 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND — $35,714 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTH FLORIDA BEHAVIORAL HEALTH NETWORK — $31,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKern Medical Center Foundation — $27,884 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetNorthwestern University — $27,114 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Maryland Medical System Corporation — $26,070 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBUTLER HOSPITAL — $26,070 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetASCENSION SETON — $25,158 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBROOKDALE HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER — $25,158 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUC HEALTHCARE SYSTEM — $25,158 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College — $24,793 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HYGIENE INC — $13,750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COUNTIES — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAnn & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago — $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLA CLINICA DEL PUEBLO INC — $6,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMary's Center for Maternal and Child Care Inc — $6,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSER FAMILIA — $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHISPANIC UNITY OF FLORIDA INC — $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLGBT CENTER ORLANDO INC — $6,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE ACHIEVABLE FOUNDATION — $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNEIGHBORS' CONSEJO — $6,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetASSOCIATION HOUSE OF CHICAGO — $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMANI FAMILY SERVICES — $6,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetA HOME WITHIN INC — $6,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetLines for Life — $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEL PASO GUIDANCE CENTER INC dba EL PASO CHILD GUIDANCE CENTER — $5,650 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetNAMI GREATER SAN ANTONIO — $5,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetYouth Guidance — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFCBC COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $5,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetAsian Pacific Center for Human Development — $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Reach Out and Read IncThe Ralph M Parsons F…American Heart Associ…California Healthcare…Public Health Institu…American Cancer Socie…Unihealth FoundationThe George Washington…Brown UniversityUnidosusTrustees of Boston Un…Washington University
Reach Out and Read IncMA15.1× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Reach Out and Read Inc · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · American Heart Association Inc · California Healthcare Foundation · Public Health Institute · American Cancer Society Inc · Unihealth Foundation · The George Washington University · Brown University · Unidosus · Trustees of Boston University · Washington University

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization American Psychiatric Association Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Lines for Life — 70% of income from government
  • Postpartum Support International — 43% of income from government
  • Community Advocates for Family and Youth — 23% of income from government
  • Boston Medical Center Corporation — 23% of income from government
  • Yale University — 12% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Inc — 6% of income from government
  • Hispanic Unity of Florida Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Wgbh Educational Foundation — 1% of income from government
  • University of Maryland Medical System Corporation — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
14report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 92 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines