Skip to content
American Association of the Order of St Lazarus Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

American Association of the Order of St Lazarus Inc

Provides aid to numerous leprosariums while supporting medical treatment of hanson's disease.

$213k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Health$486kHuman Services$72kHousing & Shelter$47kFood & Nutrition$38kReligion$26kEducation$20kArts & Culture$13kPhilanthropy$13kOther$0
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 4 grants below total $43,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $212,500 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $169,500 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $30k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$4.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RISING STAR OUTREACH$20,000
LOYOLA UNIVERSITY JESUIT SOCIAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE$10,000
ST PATRICK'S CATHEDRAL COMMUNITY FUND$8,000
GEORGIA TRANSPLANT FOUNDATION$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $304k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%LOVE & HOPE IN ACTION INC: $30k → 10%Rising Star Outreach: $65k → 8%Food For Kids: $8k → 8%Rising Star Outreach: $55k → 8%Rising Star Outreach: $55k → 8%Rising Star Outreach: $41k → 8%RISING STAR OUTREACH: $30k → 8%RISING STAR OUTREACH: $20k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
CA
UT
CO
VA
HI
LA
GA
TX
FL

Grants abroad, by region: $145k on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 3 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Middle East and North Africa$65k · 45% · 2 grants

Stated purpose: GENERAL ASSISTANCE

North America (Canada and Mexico)$55k · 38% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: GENERAL ASSISTANCE

Sub-Saharan Africa$25k · 17% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: GENERAL ASSISTANCE

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$574k · 10 repeat orgs$152k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
11

Total granted

$574k
$142k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+10%
+16%

Still filing today

90%
82%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesReligionEducationHousing & ShelterArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RS
    Rising Star Outreach Inc
    6× · 2019–2024 · $266k · revenue +59%
  • A
    ASCENCIA
    3× · 2020–2023 · $38k · revenue +63%
  • CT
    CHILDRENS TRANSPLANT INITIATIVE
    2× · 2020–2021 · $35k · revenue +258%

Funded once

  • BENEVOLENT HEALTHCARE FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $26k · revenue +47%
  • LD
    LEGACY DONOR FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue -1%
  • TC
    Texas Children's Hospital
    one grant, 2023 · $19k · revenue +16%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lifegift Organ Donation Center

The mission of lifegift is to provide community benefit by ethically, effectively and efficiently recovering appropriately transplantable organs and tissue to give the gift of life. lifegift also provides public and professional education…

Health
2
Temple University Hospital Inc

See Schedule OOur mission is to support Temple University and its Health Sciences Center academic programs by providing the clinical environment and service to support the highest quality teaching and training programs for health care…

Health
3
Lifelink Foundation Inc

To honor donors and save lives through organ and tissue donation. (expanded mission on schedule o)

Health
4
Gift of Hope Organ & Tissue Donor Network

To save and enhance the lives of as many people as possible through organ and tissue donation.

Health
5
Transplant House of West Michigan

The Transplant House of West Michigan is organized to provide individuals and their families that are going through the organ transplant process an affordable temporary home away from home in West Michigan to ease the transitions of their…

Housing & Shelter
6
Midwest Transplant Network Inc

Saving lives by honoring the gift of organ and tissue donation with dignity and compassion.

Health
7
Christus Foundation for HealthCare

CHRISTUS Foundation for HealthCare is dedicated to extending the healing ministry of Jesus Christ, continuing the legacy of the Congregation of the Sisters of Charity of the Incarnate Word through the promotion of health and welfare to…

Health
8
Baylor Research Institute

To improve the care and well being of our community, nationally and internationally, through innovative clinically relevant research that is consistent with the mission, vision and values of Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH).

Health
9
Transplant Foundation

To support organ and tissue donation and transplantation.

Health
10
Children's Hospital & Research Center At Oakland

The mission of children's hospital & research center at oakland is to protect and advance the health and well-being of children through clinical care, teaching and research.

Health
11
Tenet Healthcare Foundation
Philanthropy
12
Greater Delaware Valley Society of Transplant Surgeons

Gift of life donor program, the tax-exempt non-profit federally designated organization serving the eastern half of pennsylvania, southern new jersey, and delaware, is responsible for recovering and allocating organs and tissues used in…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Texas Children's Hospital; the most unlike its peers is Na Aikane O Pu'ukohola Heiau. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
12/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Rising Star Outreach Inc: $266,000 · Human ServicesRising Star Outreach IncLOVE AND HOPE IN ACTION INC: $71,000 · Human ServicesLOVE AND HOPE IN ACTION INC+1 more: $8,000 · Human ServicesTRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION INC CENTRAL TEXAS CHAPTER: $61,000 · OtherTRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS …CHILDRENS TRANSPLANT INITIATIVE: $35,000 · OtherCHILDRENS TRANSPLANT I…NATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR RARE DISORDERS INC: $19,000 · OtherNATIONAL ORGANIZATION …Saint Patrick's Cathedral: $13,000 · OtherSaint Patrick's Cathed…OUR SAVIOR PARISH AND USC CARUSO CATHOLIC CENTER: $10,000 · OtherOUR SAVIOR PARISH AND …NOTRE DAME SEMINARY OF NEW ORLEANS: $6,000 · OtherNora's Gift Foundation Inc: $31,000 · HealthNora's Gift Founda…BENEVOLENT HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $26,275 · HealthBENEVOLENT HEALTHC…LEGACY DONOR FOUNDATION: $20,000 · HealthLEGACY DONOR FOUND…Texas Children's Hospital: $19,000 · HealthTexas Children's H…Georgia Transplant Foundation Inc: $15,000 · HealthGeorgia Transplant…MENTAL HEALTH ADVOCACY SERVICES INC: $10,000 · HealthMENTAL HEALTH ADVO…ASCENCIA: $38,000 · Housing & ShelterGRACE AT THE GREEN LIGHT INC: $9,000 · Housing & ShelterUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION: $25,000 · EducationLOYOLA UNIVERSITY: $10,000 · EducationUkrainian Catholic University Foundation: $10,000 · ReligionBUCKHEAD CHRISTIAN MINISTRY INC: $10,000 · ReligionNA AIKANE O PU'UKOHOLA HEIAU: $13,280 · Arts & Culture
Human Services$345,000Other$144,000Health$121,275Housing & Shelter$47,000Education$35,000Religion$20,000Arts & Culture$13,280

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRising Star Outreach Inc: $266,000 over 6y, 4.3% of budgetLOVE AND HOPE IN ACTION INC: $71,000 over 3y, 3.4% of budgetTRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION INC CENTRAL TEXAS CHAPTER: $61,000 over 2y, 10% of budgetASCENCIA: $38,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetCHILDRENS TRANSPLANT INITIATIVE: $35,000 over 2y, 6.7% of budgetNora's Gift Foundation Inc: $31,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetBENEVOLENT HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $26,275 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLEGACY DONOR FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetTexas Children's Hospital: $19,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR RARE DISORDERS INC: $19,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGeorgia Transplant Foundation Inc: $15,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetMENTAL HEALTH ADVOCACY SERVICES INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetUkrainian Catholic University Foundation: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBUCKHEAD CHRISTIAN MINISTRY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetLOYOLA UNIVERSITY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD FOR KIDS: $8,000 over 1y, 9.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Shell USA Company Fou…American Endowment Fo…Network for GoodNational Philanthropi…Morgan Stanley Global…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…The Blackbaud Giving …Charities Aid Foundat…Vanguard Charitable E…The Bank of America C…Donor Advised Charita…American Online Givin…
Shell USA Company FoundationTX10.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Shell USA Company Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization American Association of the Order of St Lazarus Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from American Association of the Order of St Lazarus Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to American Association of the Order of St Lazarus Inc?

    Find your warmest path to American Association of the Order of St Lazarus Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on American Association of the Order of St Lazarus’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home