· Private foundation
Allone Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k13 grants · $82k
- $10k–50k21 grants · $285k
- $50k–250k22 grants · $2.5M
- $250k+6 grants · $2.8M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SCRANTON AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $1,000,000 |
| ALLIED SERVICES | $500,000 |
| TELESPOND SENIOR SERVICES | $400,000 |
| NORTH PENN COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH SER | $322,500 |
| COMMISSION ON ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY | $300,000 |
| WILKES UNIVERSITY | $250,000 |
| CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA FOOD BANK | $200,000 |
| COMMUNITY ACTION COMMITTEE OF LEHIG | $200,000 |
| CHILDREN'S SERVICE CENTER | $175,000 |
| SCRANTON SCHOOL DISTRICT | $175,000 |
| CITY OF WILLIAMSPORT | $161,645 |
| WYOMING COUNTY HEALTHCARE CENTER | $150,000 |
| WVIA | $125,000 |
| UNITED WAY OF WYOMING VALLEY | $124,000 |
| POCONO SERVICES FOR FAMILIES AND CH | $107,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $4.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
96 repeat relationships — 43 still active in FY2025, 53 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $957k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CSCHILDRENS SVC CTR OF WYOM VALLEY INC7× · 2019–2025 · $2.8M · revenue +74%
- TWThe Wright Center Medical Group6× · 2019–2025 · $1.7M · revenue +240%
- UOUniversity of Scranton6× · 2019–2025 · $1.2M · revenue +17%
Funded once
- CBCLEAR BROOK FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2019 · $400k · revenue -94%
- MCMAYOR CUAST HAZLETON REVITALIZATIONone grant, 2023 · $350k
- MUMANSFIELD UNIVERSITYone grant, 2022 · $126k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Wayne Memorial Community Health Centers creates and sustains healthy rural communities by providing accessible, high quality medical, dental and behavioral health care for all, while recognizing and addressing other factors that influence…
To coordinate services among private and government agencies for specialized populations to ensure service continuity, reduce duplication, and assist individuals and families in accessing appropriate mental health, intellectual…
Vna home health services provides part-time, skilled, intermittent home health services that have been ordered by a physician and are medically necessary to the treatment of an illness or injury. vna home health services offers a wide…
Services to challenged individuals in Vocational,Residential, Home Based, and Community settings.
Philhaven promotes hope, healing and wholeness through the provision of behavioral resources.
Wrc pennsylvania memorial home's mission is to provide choices for generations. built on a not-for-profit foundation of caring, the organization offers residential and personal care, home and community-based services, skilled and…
Ucp of central pennsylvania empowers people of diverse abilities to live meaningful life through innovative support and services.
Berks counseling center (bcc) is a recovery oriented certified community behavioral health center (ccbhc) with an integrated behavioral and physical health model of service delivery. the center provides a holistic approach to a culturally…
UPMC Williamsport is a subsidiary of UPMC Susquehanna. The mission of UPMC Susquehanna and its subsidiaries is to serve the community by providing outstanding patient care and shaping tomorrow's health care through clinical and…
Rhc's health centers provide comprehensive medical and dental care to individuals throughout northeastern pennsylvania. primary care services include pediatric, adolescent, adult, and geriatric medicine; diagnostic evaluations; treatment…
To provide high quality, cost effective, primary health care and to coordinate care for patients requiring secondary and tertiary services.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Wyoming Valley and the most unlike its peers is Evergreen Community Charter School. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 43 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 17% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
96 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 96 of the 203 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CHILDRENS SVC CTR OF WYOM VALLEY INC ↗
- Who funds The Wright Center Medical Group ↗
- Who funds University of Scranton ↗
- Who funds SCRANTON AREA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDSHIP HOUSE ↗
- Who funds TELESPOND SENIOR SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds STEP BY STEP INC ↗
- Who funds MATERNAL & FAMILY HEALTH SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds COMMISSION ON ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY OF LUZERNE COUNTY ↗
- Who funds MISERICORDIA UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds WYOMING COUNTY HEALTHCARE CENTER II ↗
- Who funds THE LUZERNE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PENNSYLVANIA CASA ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds KING'S COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds Northern Tier Counseling Inc ↗
- Who funds CLEAR BROOK FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF WYOMING VALLEY ↗
- Who funds HOPE ENTERPRISES INC ↗
- Who funds BRIGHTER JOURNEYS ↗
- Who funds WRC INC ↗
- Who funds OUTREACH - CENTER FOR COMMUNITY RESOURCES ↗
- Who funds WAYNE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds POCONO MOUNTAINS UNITED WAY ↗
- Who funds VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE ↗
- Who funds NORTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA EDUCATIONAL TELEVISION ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds WILKES UNIVERSITY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Allone Charities · Moses Taylor Foundation Inc · Scranton Area Foundation Inc · William G McGowan Charitable Fund · The Luzerne Foundation · Robert H Spitz Foundation · Ppl Foundation · The Harry and Jeanette Weinberg Foundation Inc · The Hawk Family Foundation · Northeastern Pennsylvania Health Care Foundation · The Tambur Family Foundation · Margaret Briggs Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Allone Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Allone Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Allone Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.