Skip to content
Allone Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

Allone Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$5.7M
Granted FY2025still arriving
62
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$1.0M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Health$19MHuman Services$3.1MPhilanthropy$3.0MEducation$2.7MReligion$1.7MFood & Nutrition$1.6MHousing & Shelter$902kCrime & Legal$878kOther$0
02FY2025 · 62 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k13 grants · $82k
  • $10k–50k21 grants · $285k
  • $50k–250k22 grants · $2.5M
  • $250k+6 grants · $2.8M
$12,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$133M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SCRANTON AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$1,000,000
ALLIED SERVICES$500,000
TELESPOND SENIOR SERVICES$400,000
NORTH PENN COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH SER$322,500
COMMISSION ON ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY$300,000
WILKES UNIVERSITY$250,000
CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA FOOD BANK$200,000
COMMUNITY ACTION COMMITTEE OF LEHIG$200,000
CHILDREN'S SERVICE CENTER$175,000
SCRANTON SCHOOL DISTRICT$175,000
CITY OF WILLIAMSPORT$161,645
WYOMING COUNTY HEALTHCARE CENTER$150,000
WVIA$125,000
UNITED WAY OF WYOMING VALLEY$124,000
POCONO SERVICES FOR FAMILIES AND CH$107,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $4.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%TURN TO US INC: $33k → 10%TURN TO US INC: $17k → 10%HOPE ENTERPRISES: $133k → 12%HOPE ENTERPRISES: $129k → 12%STEP BY STEP INC: $350k → 15%WAYNE COUNTY YMCA: $15k → 13%STEP BY STEP INC: $350k → 15%HOPE ENTERPRISES: $45k → 12%SUPPORTING AREA FAMILIES EVERYDAY: $63k → 12%WAYNE COUNTY YMCA: $15k → 13%HOPE ENTERPRISES: $45k → 12%VALLEY YOUTH HOUSE COMMITTEE INC: $20k → 11%TELESPOND SENIOR SERVICES: $413k → 13%VALLEY YOUTH HOUSE COMMITTEE INC: $20k → 11%TELESPOND SENIOR SERVICES: $400k → 13%FRIENDSHIP HOUSE: $332k → 13%RIVER VALLEY REGIONAL YMCA: $15k → 12%FUTURES COMMUNITY SUPPORT SERVICES: $13k → 12%RIVER VALLEY REGIONAL YMCA: $15k → 12%SUPPORTING AREA FAMILIES EVERYDAY: $13k → 12%FRIENDSHIP HOUSE: $221k → 13%LYCOMING-CLINTON JOINDER BOARD: $13k → 12%FUTURES COMMUNITY SUPPORT SERVICES: $13k → 12%POCONO SERVICES FOR FAMILIES AND CH: $108k → 12%FRIENDSHIP HOUSE: $162k → 13%POCONO SERVICES FOR FAMILIES AND CH: $18k → 12%FRIENDSHIP HOUSE: $154k → 13%POCONO SERVICES FOR FAMILIES AND CH: $10k → 12%OUTREACH - CENTER FOR COMMUNITY RES: $100k → 13%VICTIMS RESOURCE CENTER: $50k → 15%FRIENDSHIP HOUSE: $111k → 13%SAFE MONROE: $10k → 12%OUTREACH - CENTER FOR COMMUNITY RES: $100k → 13%VICTIMS RESOURCE CENTER: $50k → 15%SAFE MONROE: $10k → 12%OUTREACH - CENTER FOR COMMUNITY RES: $100k → 13%SCRANTON LACKAWANNA HUMAN DEVELOPME: $40k → 13%SAFE INC: $60k → 15%SCRANTON LACKAWANNA HUMAN DEVELOPME: $40k → 13%HAZLETON INTEGRATION PROJECT: $100k → 15%SAFE INC: $60k → 15%CASA OF LUZERNE COUNTY: $50k → 15%CASA OF LUZERNE COUNTY: $50k → 15%TELESPOND SENIOR SERVICES: $13k → 13%GREATER SCRANTON YMCA: $30k → 13%GREATER SCRANTON YMCA: $30k → 13%GREATER SCRANTON YMCA: $18k → 13%GREATER SCRANTON YMCA: $10k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$29M · 96 repeat orgs$3.1M to everyone else

96 repeat relationships: 43 still active in FY2025, 53 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

96
89

Total granted

$29M
$2.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
+18%

Still filing today

69%
18%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $957k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationFood & NutritionPhilanthropyHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CS
    CHILDRENS SVC CTR OF WYOM VALLEY INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $2.8M · revenue +74%
  • TW
    The Wright Center Medical Group
    6× · 2019–2025 · $1.7M · revenue +240%
  • UO
    University of Scranton
    6× · 2019–2025 · $1.2M · revenue +17%

Funded once

  • CB
    CLEAR BROOK FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2019 · $400k · revenue -94%
  • MC
    MAYOR CUAST HAZLETON REVITALIZATION
    one grant, 2023 · $350k
  • MU
    MANSFIELD UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2022 · $126k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Northeastern Pennsylvania Health Care Foundation
Education
2
Wayne Memorial Community Health Centers

Wayne Memorial Community Health Centers creates and sustains healthy rural communities by providing accessible, high quality medical, dental and behavioral health care for all, while recognizing and addressing other factors that influence…

Health
3
Center for Community Resources Inc

To coordinate services among private and government agencies for specialized populations to ensure service continuity, reduce duplication, and assist individuals and families in accessing appropriate mental health, intellectual…

Health
4
Vna Home Health Services

Vna home health services provides part-time, skilled, intermittent home health services that have been ordered by a physician and are medically necessary to the treatment of an illness or injury. vna home health services offers a wide…

—
5
Human Resources Center Inc

Services to challenged individuals in Vocational,Residential, Home Based, and Community settings.

Human Services
6
Philhaven

Philhaven promotes hope, healing and wholeness through the provision of behavioral resources.

Health
7
Wrc Pennsylvania Memorial Home

Wrc pennsylvania memorial home's mission is to provide choices for generations. built on a not-for-profit foundation of caring, the organization offers residential and personal care, home and community-based services, skilled and…

Health
8
United Cerebral Palsy of Central Pennsylvania

Ucp of central pennsylvania empowers people of diverse abilities to live meaningful life through innovative support and services.

—
9
Berks Counseling Center Inc

Berks counseling center (bcc) is a recovery oriented certified community behavioral health center (ccbhc) with an integrated behavioral and physical health model of service delivery. the center provides a holistic approach to a culturally…

Health
10
Upmc Williamsport

UPMC Williamsport is a subsidiary of UPMC Susquehanna. The mission of UPMC Susquehanna and its subsidiaries is to serve the community by providing outstanding patient care and shaping tomorrow's health care through clinical and…

Health
11
Rural Health Corporation of Northeastern Pennsylvania

Rhc's health centers provide comprehensive medical and dental care to individuals throughout northeastern pennsylvania. primary care services include pediatric, adolescent, adult, and geriatric medicine; diagnostic evaluations; treatment…

Health
12
Punxsutawney Area Hospital Inc

To provide high quality, cost effective, primary health care and to coordinate care for patients requiring secondary and tertiary services.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Wyoming Valley; the most unlike its peers is Evergreen Community Charter School. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

96 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 96 of the 203 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

5
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
18
Early backer (in before they grew)
93/96
Grantees still filing
57/96
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ALLIED SERVICES: $2,050,000 · OtherALLIED SERVICESLUZERNE COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE FO: $1,274,093 · OtherLUZERNE COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOGEISINGER COMMONWEALTH SCHOOL OF ME: $1,200,000 · OtherGEISINGER COMMONWEALTH SCHOOL OF MECEO WEINBERG NORTHEAST REGIONAL FOO: $1,027,500 · OtherCEO WEINBERG NORTHEAST REGIONAL FOONORTH PENN COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH SER: $945,000 · OtherNORTH PENN COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH SERTREATMENT COURT ADVOCACY CENTER: $610,000 · OtherGEISINGER: $591,767 · OtherEAST STROUDSBURG UNIVERSITY FOUNDAT: $523,680 · OtherCOMMISSION ON ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY OF LUZERNE COUNTY: $592,000 · Other+123 more: $6,890,366 · Other+123 moreCHILDRENS SVC CTR OF WYOM VALLEY INC: $2,761,040 · HealthCHILDRENS SVC CTR OF…MATERNAL & FAMILY HEALTH SERVICES INC: $609,375 · HealthMATERNAL & FAMILY HE…WYOMING COUNTY HEALTHCARE CENTER II: $504,357 · HealthWYOMING COUNTY HEALT…Northern Tier Counseling Inc: $403,490 · HealthNorthern Tier Counse…CLEAR BROOK FOUNDATION INC: $400,000 · HealthCLEAR BROOK FOUNDATI…WAYNE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL: $299,400 · HealthVOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE: $254,375 · Health+13 more: $827,917 · Health+13 moreFRIENDSHIP HOUSE: $978,100 · Human ServicesFRIENDSHIP HOU…TELESPOND SENIOR SERVICES INC: $825,000 · Human ServicesTELESPOND SENI…STEP BY STEP INC: $700,000 · Human ServicesSTEP BY STEP I…HOPE ENTERPRISES INC: $352,440 · Human ServicesHOPE ENTERPRIS…OUTREACH - CENTER FOR COMMUNITY RESOURCES: $300,000 · Human ServicesOUTREACH - CEN…+20 more: $1,075,619 · Human Services+20 moreUniversity of Scranton: $1,233,790 · EducationUniversity…MISERICORDIA UNIVERSITY: $518,113 · EducationMISERICORD…THE LUZERNE FOUNDATION: $462,000 · EducationTHE LUZERN…KING'S COLLEGE: $446,875 · EducationKING'S COL…WILKES UNIVERSITY: $250,000 · EducationWILKES UNI…JOHNSON COLLEGE: $107,500 · Education+6 more: $150,368 · EducationSCRANTON AREA FOUNDATION INC: $1,000,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF WYOMING VALLEY: $354,000 · PhilanthropyBRIGHTER JOURNEYS: $350,000 · PhilanthropyPOCONO MOUNTAINS UNITED WAY: $259,834 · Philanthropy+1 more: $50,000 · PhilanthropyThe Wright Center Medical Group: $1,727,028 · ReligionCENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA FOOD BANK: $797,500 · Food & NutritionCHILD HUNGER OUTREACH PARTNERS: $75,000 · Food & Nutrition+3 more: $40,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$15,704,406Health$6,059,954Human Services$4,231,159Education$3,168,646Philanthropy$2,013,834Religion$1,727,028Food & Nutrition$912,500

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHILDRENS SVC CTR OF WYOM VALLEY INC: $2,761,040 over 7y, 2.0% of budgetThe Wright Center Medical Group: $1,727,028 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetUniversity of Scranton: $1,233,790 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetFRIENDSHIP HOUSE: $978,100 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetTELESPOND SENIOR SERVICES INC: $825,000 over 3y, 15% of budgetCENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA FOOD BANK: $797,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetSTEP BY STEP INC: $700,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetMATERNAL & FAMILY HEALTH SERVICES INC: $609,375 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetCOMMISSION ON ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY OF LUZERNE COUNTY: $592,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetMISERICORDIA UNIVERSITY: $518,113 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetWYOMING COUNTY HEALTHCARE CENTER II: $504,357 over 2y, 10% of budgetTHE LUZERNE FOUNDATION: $462,000 over 2y, 5.4% of budgetPENNSYLVANIA CASA ASSOCIATION INC: $449,664 over 2y, 31% of budgetKING'S COLLEGE: $446,875 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetNorthern Tier Counseling Inc: $403,490 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetCLEAR BROOK FOUNDATION INC: $400,000 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetUNITED WAY OF WYOMING VALLEY: $354,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetHOPE ENTERPRISES INC: $352,440 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetBRIGHTER JOURNEYS: $350,000 over 5y, 65% of budgetWRC INC: $326,831 over 4y, 2.9% of budgetOUTREACH - CENTER FOR COMMUNITY RESOURCES: $300,000 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetWAYNE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL: $299,400 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPOCONO MOUNTAINS UNITED WAY: $259,834 over 3y, 19% of budgetVOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE: $254,375 over 4y, 7.6% of budgetNORTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA EDUCATIONAL TELEVISION ASSOCIATION: $250,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetWILKES UNIVERSITY: $250,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetVariety the Childrens Charity: $200,000 over 3y, 3.5% of budgetCAMP ORCHARD HILL INC: $180,000 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetDAUPHIN COUNTY VOA LIVING CENTER INC: $170,000 over 2y, 57% of budgetDINNERS FOR KIDS INC: $165,000 over 5y, 16% of budgetSERVING SENIORS INC: $140,000 over 4y, 9.7% of budgetPOCONO SERVICES FOR FAMILIES AND CHILDREN INCORPORATED: $135,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTHINKBIG PEDIATRIC CANCER FUND INC: $125,000 over 1y, 19% of budgetWYOMING VALLEY CHILDREN'S ASSOCIATION: $122,500 over 4y, 2.5% of budgetNEPA INCLUSIVE: $120,000 over 2y, 3.7% of budgetSCRANTON NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING SERVICES INC: $120,000 over 4y, 2.6% of budgetS A F E: $120,000 over 2y, 59% of budgetGEISINGER CLINIC: $116,667 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCASA OF WYOMING VALLEY: $109,375 over 2y, 12% of budgetJOHNSON COLLEGE: $107,500 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetYoung Men's Christian Association of Greater Scranton: $105,619 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetVICTIMS RESOURCE CENTER: $100,000 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetNORTHEAST REGIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE: $100,000 over 2y, 3.8% of budgetLEHIGH VALLEY HOSPITAL: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLACKAWANNA COLLEGE: $82,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAGENCY FOR COMMUNITY EMPOWERMENT OF NEPA: $80,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCHILD HUNGER OUTREACH PARTNERS: $75,000 over 2y, 5.4% of budgetSUPPORTING AREA FAMILIES EVERYDAY: $75,000 over 2y, 18% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHILDRENS SVC CTR OF WYOM VALLEY INC ↗
  • Who funds The Wright Center Medical Group ↗
  • Who funds University of Scranton ↗
  • Who funds SCRANTON AREA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDSHIP HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds TELESPOND SENIOR SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds STEP BY STEP INC ↗
  • Who funds MATERNAL & FAMILY HEALTH SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMISSION ON ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY OF LUZERNE COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds MISERICORDIA UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds WYOMING COUNTY HEALTHCARE CENTER II ↗
  • Who funds THE LUZERNE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PENNSYLVANIA CASA ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds KING'S COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Northern Tier Counseling Inc ↗
  • Who funds CLEAR BROOK FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF WYOMING VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds HOPE ENTERPRISES INC ↗
  • Who funds BRIGHTER JOURNEYS ↗
  • Who funds WRC INC ↗
  • Who funds OUTREACH - CENTER FOR COMMUNITY RESOURCES ↗
  • Who funds WAYNE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds POCONO MOUNTAINS UNITED WAY ↗
  • Who funds VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE ↗
  • Who funds NORTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA EDUCATIONAL TELEVISION ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds WILKES UNIVERSITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Allone CharitiesMoses Taylor Foundati…Scranton Area Foundat…William G McGowan Cha…The Luzerne FoundationRobert H Spitz Founda…Ppl FoundationThe Harry and Jeanett…The Hawk Family Found…Northeastern Pennsylv…The Tambur Family Fou…Margaret Briggs Found…
Allone CharitiesPA111.6× affinity52 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Allone Charities · Moses Taylor Foundation Inc · Scranton Area Foundation Inc · William G McGowan Charitable Fund · The Luzerne Foundation · Robert H Spitz Foundation · Ppl Foundation · The Harry and Jeanette Weinberg Foundation Inc · The Hawk Family Foundation · Northeastern Pennsylvania Health Care Foundation · The Tambur Family Foundation · Margaret Briggs Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Allone Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Allone Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    34report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Allone Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Allone Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 203 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Allone’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home