Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Margaret Briggs Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$786k
Granted FY2024still arriving
42
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What you fund
0196% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Human Services$1.2MPhilanthropy$855kYouth Development$570kHealth$465kEducation$424kFood & Nutrition$373kHousing & Shelter$269kArts & Culture$263kOther$0
02FY2024 · 42 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k17 grants · $67k
  • $10k–50k24 grants · $569k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $150k
$12,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$10M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNITED WAY OF LACKAWANNA AND WAYNE COUNT$150,000
ALL ONE CHARITIES$35,000
UNITED NEIGHBORHOOD CENTERS OF NEPA$30,000
IGNATIAN VOLUNTEER CORPS INC$30,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF NEPA$30,000
CATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES$30,000
Lacawac Sanctuary$30,000
CATHERINE MCAULEY CENTER$27,500
PENN STATE UNIVERSITY PHILANTHROPY FUND$25,000
EVERHART MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY$25,000
YOUTH ARTS COALITION$25,000
CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF$25,000
Individual grant recipient$25,000
ST FRANCIS OF ASISI KITCHEN$25,000
VALLEY YOUTH HOUSE$25,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $590k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MON-N-PA: $20k → 8%ALL ONE CHARITIES: $35k → 15%ALLONE CHARITIES: $25k → 15%ALLONE CHARITIES: $10k → 15%GREATER SCRANTON YMCA: $20k → 13%GREATER SCRANTON YMCA: $13k → 13%GREATER SCRANTON YMCA: $10k → 13%NORTHEASTERN CHILDCARE SERVICES: $36k → 13%ST JOSEPH'S CENTER: $28k → 13%ST JOSEPH'S CENTER: $28k → 13%ST JOSEPH'S CENTER: $28k → 13%NORTHEASTERN CHILDCARE SERVICES: $12k → 13%NORTHEASTERN CHILDCARE SERVICES: $12k → 13%NORTHEASTERN CHILDCARE SERVICES: $12k → 13%NORTHEASTERN CHILDCARE SERVICES: $12k → 13%NORTHEASTERN CHILDCARE SERVICES: $12k → 13%NORTHEASTERN CHILDCARE SERVICES: $12k → 13%NORTHEASTERN CHILDCARE SERVICES: $11k → 13%ST JOSEPH'S CENTER: $3k → 13%ST JOSEPH'S CENTER: $3k → 13%ST JOSEPH'S CENTER: $3k → 13%ST JOSEPH'S CENTER: $3k → 13%ST JOSEPH'S CENTER: $3k → 13%DRESS FOR SUCCESS LACKAWANNA: $25k → 13%DRESS FOR SUCCESS LACKAWANNA: $10k → 13%TELESPOND SENIOR SERVICES INC: $30k → 13%CATHERINE MCAULEY CENTER: $28k → 13%TELESPOND SENIOR SERVICES INC: $23k → 13%TELESPOND SENIOR SERVICES INC: $23k → 13%TELESPOND SENIOR SERVICES INC: $20k → 13%TELESPOND SENIOR SERVICES INC: $16k → 13%CATHERINE MCAULEY CENTER: $13k → 13%TELESPOND SENIOR SERVICES INC: $5k → 13%TELESPOND SENIOR SERVICES INC: $5k → 13%Agency for Community EmPOWERment: $2k → 13%CATHERINE MCAULEY CENTER: $3k → 13%CATHERINE MCAULEY CENTER: $3k → 13%CATHERINE MCAULEY CENTER: $3k → 13%CATHERINE MCAULEY CENTER: $3k → 13%Agency for Community EmPOWERment: $2k → 13%TELESPOND SENIOR SERVICES INC: $3k → 13%Agency for Community EmPOWERment: $2k → 13%CATHERINE MCAULEY CENTER: $3k → 13%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $15k → 13%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $10k → 13%CATHERINE MCAULEY CENTER: $3k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$4.6M · 68 repeat orgs$621k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +32% since the first grant, against +22% for the ones you funded once.

68 repeat relationships — 35 still active in FY2024, 33 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

68
46

Total granted

$4.6M
$530k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+22%

Still filing today

54%
37%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $92k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthArts & CultureHousing & ShelterEducationEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF LACKAWANNA WAYNE AND PIKE COUNTIES
    3× · 2022–2024 · $375k · revenue +30%
  • TS
    TELESPOND SENIOR SERVICES INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $123k · revenue +41%
  • MO
    MEALS ON WHEELS OF NORTHEASTERN PA INC
    6× · 2017–2024 · $108k · revenue +103%

Funded once

  • UN
    UNITED NEIGHBORHOOD CENTERS
    one grant, 2021 · $50k
  • NO
    NEIGHBORWORKS OF NE
    one grant, 2022 · $28k
  • EO
    EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY AND TRAINING
    one grant, 2017 · $25k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Scranton-Lackawanna Resources Development Corporation

To provide affordable housing to people of lackawanna county

Human Services
2
Northeastern Pennsylvania Health Care Foundation
Education
3
Schuylkill Community Action

Schuylkill community action is a private, nonprofit corporationincorporated under the laws of the commonwealth of pennsylvania. theprimary purpose of schuylkill community action is to coordinate andfocus all available resources upon the…

4
Catholic Social Services of the Diocese of Scranton Inc

To provide a variety of social services to individuals and families residing in northeastern pennsylvania, including, but not limited to, counseling, provision of goods, and provision of housing.

Human Services
5
Lackawanna Neighbors Inc

The organization's purpose is to provide affordable housing to low and moderate income families in scranton and surrounding lackawanna county, pa.

Housing & Shelter
6
Scranton Chamber of Commerce

The organization promotes business interests and economic and workforce development in the greater scranton area of lackawanna county.

7
Center for Community Action

The center for community action is the designated lead poverty agency for blair, bedford, fulton, and huntingdon counties in central pennsylvania and exists to provide a broad spectrum of services to the low income residents of the…

Housing & Shelter
8
Montco Anti-Hunger Network

By leading coordinated action, montco anti-hunger network strengthens the food security safety net system in montgomery county, pa, working to end hunger in montgomery county.

Food & Nutrition
9
South Central Emergency Medical Services Inc

Provide emergency medical services.

10
Keystone Care

Providing administrative services to its two subsidiaries, keystone hospice and keystone home health, llc. providing social services to medically fragile populations in southeastern pennsylvania.

Health
11
Adamstown Area Library

The mission of the adamstown library is to maintain and improve the quality of life in our community by providing access to cultural, intellectual, and informational resources and programs to promote life-long learning for all ages. the…

Education
12
Vna Home Health Services

Vna home health services provides part-time, skilled, intermittent home health services that have been ordered by a physician and are medically necessary to the treatment of an illness or injury. vna home health services offers a wide…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Scranton Area Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Jamie Kotula Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 47 years old; the field is 21. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number17%5%<5yr13%2%5–10yr20%19%10–20yr14%16%20–35yr15%21%35–55yr23%38%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value17%2%<5yr13%0%5–10yr20%10%10–20yr14%16%20–35yr15%21%35–55yr23%51%55yr+

The field is 17% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 2% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%1/62
the rest of the field
9%
125/1,328

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

61 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 61 of the 121 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
15
Early backer (in before they grew)
59/61
Grantees still filing
46/61
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNIITED WAY OF LACKAWANNA AND WAYNE — $506,000 · OtherUNIITED WAY OF LACKAWANNA AND WAYNEUNITED WAY OF LACKAWANNA WAYNE AND PIKE COUNTIES — $375,000 · OtherUNITED WAY OF LACKAWANNA WAYNE AND PIKE COUNTIESUNITED NEIGHBORHOOD CENTERS OF NEPA — $259,300 · OtherUNITED NEIGHBORHOOD CENTERS OF NEPABOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF NEPA — $250,092 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF NEPAVALLEY YOUTH HOUSE — $150,000 · Other+83 more — $2,347,872 · Other+83 moreTELESPOND SENIOR SERVICES INC — $123,000 · Human ServicesTELESPOND SE…NORTHEASTERN CHILD CARE SERVICES — $118,500 · Human ServicesNORTHEASTERN…ST JOSEPHS CENTER — $95,750 · Human ServicesST JOSEPHS C…ALLONE CHARITIES — $70,000 · Human ServicesALLONE CHARI…THE CATHERINE MCAULEY CENTER — $56,000 · Human ServicesTHE CATHERIN…Young Men's Christian Association of Greater Scranton — $42,500 · Human ServicesYoung Men's …DRESS FOR SUCCESS LACKAWANNA — $35,000 · Human ServicesDRESS FOR SU…JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SCRANTON — $25,000 · Human ServicesPENNSYLVANIA DENTAL FOUNDATION — $20,000 · Human Services+1 more — $4,500 · Human ServicesSCRANTON PRIMARY HEALTH CARE CENTER — $101,000 · HealthSCRANTON COUNSELING CENTER — $95,000 · HealthTHINKBIG PEDIATRIC CANCER FUND INC — $15,000 · HealthTHE ADVOCACY ALLIANCE — $15,000 · HealthKATIES PLACE CLUBHOUSE — $10,000 · HealthGEISINGER HEALTH — $10,000 · Health+2 more — $6,250 · HealthUniversity of Scranton — $106,000 · EducationJOHNSON COLLEGE — $75,000 · EducationMarywood University — $13,500 · EducationEVERHART MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY SCIENCE AND ART — $57,500 · Arts & CultureYOUTH ARTS COALITION — $25,000 · Arts & CultureBROADWAY THEATRE LEAGUE OF SCRANTON INC — $25,000 · Arts & CulturePHILHARMONIC SOCIETY OF NEPA — $24,000 · Arts & CultureSCRANTON SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL — $15,000 · Arts & CultureSCRANTON JAZZ FESTIVAL — $15,000 · Arts & CultureSCRANTON NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING SERVICES INC — $63,200 · Housing & ShelterKEYSTONE RESCUE MISSION ALLIANCE INC — $50,000 · Housing & ShelterCOMMISSION ON ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY OF LUZERNE COUNTY — $25,000 · Housing & ShelterTCS-I MIDTOWN APARTMENTS — $10,000 · Housing & ShelterSCRANTON AREA FOUNDATION INC — $85,000 · PhilanthropyJAMIE KOTULA FOUNDATION — $5,000 · Philanthropy
Other$3,888,264Human Services$590,250Health$252,250Education$194,500Arts & Culture$161,500Housing & Shelter$148,200Philanthropy$90,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUNITED WAY OF LACKAWANNA WAYNE AND PIKE COUNTIES — $375,000 over 3y, 4.1% of budgetTELESPOND SENIOR SERVICES INC — $123,000 over 8y, 1.7% of budgetNORTHEASTERN CHILD CARE SERVICES — $118,500 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS OF NORTHEASTERN PA INC — $108,000 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetUniversity of Scranton — $106,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE POOR — $101,000 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetSCRANTON PRIMARY HEALTH CARE CENTER — $101,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetST JOSEPHS CENTER — $95,750 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetSCRANTON COUNSELING CENTER — $95,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetSCRANTON AREA FOUNDATION INC — $85,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetSAFETY NET — $80,500 over 8y, 32% of budgetCatholic Social Services — $80,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetJOHNSON COLLEGE — $75,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetALLONE CHARITIES — $70,000 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetSCRANTON NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING SERVICES INC — $63,200 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetEVERHART MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY SCIENCE AND ART — $57,500 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetTHE CATHERINE MCAULEY CENTER — $56,000 over 8y, 1.7% of budgetKEYSTONE RESCUE MISSION ALLIANCE INC — $50,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetYoung Men's Christian Association of Greater Scranton — $42,500 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetLACAWAC SANCTUARY FOUNDATION INC — $42,500 over 3y, 2.7% of budgetTHE BREAD BASKET OF NORTHEASTERN PA — $40,000 over 8y, 4.6% of budgetDRESS FOR SUCCESS LACKAWANNA — $35,000 over 2y, 15% of budgetLACKAWANNA BLIND ASSOCIATION — $35,000 over 7y, 1.3% of budgetSCRANTON PUBLIC LIBRARY — $25,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetUPPER VALLEY YMCA — $25,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCOMMISSION ON ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY OF LUZERNE COUNTY — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SCRANTON — $25,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetBROADWAY THEATRE LEAGUE OF SCRANTON INC — $25,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetPHILHARMONIC SOCIETY OF NEPA — $24,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetWAVERLY COMMUNITY HOUSE INC — $24,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetVALLEY IN MOTION — $23,500 over 2y, 6.6% of budgetSCRANTON TOMORROW — $23,477 over 1y, 27% of budgetDUNMORE BUSINESS ASSOCIATION INC — $20,000 over 1y, 46% of budgetPENNSYLVANIA DENTAL FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 1y, 7.1% of budgetNORTH POCONO BOOSTER ASSOCIATION — $19,750 over 4y, 7.7% of budgetLACKAWANNA HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $19,500 over 4y, 3.1% of budgetTHINKBIG PEDIATRIC CANCER FUND INC — $15,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetTHE ADVOCACY ALLIANCE — $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSCRANTON SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL — $15,000 over 2y, 8.7% of budgetSCRANTON JAZZ FESTIVAL — $15,000 over 3y, 5.1% of budgetCHILD ADVOCATES OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY — $15,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetMarywood University — $13,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKEYSTONE COLLEGE — $10,088 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ARC OF NORTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKATIES PLACE CLUBHOUSE — $10,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetPROJECT ORBIS INTERNATIONAL INC — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTCS-I MIDTOWN APARTMENTS — $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetGEISINGER HEALTH — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF LACKAWANNA WAYNE AND PIKE COUNTIES
  • Who funds TELESPOND SENIOR SERVICES INC
  • Who funds NORTHEASTERN CHILD CARE SERVICES
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS OF NORTHEASTERN PA INC
  • Who funds University of Scranton
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE POOR
  • Who funds SCRANTON PRIMARY HEALTH CARE CENTER
  • Who funds ST JOSEPHS CENTER
  • Who funds SCRANTON COUNSELING CENTER
  • Who funds SCRANTON AREA FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds SAFETY NET
  • Who funds Catholic Social Services
  • Who funds JOHNSON COLLEGE
  • Who funds ALLONE CHARITIES
  • Who funds SCRANTON NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING SERVICES INC
  • Who funds EVERHART MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY SCIENCE AND ART
  • Who funds THE CATHERINE MCAULEY CENTER
  • Who funds KEYSTONE RESCUE MISSION ALLIANCE INC
  • Who funds Young Men's Christian Association of Greater Scranton
  • Who funds LACAWAC SANCTUARY FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds THE BREAD BASKET OF NORTHEASTERN PA
  • Who funds DRESS FOR SUCCESS LACKAWANNA

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Scranton Area Foundation IncPA69.2× affinity31 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Scranton Area Foundation Inc · The Hawk Family Foundation · Moses Taylor Foundation Inc · Robert H Spitz Foundation · The Harry and Jeanette Weinberg Foundation Inc · Allone Charities · The Willary Foundation · Allone Foundation · Walter L Schautz Foundation · Northeastern Pennsylvania Health Care Foundation · Eureka Foundation · Fidelity D & D Charitable Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Margaret Briggs Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    27report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Margaret Briggs Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Margaret Briggs Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 121 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph