How much did MOSES TAYLOR FOUNDATION INC grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 46% of MOSES TAYLOR FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

staff materialsmembershipimprovement relocationhealth conventionmaterials analysisanalysis boardbeyond hours

2020

response coronaviruscoronavirus pandemicaedlibraryautomated externalexecutiveexpand

2021

programming mentalhealth staffresponse coronaviruscoronavirus pandemiccurrentintroductory racialracial equity

2022

nursesukrainefeedingcovidnursinghomelessshelter

2023

leadershipnursingappreciationpurchasetransportationseniorsummer

2024

studentsviolenceenhancevictimsexpandingpreventionsafety

2025

dementiapeerintegrationcaringtherapyadultsimprovement

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 64 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k9 grants · $33k
$10k–50k28 grants · $658k
$50k–250k25 grants · $2.6M
$250k+2 grants · $600k

$35,000

Median grant

States reached

$83M

Total assets

Largest grants

WAYNE COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$350,000
YMCA OF GREATER SCRANTON$250,000
SCRANTON AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$213,000
SCRANTON PRIMARY HEALTH CARE CENTER$180,000
MATERNAL & FAMILY HEALTH SERVICES INC$157,329
MEALS ON WHEELS OF NORTHEASTERN PA$152,000
BAYADA HOME HEALTH CARE$150,000
MARYWOOD UNIVERSITY$150,000
VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE$150,000
WRIGHT CENTER MEDICAL GROUP P C$148,400
UNITED WAY OF LACKAWANNA WAYNE & PIKE COUNTIES$139,500
OUTREACH - CENTER FOR COMMUNITY RESOURCES$125,000
SAINT JOSEPH'S CENTER$100,000
NEIGHBORWORKS NORTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA$100,000
HAZLETON INTEGRATION PROJECT INC$90,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $3.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14% — the area typically sits at 9%. 99% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$22M · 83 repeat orgs$4.0M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +44% since the first grant, against +30% for the ones you funded once.

83 repeat relationships — 42 still active in FY2024, 41 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$22M

$3.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%

+30%

Still filing today

66%

49%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $616k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesHealthEducationPhilanthropyHousing & ShelterCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

SC
SCRANTON COUNSELING CENTER
4× · 2019–2023 · $1.4M · revenue +43%
LC
LACKAWANNA COLLEGE
6× · 2018–2024 · $920k · revenue +35%
CO
COMMISSION ON ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY
3× · 2019–2021 · $855k · revenue +168%

Funded once

TS
TELESPOND SENIOR SERVICESINC
one grant, 2023 · $405k
GC
GEISINGER COMMONWEALTH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE
one grant, 2018 · $400k · revenue +24%
CS
CHILDREN'S SERVICE CENTER WYOMING VALLEY
one grant, 2018 · $300k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Northeastern Pennsylvania Health Care

Education

Keystone Care

Providing administrative services to its two subsidiaries, keystone hospice and keystone home health, llc. providing social services to medically fragile populations in southeastern pennsylvania.

Health

Community Counseling Center

To provide behavioral health services to individuals and families with mental health or substance abuse and related problems.

Health

Hospice of Central Pennsylvania

The mission of hospice of central pennsylvania is to provide the highest quality of emotional, physical, and spiritual support with compassion and respect.

Human Services

Human Services Inc

Outpatient mental health, mental health residential, and homeless services.

Human Services

Family Services of Western Pennsylvania

To empower children, adults and families by providing transformational care.as a member organization of wesley family services (wfs), family services of western pa (fswp) supported services that promote recovery and resiliency at more than…

Human Services

Family Health Council of Central Pa Inc

The mission of the family health council of central pennsylvania, inc. is to build and support community based health networks through partnerships, education, advocacy, and effective resource allocation.

Health

Pennsylvania Family Council

Foster social welfare by educating citizens.

—

Keystone Hospice

Providing comprehensive home and facility based palliative medicine and hospice care to patients with life limiting and life-threatening illness in southeastern pa. in addition, keystone hospice provides residential care through keystone…

Human Services

Northeast Community Center for

Deliver mental health/intellectual disability services to the people of northeast philadelphia. the organization services approximately 1,854 clients.

Human Services

Mount Nittany Health System

To provide management and administrative services to all mount nittany health subsidiaries.

Health

Friend Inc Community Services

Friend inc community services is a multi-services social agency that supports the well-being of those in need and is committed to strengthening the lives of families and individuals living th northeastern berks county.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Lackawanna and the most unlike its peers is King's College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 41 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 16% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 8% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

2%2/104

the rest of the field

367/4,735

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

100 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

96/100

Grantees still filing

81/100

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$12,125,571Health$5,109,972Human Services$3,522,229Education$2,734,734Housing & Shelter$925,000Philanthropy$901,331Food & Nutrition$215,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Scranton Area Foundation IncPA108.6× affinity50 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Scranton Area Foundation Inc · Allone Charities · Allone Foundation · The Luzerne Foundation · Ppl Foundation · Robert H Spitz Foundation · The Harry and Jeanette Weinberg · William G McGowan Charitable Fund · The Hawk Family Foundation · Margaret Briggs Foundation · The Tambur Family Foundation · United Way of Wyoming Valley

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation MOSES TAYLOR FOUNDATION INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: VALLEY IN MOTION.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~13 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 8 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 264203224 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on VALLEY IN MOTION, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 13 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 41% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Moses Taylor Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Moses Taylor Foundation Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

MOSES TAYLOR FOUNDATION INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

100 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Moses Taylor Foundation Inc?

More from the funding graph

MOSES TAYLOR FOUNDATION INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

100 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Moses Taylor Foundation Inc?

More from the funding graph