· Private foundation
Northeastern Pennsylvania Health Care Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k8 grants · $139k
- $50k–250k5 grants · $426k
- $250k+1 grant · $320k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| GEISINGER COLLEGE OF HEALTH SCIENCES | $320,000 |
| SCRANTON AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $100,000 |
| ALLIED SERVICES FOUNDATION | $100,000 |
| SCRANTON COUNSELING CENTER | $100,000 |
| SCRANTON AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $66,000 |
| VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE | $60,000 |
| CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF NEPA | $33,500 |
| JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF NORTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA | $25,000 |
| SCRANTON AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| FRIENDSHIP HOUSE | $15,000 |
| NEPA GIVES PROJECT FUND | $10,000 |
| SERVING SENIORS INC | $10,000 |
| TREHABWYOMING AND SUSQUEHANNA COUNTY TRANSPORTATION | $10,000 |
| MEALS ON WHEELS WYOMING VALLEY | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $400k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +55% since the first grant, against +24% for the ones you funded once.
21 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 17 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 16% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $580k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- GCGEISINGER COMMONWEALTH SCH OF MED7× · 2017–2023 · $2.2M · revenue +34%
- AFALLONE FOUNDATION4× · 2018–2021 · $367k · revenue +106%
- LCLACKAWANNA COLLEGE3× · 2020–2022 · $300k · revenue +41%
Funded once
- NPNORTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA HEALTHCARE FOUNDATIONone grant, 2021 · $200k
- NPNORTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION SCHOLARSHIP FUNDone grant, 2022 · $200k
- CSCHILDRENS SERVICES CENTERone grant, 2017 · $50k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The center provides comprehensive health and dental services for residents of scranton pa and other communities in lackawanna and surrounding counties.
Providing administrative services to its two subsidiaries, keystone hospice and keystone home health, llc. providing social services to medically fragile populations in southeastern pennsylvania.
To coordinate services among private and government agencies for specialized populations to ensure service continuity, reduce duplication, and assist individuals and families in accessing appropriate mental health, intellectual…
Providing comprehensive home-based and facility based hospice care to children and adults with life limiting and life threatening illnesses in southeastern pennsylvania. in addition, keystone hospice provides residential care through…
Provide emergency medical services.
To provide high quality, cost effective, primary health care and to coordinate care for patients requiring secondary and tertiary services.
Vna home health services provides part-time, skilled, intermittent home health services that have been ordered by a physician and are medically necessary to the treatment of an illness or injury. vna home health services offers a wide…
Recruit and retain health care professionals, improve access to health care and evaluate public health needs.
We heal, comfort and care for the people of our community by providing advanced and compassionate health care of superior quality and value supported by education and clinical research.
The mission of penn highlands mon valley is to enhance the health of the residents of the mid-monongahela valley area by providing outstanding healthcare services.
Improving healthcare through education, advocacy, service, and physical well-being.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Lackawanna Wayne and Pike Counties and the most unlike its peers is Little Sisters of the Poor. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 43 years old; the field is 22. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 16% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
51 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 51 of the 81 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds GEISINGER COMMONWEALTH SCH OF MED ↗
- Who funds ALLONE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LACKAWANNA COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds SCRANTON AREA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Greater Hazleton Partners In Education ↗
- Who funds ALLIED SERVICES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SCRANTON COUNSELING CENTER ↗
- Who funds ST JOSEPHS CENTER ↗
- Who funds VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE ↗
- Who funds CHILDRENS SVC CTR OF WYOM VALLEY INC ↗
- Who funds CASA OF WYOMING VALLEY ↗
- Who funds MISERICORDIA UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds KING'S COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds Young Men's Christian Association of Greater Scranton ↗
- Who funds THE ADVOCACY ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds Northern Tier Industry and Education Consortium In ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER NEPA ↗
- Who funds SERVING SENIORS INC ↗
- Who funds JOHNSON COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds THE CATHERINE MCAULEY CENTER ↗
- Who funds NORTHEAST REGIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds The Wright Center Medical Group ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF NORTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA ↗
- Who funds LUZERNE COUNTY CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds ALLONE CHARITIES ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Moses Taylor Foundation Inc · Allone Charities · Scranton Area Foundation Inc · Allone Foundation · Robert H Spitz Foundation · The Hawk Family Foundation · The Luzerne Foundation · The Tambur Family Foundation · William G McGowan Charitable Fund · The Harry and Jeanette Weinberg Foundation Inc · Margaret Briggs Foundation · United Way of Wyoming Valley
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Northeastern Pennsylvania Health Care Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Northeastern Pennsylvania Health Care Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Northeastern Pennsylvania Health Care Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.