· Public charity
Allone Charities
To make a real and substantive impact on the health and welfare of the people of northeastern and north central pennsylvania by improving access, affordability and quality of healthcare.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 69 grants below total $2,788,632 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $2,916,596 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $127,964 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k18 grants · $120k
- $10k–50k42 grants · $944k
- $50k–250k7 grants · $853k
- $250k+2 grants · $871k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| WYOMING CNTY HEALTHCARE CNTR | $567,975 |
| WVIA | $302,635 |
| POCONO MOUNTAINS UNITED WAY | $177,585 |
| OUR LADY OF THE SNOWS | $177,000 |
| BLUE RIDGE SCHOOL DISTRICT | $155,000 |
| THE LUZERNE FOUNDATION | $127,778 |
| VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE | $100,000 |
| SUSQUEHANNA COMMUNITY SCHOOL | $62,000 |
| FAMILY SERVICE ASSOCIATION | $54,127 |
| GREATER WYOMING VALLEY AREA Y | $46,241 |
| SUSQUEHANNA COUNTY INTERFAITH | $40,610 |
| RISING TIDE WELLNESS | $37,500 |
| CAN DO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $35,700 |
| PROGRESSIVE REHAB OF PA INC | $35,504 |
| AMERICAN RESCUE WORKERS | $35,125 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $2.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +25% since the first grant, against +3% for the ones you funded once.
92 repeat relationships — 40 still active in FY2025, 52 since wound down; 26 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $837k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PMPOCONO MOUNTAINS UNITED WAY8× · 2017–2025 · $640k · revenue +250%
- WUWILKES UNIVERSITY7× · 2017–2024 · $425k · revenue +15%
- VIVOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE5× · 2020–2025 · $322k · revenue +20%
Funded once
- DODAUGHTERS OF ZION INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES INC WARRIORS FOR CHRISTone grant, 2024 · $300k
- UPUMH PA CORP UMH NY CORPone grant, 2020 · $75k · revenue -7%
- YMYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF PITTSTON PENNSYLVANIAone grant, 2019 · $60k · revenue -76%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To coordinate services among private and government agencies for specialized populations to ensure service continuity, reduce duplication, and assist individuals and families in accessing appropriate mental health, intellectual…
The mission of penn highlands mon valley is to enhance the health of the residents of the mid-monongahela valley area by providing outstanding healthcare services.
We heal, comfort and care for the people of our community by providing advanced and compassionate health care of superior quality and value supported by education and clinical research.
Our community-based and controlled health care system exists to improve regional access to a wide array of premier primary care and advanced health services while supporting a reverence for life and the worth and dignity of each individual.
Providing administrative services to its two subsidiaries, keystone hospice and keystone home health, llc. providing social services to medically fragile populations in southeastern pennsylvania.
Wrc pennsylvania memorial home's mission is to provide choices for generations. built on a not-for-profit foundation of caring, the organization offers residential and personal care, home and community-based services, skilled and…
UPMC Williamsport is a subsidiary of UPMC Susquehanna. The mission of UPMC Susquehanna and its subsidiaries is to serve the community by providing outstanding patient care and shaping tomorrow's health care through clinical and…
To provide high quality, cost effective, primary health care and to coordinate care for patients requiring secondary and tertiary services.
Wrc senior services provides choices for generations. built on a not-for-profit foundation of caring, the organization offers residential and personal care, home and community-based services, skilled and rehabilitative health care.
Providing comprehensive home-based and facility based hospice care to children and adults with life limiting and life threatening illnesses in southeastern pennsylvania. in addition, keystone hospice provides residential care through…
Valley healthcare system shall improve our community's health by delivering the highest quality behavioral healthcare guided by our consumer's needs.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Wyoming Valley and the most unlike its peers is Wyoming County Healthcare Center Ii. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 17% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 9% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
144 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 144 of the 174 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds WYOMING COUNTY HEALTHCARE CENTER II ↗
- Who funds POCONO MOUNTAINS UNITED WAY ↗
- Who funds WILKES UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds NORTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA EDUCATIONAL TELEVISION ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE ↗
- Who funds THE LUZERNE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GREATER WYOMING VALLEY AREA YMCA ↗
- Who funds FAMILY SERVICE ASSOCIATION OF NORTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA ↗
- Who funds ECUMENICAL ENTERPRISES INC ↗
- Who funds OUTREACH - CENTER FOR COMMUNITY RESOURCES ↗
- Who funds CASA OF WYOMING VALLEY ↗
- Who funds OUR LADY OF THE SNOWS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ST FRANCIS OF ASSISI KITCHEN ↗
- Who funds CAN DO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds TREHAB ASSOCIATES INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF THE POCONOS INC ↗
- Who funds COMMISSION ON ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY OF LUZERNE COUNTY ↗
- Who funds ALLIED SERVICES PERSONAL CARE INC ↗
- Who funds THE CATHERINE MCAULEY CENTER ↗
- Who funds POCONO SERVICES FOR FAMILIES AND CHILDREN INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds SCRANTON PRIMARY HEALTH CARE CENTER ↗
- Who funds MONROE COUNTY MEALS ON WHEELS INC ↗
- Who funds MATERNAL & FAMILY HEALTH SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds B-K HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds ST JOSEPHS CENTER ↗
- Who funds UNITED NEIGHBORHOOD CENTERS OF NORTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA ↗
- Who funds LEHIGH CARBON COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SCRANTON NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds Pennsylvania Elks Major Projects Inc ↗
- Who funds THE HELPING HANDS SOCIETY OF HAZLETON AREA SCHUYLKILL AND CARBON COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER NEPA ↗
- Who funds ALLIED SERVICES SKILLED NURSING CENTER ↗
- Who funds UMH PA CORP UMH NY CORP ↗
- Who funds ROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC ↗
- Who funds University of Scranton ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Moses Taylor Foundation Inc · Allone Foundation · Scranton Area Foundation Inc · The Luzerne Foundation · Ppl Foundation · The Harry and Jeanette Weinberg Foundation Inc · William G McGowan Charitable Fund · Robert H Spitz Foundation · United Way of Wyoming Valley · Northeastern Pennsylvania Health Care Foundation · The Hawk Family Foundation · The Tambur Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Allone Charities funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.