· Public charity
Allegheny County Medical Society Foundation
Advancing wellness by confronting social determinants and health disparities.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 20 grants below total $216,500 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $259,750 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $43,250 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k7 grants · $52k
- $10k–50k13 grants · $165k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BEVERLY'S BIRTHDAYS | $20,000 |
| PITTSBURGH MERCY | $20,000 |
| JEREMIAH'S PLACE | $15,000 |
| ANGEL'S PLACE INC | $12,500 |
| BLIND AND VISION REHABILITATION | $12,500 |
| NORTH HILLS AFFORDABLE HOUSING | $12,500 |
| ABIDING MISSIONS | $12,500 |
| LIGHT OF LIFE MINISTRIES INC | $10,000 |
| SOJOURNER HOUSE | $10,000 |
| STRONG WOMEN STRONG GIRLS | $10,000 |
| FAMILYLINKS | $10,000 |
| SAMARTIAN COUNSELING CENTER | $10,000 |
| COMMUNITY HUMAN SERVICES CORP | $10,000 |
| THE CHILDREN'S HOME OF PITTSBURGH | $8,500 |
| LAUGHLIN CHILDREN'S CENTER | $8,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $535k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +32% since the first grant, against +28% for the ones you funded once.
29 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $27k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- JPJEREMIAH'S PLACE PITTSBURGH RELIEF NURSERY7× · 2017–2024 · $125k · revenue +280%
- APAngels Place Inc7× · 2017–2024 · $91k · revenue +110%
- LOLIGHT OF LIFE MINISTRIES INC5× · 2019–2024 · $81k · revenue +3%
Funded once
- CPCOMMUNITY PARTNERS IN ASTHMA CARE INCone grant, 2021 · $66k · revenue -6%
- WFWESELY FAMILY SERVICESone grant, 2021 · $20k
- WFWESLEY FAMILY SERVICESgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $20k · revenue +69%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide health empowerment services to injection drug users and prevent the spread of hiv.
The mission of the family health council of central pennsylvania, inc. (fhccp) is to build and support community-based health networks through partnerships, education, advocacy, and effective resource allocation.
The organization is a leading organization in northwestern pennsylvania for quality early care and education. the organization provides direct service as well as training and planning leadership for a wide georaphic region.
We, pittsburgh mercy health system and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. mercy life center is a member of pittsburgh mercy health system…
To provide residential and community-based services and advocacy for women, children, and families, providing job training and employment assistance, as well as outreach and residential programs in order to help its clients achieve…
Our mission is to support and partner with families rearing children who have emotional or mental health needs in order to improve their quality of life.
The midwife center is southwestern pennsylvania's only licensed and accredited freestanding birth center offering full scope nurse-midwifery care to women and their families. services include prenatal labor and delivery, postpartum,…
To coordinate services among private and government agencies for specialized populations to ensure service continuity, reduce duplication, and assist individuals and families in accessing appropriate mental health, intellectual…
To provide a continuum of care for homeless individuals that leads toward self-sufficiency.
Strengthening families by restoring the traditional, foundational principles and values.
The organization advocates with, empowers, and supports people with disabilities and their families throughout their lives.
To support parenting by enabling young children to grow & learn in a safe, stimulating, loving environment. pic works to provide and increase access to high-quality early childhood education and school-age programs that give children…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Familylinks Inc and the most unlike its peers is Community Partners in Asthma Care Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 16% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 8% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
43 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 43 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds JEREMIAH'S PLACE PITTSBURGH RELIEF NURSERY ↗
- Who funds Angels Place Inc ↗
- Who funds LIGHT OF LIFE MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY PARTNERS IN ASTHMA CARE INC ↗
- Who funds BEVERLY'S PGH ↗
- Who funds Footbridge for Families Inc ↗
- Who funds Pittsburgh Action Against Rape ↗
- Who funds GIRLS INC OF GREATER PITTSBURGH ↗
- Who funds NORTH HILLS AFFORDABLE HOUSING INC ↗
- Who funds PITTSBURGH MERCY HEALTH SYSTEM INC ↗
- Who funds PROPEL SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds VISABILITY ↗
- Who funds UNITED METHODIST CHURCH UNION ↗
- Who funds ABIDING MISSIONS ↗
- Who funds SAMARITAN COUNSELING CENTER OF W PA ↗
- Who funds CR JRS CHIP ↗
- Who funds GLOBAL LINKS ↗
- Who funds STO-ROX NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds HOMELESS CHILDREN'S EDUCATION FUND ↗
- Who funds WARD HOME INC ↗
- Who funds PITTSBURGH THREE RIVERS MARATHON INC ↗
- Who funds MAYA ORGANIZATION ↗
- Who funds GATEWAY MEDICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds WESLEY FAMILY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds FAMILYLINKS INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY HUMAN SERVICES CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds MARY & ALEXANDER LAUGHLIN CHILDREN'S CENTER ↗
- Who funds STOREHOUSE FOR TEACHERS D/B/A THE EDUCATION PARTNERSHIP ↗
- Who funds SOJOURNER HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOME OF PITTSBURGH ↗
- Who funds EVERY CHILD INC ↗
- Who funds PREGNANCY CARE CENTERS DBA NETWORK OF LIFE ↗
- Who funds PROVIDENCE CONNECTIONS INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY MEDICINE EDUCATION CONSORTIUM ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH ↗
- Who funds The Institute for Equity-Centered Leadership ↗
- Who funds ACHIEVA ↗
- Who funds Variety the Childrens Charity ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Pittsburgh Foundation · Hillman Family Foundations · The United Way of Southwestern Pennsylvania · Aj and Sigismunda Palumbo Charitable Trust · The Grable Foundation · Richard King Mellon Foundation · Staunton Farm Foundation 540-054 Dba Staunton Farm Foundation · The Heinz Endowments · Upmc Group · The Jack Buncher Foundation · American Eagle Outfitters Foundation · Eqt Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Allegheny County Medical Society Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Allegheny County Medical Society Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Allegheny County Medical Society Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.